Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 70
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
All today's birthdays', congrats!
dan (37)
rchydro (64)
CapRack (30)


Next birthdays
11/06 dan (37)
11/06 rchydro (64)
11/06 CapRack (30)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: General Science and Electronics
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

Does anyone know how these LiDARs work?

1 2 3 4 
Move Thread LAN_403
Patrick
Fri Aug 12 2011, 04:40AM Print
Patrick Registered Member #2431 Joined: Tue Oct 13 2009, 09:47PM
Location: Chico, CA. USA
Posts: 5639
From my friends at the IARC, who are almost all using this device -> Link2


1313124044 2431 FT0 Lidar
(From the BNM-IT India team power point presentation.)

Im thinking of using the URG-04LX-UG01 simple one (1,200 USD), but the Michigan team was using the 6,500 USD one.

Do these devices use phase relationships to determine distance? or time of flight? If they use time of flight then the minimum useful range is 20mm, in 20mm the speed of light would mean very short emission, detection and a very fast clock.

I really think they use TDOA like the RF foxhunts with the non-moving electrically scanned radio antennas that amatures build.

Back to top
Bjørn
Fri Aug 12 2011, 05:59AM
Bjørn Registered Member #27 Joined: Fri Feb 03 2006, 02:20AM
Location: Hyperborea
Posts: 2058
A common method is to modulate the laser (often at several frequencies) and record the returning signal. From the different phase shifts at different frequencies you can calculate the distance. The webpages for URG-04LX-UG01 suggests that is what they do.

I have a $100 pocket range finder that has a resolution of 1 mm with a range of 50 m that uses that method.
Back to top
Patrick
Fri Aug 12 2011, 01:12PM
Patrick Registered Member #2431 Joined: Tue Oct 13 2009, 09:47PM
Location: Chico, CA. USA
Posts: 5639
Bjørn wrote ...

A common method is to modulate the laser (often at several frequencies) and record the returning signal. From the different phase shifts at different frequencies you can calculate the distance. The webpages for URG-04LX-UG01 suggests that is what they do.

I have a $100 pocket range finder that has a resolution of 1 mm with a range of 50 m that uses that method.
Oooo... thats just the explanation i needed. Bjorn, which lidar do you have?

We are all having problems with the data rate on the $1200 one being about 12 hertz for the $6,500 they are getting 40 Hertz, i think the electric motor is the slowest part being mechanical, 2400 rpm, so maybe i could mod a pocket one like yours.
Back to top
Carbon_Rod
Fri Aug 12 2011, 03:40PM
Carbon_Rod Registered Member #65 Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 06:43AM
Location:
Posts: 1155
SLAM + URG driver:
Link2

You can find the 1cm resolution @ 5m one for under $3500, but note they are a fragile device originally intended for use as factory light curtains.


The Kinect at $100 for both video + LADAR-like scanning is unbeatable in terms of price:
Link2

Cheers,
Back to top
Patrick
Fri Aug 12 2011, 04:01PM
Patrick Registered Member #2431 Joined: Tue Oct 13 2009, 09:47PM
Location: Chico, CA. USA
Posts: 5639
Carbon_Rod wrote ...

SLAM + URG driver:
Link2

You can find the 1cm resolution @ 5m one for under $3500, but note they are a fragile device originally intended for use as factory light curtains.
So far they've all survived really bad crashes multiple times, when the rest of the machine went to pieces. There are 6 teams using them and they've all crashed but not had a Lidar fail yet.



Carbon_Rod wrote ...


The Kinect at $100 for both video + LADAR-like scanning is unbeatable in terms of price:
Link2

Cheers,
But so far the Dubai and USC teams have the most experience with the Kinect and they say it cant see or generate useful data past 30 inches or so (for navigation, LiDAR), dont know what you all think, but thats what they said. The Dubai team was going to use both, but wanted to use the kinect only if possible.
Back to top
PSCG
Fri Aug 12 2011, 06:05PM
PSCG Registered Member #3792 Joined: Sun Mar 27 2011, 06:07PM
Location:
Posts: 136
If you want more information about Lidars, check Sam's Laser Faq - Laser Insruments and Applications. He has put a lot of work about them (and it seems that isn't difficult to construct something like this ether).
Back to top
Patrick
Fri Aug 12 2011, 08:20PM
Patrick Registered Member #2431 Joined: Tue Oct 13 2009, 09:47PM
Location: Chico, CA. USA
Posts: 5639
PSCG wrote ...

If you want more information about Lidars, check Sam's Laser Faq - Laser Insruments and Applications. He has put a lot of work about them (and it seems that isn't difficult to construct something like this ether).
TY PSCG, i really need a more optimal solution, so ill look at sams stuff.
Back to top
Pinky's Brain
Fri Aug 12 2011, 08:31PM
Pinky's Brain Registered Member #2901 Joined: Thu Jun 03 2010, 01:25PM
Location:
Posts: 837
wrote ...

A common method is to modulate the laser (often at several frequencies) and record the returning signal.
I assume you mean record the interference of the returning light with the (attenuated) original?

If you just record the returning signal you still have the problem of needing to detect minute time of flight for high resolution (~3 ps for 1 mm resolution). The modulation only helps with aliasing.
Back to top
Patrick
Fri Aug 12 2011, 10:05PM
Patrick Registered Member #2431 Joined: Tue Oct 13 2009, 09:47PM
Location: Chico, CA. USA
Posts: 5639
Pinky's Brain wrote ...

wrote ...

A common method is to modulate the laser (often at several frequencies) and record the returning signal.
I assume you mean record the interference of the returning light with the (attenuated) original?

If you just record the returning signal you still have the problem of needing to detect minute time of flight for high resolution (~3 ps for 1 mm resolution). The modulation only helps with aliasing.

I think I wil use the one called phase difference or some such name they call it.
Back to top
Bjørn
Fri Aug 12 2011, 10:24PM
Bjørn Registered Member #27 Joined: Fri Feb 03 2006, 02:20AM
Location: Hyperborea
Posts: 2058
Yes, it is the phase difference that is recorded.

I have one of the Bosch units and it is very accurate but the refreshrate is about 3 Hz so it would be very slow for this use.
Back to top
1 2 3 4 

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.