If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.
Special Thanks To:
Aaron Holmes
Aaron Wheeler
Adam Horden
Alan Scrimgeour
Andre
Andrew Haynes
Anonymous000
asabase
Austin Weil
barney
Barry
Bert Hickman
Bill Kukowski
Blitzorn
Brandon Paradelas
Bruce Bowling
BubeeMike
Byong Park
Cesiumsponge
Chris F.
Chris Hooper
Corey Worthington
Derek Woodroffe
Dalus
Dan Strother
Daniel Davis
Daniel Uhrenholt
datasheetarchive
Dave Billington
Dave Marshall
David F.
Dennis Rogers
drelectrix
Dr. John Gudenas
Dr. Spark
E.TexasTesla
eastvoltresearch
Eirik Taylor
Erik Dyakov
Erlend^SE
Finn Hammer
Firebug24k
GalliumMan
Gary Peterson
George Slade
GhostNull
Gordon Mcknight
Graham Armitage
Grant
GreySoul
Henry H
IamSmooth
In memory of Leo Powning
Jacob Cash
James Howells
James Pawson
Jeff Greenfield
Jeff Thomas
Jesse Frost
Jim Mitchell
jlr134
Joe Mastroianni
John Forcina
John Oberg
John Willcutt
Jon Newcomb
klugesmith
Leslie Wright
Lutz Hoffman
Mads Barnkob
Martin King
Mats Karlsson
Matt Gibson
Matthew Guidry
mbd
Michael D'Angelo
Mikkel
mileswaldron
mister_rf
Neil Foster
Nick de Smith
Nick Soroka
nicklenorp
Nik
Norman Stanley
Patrick Coleman
Paul Brodie
Paul Jordan
Paul Montgomery
Ped
Peter Krogen
Peter Terren
PhilGood
Richard Feldman
Robert Bush
Royce Bailey
Scott Fusare
Scott Newman
smiffy
Stella
Steven Busic
Steve Conner
Steve Jones
Steve Ward
Sulaiman
Thomas Coyle
Thomas A. Wallace
Thomas W
Timo
Torch
Ulf Jonsson
vasil
Vaxian
vladi mazzilli
wastehl
Weston
William Kim
William N.
William Stehl
Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Registered Member #3414
Joined: Sun Nov 14 2010, 05:05PM
Location: UK
Posts: 4245
Another idea might be to use four 90 degree pipe bends.
They come in different diameters and radiuses (radii?), a bit of careful cutting and welding, with subsequent polishing should produce an acceptable toroid.
I've seen these in cast aluminium, as well as other materials.
EDIT:
and using these would be even easier, 180 degree bends:
Registered Member #1408
Joined: Fri Mar 21 2008, 03:49PM
Location: Oracle, AZ
Posts: 679
I have tried just what you propose! I weld aluminum and thought of this as an ideal solution. What happened was that even though I sanded and cleaned up the joints quite well; any imperfection was where I was getting most of my output. I can see why a spun, turned toroid is valuable. It seems ANY imperfection becomes a consistent breakout point (to a degree of exclusion of the majority of the rest).
Registered Member #3414
Joined: Sun Nov 14 2010, 05:05PM
Location: UK
Posts: 4245
quicksilver wrote ...
In the same theme, there are many cake or Jello molds,that, buying two of them and bolting (or welding) them together will yield a toroid. In the "Kitchen" section of many stores are various substitutions that may work well. I did find one that was a "half toroid" at WallMart (aluminum), ground the lip off of it and it appeared fairly nice for a small coil.
quicksilver wrote ...
I have tried just what you propose! I weld aluminum and thought of this as an ideal solution. What happened was that even though I sanded and cleaned up the joints quite well; any imperfection was where I was getting most of my output. I can see why a spun, turned toroid is valuable. It seems ANY imperfection becomes a consistent breakout point (to a degree of exclusion of the majority of the rest).
At first it seems there is an 'apparent' contradiction between the two above posts.
Are you suggesting that a continuous weld around the outer periphery of the toroid would be ok, but that a weld at only a few points around the periphery will result in breakout from those points only?
If so, maybe this could be overcome by grinding a groove around the periphery, and filling with a bead of weld?
Registered Member #30
Joined: Fri Feb 03 2006, 10:52AM
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
Posts: 6706
Well, if you're the kind of coiler who likes to watch sparks dance in all directions around a bare toroid, then it has to be nice and smooth. Lumps and bumps will attract the sparks.
But the vast majority of solid-state coils, even DRSSTCs, need a breakout point to get started without blowing something, or to make really long sparks without striking their own electronics and dying. Using a dedicated breakout point makes the toroid shape less critical, you can get away with a small rim or lip. If you like randomly dancing sparks, you can install several points, but the effect isn't quite as nice as an old-school spark-gap coil with a synchronous rotary gap and a smooth spun toroid.
From the old TCML days, I remember seeing toroids made of pipe elbows as suggested above. I believe there is a thing called a "muffler donut" in America at least. It's a toroid made of steel tube, from which you can cut odd-shaped bends when making up custom exhaust headers for engines.
Registered Member #1408
Joined: Fri Mar 21 2008, 03:49PM
Location: Oracle, AZ
Posts: 679
What may be a seeming contradiction (IMO) in density issues when welding as opposed to mechanically combining two sections. Note, that I noticed this in two examples & realistically that's not a very large sample
No matter how I cleaned up the exterior wall, the interior was uneven in terms to wall density. In a mechanical fitting (a simple bolt through the center, etc) there is a continuous wall thickness.
I should also make clear this was noticed when the circumference was smaller and from a smaller unit overall. This MAY increase sensitivity to non-uniform density. However, in a commercial "turned toroid" the consistency vary only a slight degree. Even with a foil coated tube the thickness would be only 2-3 sheets of foil making the density difference pretty slight. Obviously only opinion, but I think that the more powerful / larger coils have less sensitivity to this than small units.
Empirically, I had also noticed that in a "quick & dirty" tube coil made with foil, a folded projection also had a tendency to produce a break-out point on a consistent basis; not allowing a more consistent "flow" pattern of sparks from the toroid (again much more so in a lower powered, smaller coil).
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.