Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 100
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
All today's birthdays', congrats!
dan (37)
rchydro (64)
CapRack (30)


Next birthdays
11/07 Dave Marshall (40)
11/07 Worms (46)
11/08 Bert (77)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: General Science and Electronics
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

Anybody following this "energy catalyzer" invention thing?

first  4 5 6 7 
Move Thread LAN_403
Patrick
Thu Jun 02 2011, 06:48AM
Patrick Registered Member #2431 Joined: Tue Oct 13 2009, 09:47PM
Location: Chico, CA. USA
Posts: 5639
I think this rossi guy is feeding AC or AC+DC over that clamp-on AC meter or something, A resistive shunt should have been used for recording input power. perhaps a water diversion trick...anyway now rossi is making wild claims about the energy densityavailble for conversion.... im trying to find that phyics article, will post if i can find it.
Back to top
jpsmith123
Fri Jun 24 2011, 12:40AM
jpsmith123 Registered Member #1321 Joined: Sat Feb 16 2008, 03:22AM
Location:
Posts: 843
Some recent things:

Not too much put up yet but the site is now "live":
Link2

Video documentary about "Low Energy Nuclear Revolution":
Link2
Back to top
Nicko
Fri Jun 24 2011, 06:48AM
Nicko Registered Member #1334 Joined: Tue Feb 19 2008, 04:37PM
Location: Nr. London, UK
Posts: 615
Hmmmm. Delay in selling units...

Link2

Back to top
Proud Mary
Fri Jun 24 2011, 08:46AM
Proud Mary Registered Member #543 Joined: Tue Feb 20 2007, 04:26PM
Location: UK
Posts: 4992
Nicko wrote ...

Hmmmm. Delay in selling units...

Link2



Even without the "self-destruct" capability, Rossi could never have got his box of tricks passed through the CE safety self-certification scheme, which will mean he will have to send dozens of his devices to approved CE safety testing contractors where they will remain for years, and all at Mr Rossi's very considerable expense. So he won't be selling the device in Europe.

I am dismayed to see someone debase themselves so much, and wonder how much further he could have to fall.



Back to top
Mattski
Fri Jun 24 2011, 08:46AM
Mattski Registered Member #1792 Joined: Fri Oct 31 2008, 08:12PM
Location: University of California
Posts: 527
Nicko wrote ...

Hmmmm. Delay in selling units...
Link2
To quote a bit from this article:
wrote ...
From reading Andrea Rossi's comments, it seems the technology will not be released for use by individuals (use in homes) any time soon, unless the patents involved are granted. It is an absolute tragedy that due to the delays of the U.S. Patent Office (and their policy of not granting patents to "cold fusion" processes), the E-Cat may only see use in industrial settings for some time to come.

It is very possible that there will be lives lost due to this delay, and much unnecessary human suffering. The world is in economic collapse, and many people around the world could benefit from a cheap device that could economically power their home or small business. An E-Cat device could provide the energy needed to economically pump water from wells in drought stricken areas, be used as a brute force method of water desalinization, provide an alternative to high cost heating oil in frigid areas, and help countless individuals that live in poverty make ends meet.
...
If the U.S. Patent Office does not grant these patents, there will be blood on their hands. They will be literally taking clean water out of the mouths of infants, stealing food off the plates of children, slapping poverty stricken people in the face, and contributing to the financial decline of the world.
Oh the humanity! </sarcasm> This article only takes credibility away from Rossi with its inflammatory childish writing, though of course it's not fair to judge Rossi based on a third party's opinion.

If they actually have something then the industrial applications where they can control their IP should be appearing in the coming years, it is common for start up companies to first target specific high-value customers rather than the general public. If they don't have anything then more delays will surface. Based on the article Stella recently posted in General Chat and their esoteric method of measuring energy output I'm not exactly holding my breath.
Back to top
Ash Small
Fri Jun 24 2011, 10:08AM
Ash Small Registered Member #3414 Joined: Sun Nov 14 2010, 05:05PM
Location: UK
Posts: 4245
Mattski wrote ...

Nicko wrote ...

Hmmmm. Delay in selling units...
Link2
To quote a bit from this article:
wrote ...
From reading Andrea Rossi's comments, it seems the technology will not be released for use by individuals (use in homes) any time soon, unless the patents involved are granted. It is an absolute tragedy that due to the delays of the U.S. Patent Office (and their policy of not granting patents to "cold fusion" processes), the E-Cat may only see use in industrial settings for some time to come.

