If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.
Special Thanks To:
Aaron Holmes
Aaron Wheeler
Adam Horden
Alan Scrimgeour
Andre
Andrew Haynes
Anonymous000
asabase
Austin Weil
barney
Barry
Bert Hickman
Bill Kukowski
Blitzorn
Brandon Paradelas
Bruce Bowling
BubeeMike
Byong Park
Cesiumsponge
Chris F.
Chris Hooper
Corey Worthington
Derek Woodroffe
Dalus
Dan Strother
Daniel Davis
Daniel Uhrenholt
datasheetarchive
Dave Billington
Dave Marshall
David F.
Dennis Rogers
drelectrix
Dr. John Gudenas
Dr. Spark
E.TexasTesla
eastvoltresearch
Eirik Taylor
Erik Dyakov
Erlend^SE
Finn Hammer
Firebug24k
GalliumMan
Gary Peterson
George Slade
GhostNull
Gordon Mcknight
Graham Armitage
Grant
GreySoul
Henry H
IamSmooth
In memory of Leo Powning
Jacob Cash
James Howells
James Pawson
Jeff Greenfield
Jeff Thomas
Jesse Frost
Jim Mitchell
jlr134
Joe Mastroianni
John Forcina
John Oberg
John Willcutt
Jon Newcomb
klugesmith
Leslie Wright
Lutz Hoffman
Mads Barnkob
Martin King
Mats Karlsson
Matt Gibson
Matthew Guidry
mbd
Michael D'Angelo
Mikkel
mileswaldron
mister_rf
Neil Foster
Nick de Smith
Nick Soroka
nicklenorp
Nik
Norman Stanley
Patrick Coleman
Paul Brodie
Paul Jordan
Paul Montgomery
Ped
Peter Krogen
Peter Terren
PhilGood
Richard Feldman
Robert Bush
Royce Bailey
Scott Fusare
Scott Newman
smiffy
Stella
Steven Busic
Steve Conner
Steve Jones
Steve Ward
Sulaiman
Thomas Coyle
Thomas A. Wallace
Thomas W
Timo
Torch
Ulf Jonsson
vasil
Vaxian
vladi mazzilli
wastehl
Weston
William Kim
William N.
William Stehl
Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Registered Member #1143
Joined: Sun Nov 25 2007, 04:55PM
Location: Vilnius, Lithuania
Posts: 721
Here is my first and last one x-ray generator It contains 100KV 10mA oil cooled x ray tube, 2KW IR2153 SMPS, 2-phase 15KV 0,05A HF transformers, high power full wave 8x voltage multiplier for low ripple voltages, and 1500pcs of 3mA 50ns 0,5Apeak diodes, and filament supply Few photos: X ray tube
Registered Member #1143
Joined: Sun Nov 25 2007, 04:55PM
Location: Vilnius, Lithuania
Posts: 721
I don't know, still need to find it. as you can see i get sharp-less photos, just with x-ray film i get quite nice results Konica Minolta x ray film MG-SR
Registered Member #33
Joined: Sat Feb 04 2006, 01:31PM
Location: Norway
Posts: 971
Ok, if you're interested, I can give you a tip to get higher resolution x-rays. Resolution like this example should be possible with your x-ray generator.
I would guess the focal spot size is around a millimeter, judging from the anode angle and rated current. What voltage and current are you running at?
Registered Member #1143
Joined: Sun Nov 25 2007, 04:55PM
Location: Vilnius, Lithuania
Posts: 721
Anders M. wrote ...
Ok, if you're interested, I can give you a tip to get higher resolution x-rays. Resolution like this example should be possible with your x-ray generator.
I would guess the focal spot size is around a millimeter, judging from the anode angle and rated current. What voltage and current are you running at?
I don't know, First i am using low filament current to get as high x-ray energy as possible, and drawing around 60-80W at full power.( for safety reasons) nice picture, just question how to make that ?
Registered Member #33
Joined: Sat Feb 04 2006, 01:31PM
Location: Norway
Posts: 971
Did you use the film in an intensifying cassette? Those tend to really limit the resolution, with the "Ultra fast" or "Ultra rapid" ones being the worst, and the "Fine" or "Detail" ones, being the best. Mammography cassettes are even higher resolution, but they should only be used with mammography film (emulsion on one side only, like normal photographic film), since they only have a single fluorescent screen (this is one of the reasons that they have higher resolution). Direct film exposure, without an intensifying screen, gives by far the highest resolution. The picture I linked to in the last post is a direct exposure. This also requires much longer exposure time. You can also get limited resolution if the x-ray tube is close to the object you're x-raying, especially if the focal spot is large. Increase the distance, but not too much (inverse square law), somewhere between 50cm and 100cm from tube to object is a nice compromise.
Registered Member #1143
Joined: Sun Nov 25 2007, 04:55PM
Location: Vilnius, Lithuania
Posts: 721
it looks like i am getting 0,6-1mA 80-100Kv for tube... just made some measurements. but i don't know how accurate they are since multimeter is electronic... And yes, i was using intensifying screen to make photos with film, maybe i need to try without them later
Registered Member #33
Joined: Sat Feb 04 2006, 01:31PM
Location: Norway
Posts: 971
With a direct film exposure, remember that you need a much longer exposure time, probably 10-20 times as long as with the intensifying cassette, maybe even longer. A minute or two in your case I guess, depending on the distance between the tube and the film.
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.