It is very possible that there will be lives lost due to this delay, and much unnecessary human suffering. The world is in economic collapse, and many people around the world could benefit from a cheap device that could economically power their home or small business. An E-Cat device could provide the energy needed to economically pump water from wells in drought stricken areas, be used as a brute force method of water desalinization, provide an alternative to high cost heating oil in frigid areas, and help countless individuals that live in poverty make ends meet.
...
If the U.S. Patent Office does not grant these patents, there will be blood on their hands. They will be literally taking clean water out of the mouths of infants, stealing food off the plates of children, slapping poverty stricken people in the face, and contributing to the financial decline of the world.
Oh the humanity! </sarcasm> This article only takes credibility away from Rossi with its inflammatory childish writing, though of course it's not fair to judge Rossi based on a third party's opinion.

If they actually have something then the industrial applications where they can control their IP should be appearing in the coming years, it is common for start up companies to first target specific high-value customers rather than the general public. If they don't have anything then more delays will surface. Based on the article Stella recently posted in General Chat and their esoteric method of measuring energy output I'm not exactly holding my breath.

If Rossi was that concerned about human suffering he'd release the technology anyway, without a patent.

My guess is he's planning to get rich by publishing a book about how the 'powers that be' prevented him from releasing this 'unproven' technology. (the usual 'conspiracy theory' stuff.)
Back to top
Proud Mary
Fri Jun 24 2011, 11:22AM
Proud Mary Registered Member #543 Joined: Tue Feb 20 2007, 04:26PM
Location: UK
Posts: 4992
Simple fraud alone does not explain the involvement of a number of senior academics in this business.

I have followed LENR research for some years, and am in no doubt that in some cases small but perfectly genuine anomalies have been observed. The natural world is full of phenomena which seem to fly in the face of our expectations. Who would have anticipated the negative thermal expansion of water below 4 °C?

Academics now find themselves pushed ever harder to discover something with commercial applications, and someone like Rossi appears and makes a sales pitch out of all their conditional language - all the mights and possiblies are translated into robust marketing language, and the ubiquitous line at the bottom of every journal paper "further research required" is crossed out.

Once on board, the professors find it hard to abandon ship without abandoning their ability to attract further research grants, the very stuff of which tenure is made.



Back to top
jpsmith123
Fri Jun 24 2011, 11:50AM
jpsmith123 Registered Member #1321 Joined: Sat Feb 16 2008, 03:22AM
Location:
Posts: 843
After seeing all those people in the video, it doesn't seem plausible to me that they're all either "incompetent", or part of a massive fraud. They just don't come across that way.

If it's real (and frankly it's looking more and more real to me) I can understand Rossi's apprehension.

What I would expect to happen, though, at some point, is that some government (or group of governments) would offer to buy him out and put the technology in the public domain.

Assuming it's real, based upon what's already known, nickel nano powder + hydrogen + catalyst, some resourceful government somewhere willing to spend some money may be able to duplicate it, just using a trial and error approach to find the "catalyst" (or even a different/better "catalyst" for that matter).
Back to top
Ash Small
Fri Jun 24 2011, 12:00PM
Ash Small Registered Member #3414 Joined: Sun Nov 14 2010, 05:05PM
Location: UK
Posts: 4245
jpsmith123 wrote ...

.
Assuming it's real, based upon what's already known, nickel nano powder + hydrogen + catalyst, some resourceful government somewhere willing to spend some money may be able to duplicate it, just using a trial and error approach to find the "catalyst" (or even a different/better "catalyst" for that matter).


Nichel nano powder + hydrogen + catalyst sounds pretty similar to conventional hydrogen fuel cells.

While I've not read everything that is available on this subject, it does appear that this is pretty much all we know about it.

I'm currently of the 'opinion' that, while this may indeed be some kind of 'new' fuel cell, it is probably based on existing fuel cell technology, and will therefore not live up to all the claims made by Rossi, etc.
Back to top
Proud Mary
Fri Jun 24 2011, 12:36PM
Proud Mary Registered Member #543 Joined: Tue Feb 20 2007, 04:26PM
Location: UK
Posts: 4992
jpsmith123 wrote ...

Assuming it's real, based upon what's already known, nickel nano powder* + hydrogen + catalyst, some resourceful government somewhere willing to spend some money may be able to duplicate it, just using a trial and error approach to find the "catalyst" (or even a different/better "catalyst" for that matter).

There is a good deal of LENR open source literature on anomalies apparently associated with hydrogen loading of various metals, including Pd, Ti, U, and here, as in Rossi's case, Ni:

E. Campari, S. Focardi, V. Gabbani, V. Montalbano, F. Piantelli, S. Veronesi Surface Analysis of hydrogen loaded nickel alloys Link2



* Added afterthought: Raney nickel - a spongiform catalyst - has long been well known in industrial organic synthesis.


Back to top
first  4 5 6 7 

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.