Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 59
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
One birthday today, congrats!
RoV IW3IPD (62)


Next birthdays
01/12 RoV IW3IPD (62)
01/13 Dr. Dark Current (35)
01/13 Bob J (72)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: Projects
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

uRADMonitor – Online remote radiation monitoring station

Move Thread LAN_403
Steve Conner
Sun Oct 28 2012, 08:52PM
Steve Conner Registered Member #30 Joined: Fri Feb 03 2006, 10:52AM
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
Posts: 6706
Oh, that explains the weird appearance of the pulses from your Geiger tube. Your 3.2 design was just plain wrong, the tube is supposed to run off well-regulated smooth DC.

As far as I can see from the 3.2 schematic, the problem has nothing to do with a lack of diodes. It looks like you forgot to add a smoothing capacitor to the output.
Back to top
radhoo
Sun Oct 28 2012, 09:21PM
radhoo Registered Member #1938 Joined: Sun Jan 25 2009, 12:44PM
Location: Romania
Posts: 701
Unfortunately there is no filter capacitor in v3.2

Steve Conner wrote ...

As far as I can see from the 3.2 schematic, the problem has nothing to do with a lack of diodes. It looks like you forgot to add a smoothing capacitor to the output.
Well, good that I moved further to 3.3 then, but I'll correct the 3.2 as well. At the time I made the 3.2, I did not have a scope.
EDIT: first thread modified. It also shows your suggestions, under 3.2.

Steve Conner wrote ...

Oh, that explains the weird appearance of the pulses from your Geiger tube.
What is the weird appearance you are referring to?


EDIT: let's better focus on 3.3, to avoid creating confusion with the old versions.
Back to top
radhoo
Sun Oct 28 2012, 10:50PM
radhoo Registered Member #1938 Joined: Sun Jan 25 2009, 12:44PM
Location: Romania
Posts: 701
uSv/h added: Link2
Back to top
Steve Conner
Mon Oct 29 2012, 10:48AM
Steve Conner Registered Member #30 Joined: Fri Feb 03 2006, 10:52AM
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
Posts: 6706
radhoo wrote ...

Here is how the pulses look like:
300x146

See the series of little notches? That's the "weird appearance" I'm referring to. A proportional counter would interpret that as 6 or 7 pulses of different energies. I was puzzled, but now I see it's your unsmoothed power supply feeding through onto the signal. smile
Back to top
radhoo
Mon Oct 29 2012, 04:45PM
radhoo Registered Member #1938 Joined: Sun Jan 25 2009, 12:44PM
Location: Romania
Posts: 701
Steve, while your logic makes sense, I'm not sure that's the cause.

See the pulses in 3.3, looking similar to those in 3.2:
300x150

But as you already saw, 3.3 has a nice constant 400+ DC line.

If I zoom out they look like this:
Geiger Pulse Oscilloscope 2
I'd say it's a perfectly normal shape. So why the saw-tooth shape in the zoomed version?
Back to top
radhoo
Wed Oct 31 2012, 10:38AM
radhoo Registered Member #1938 Joined: Sun Jan 25 2009, 12:44PM
Location: Romania
Posts: 701
Almost a constant.


Intresting to see that the circuit I've built can measure it without any interferences.

While the short term CPMs seem almost random, it is clear there's a tendency for the natural radiation dose of this area.
Back to top
Proud Mary
Thu Nov 01 2012, 01:23PM
Proud Mary Registered Member #543 Joined: Tue Feb 20 2007, 04:26PM
Location: UK
Posts: 4992
radhoo wrote ...

Steve, while your logic makes sense, I'm not sure that's the cause.

See the pulses in 3.3, looking similar to those in 3.2:
300x150

But as you already saw, 3.3 has a nice constant 400+ DC line.

If I zoom out they look like this:
Geiger Pulse Oscilloscope 2
I'd say it's a perfectly normal shape. So why the saw-tooth shape in the zoomed version?

I thought it was a train of damped waves caused by shock excitation following the steep wavefront at the instant of GM tube conduction. Reducing Ra will shorten dead time, and may attenuate the effect. Try, say, 6M8 to start with, and see if that has a helpful effect. Don't go below 3M9 without serious thought. Changing Rk away from the classical Ra/Rk = 45:1 ratio should also be considered within reason, if it seems to help with the ragged pulse tail. Moving Va down to the lower end of the plateau could also be tried.

A simple discriminator or edge detector is often used to chop off or ignore the lower parts of the pulse to separate pulses that have run together in a bulge at the bottom - a problem that increases and becomes statistically significiant with rising count rate. Discriminator level control may be set either on the front panel, or by a pre-set on the PCB.



1351776038 543 FT111231 Simple Discriminator



Amp And Discriminator
Back to top
radhoo
Thu Nov 01 2012, 03:25PM
radhoo Registered Member #1938 Joined: Sun Jan 25 2009, 12:44PM
Location: Romania
Posts: 701
Thanks Proud Mary, but this is exactly why I told Steve that the 3.2 remarks might be creating confusion. The pulses are counted correctly in 3.3, and the shape looks good. I will correct the missing capacitor in 3.2 ,and publish updated diagrams, but this is of minor importance.

Dr.Nicolae Zamfir, director of Horia Hulubei National Institute of Physics and Nuclear Engineering commented in regards to my uRADMonitor construction, when contacted by the local press. My reply is in the comments section of the page:
Link2

Please use an online translator.
Back to top
Proud Mary
Thu Nov 01 2012, 04:31PM
Proud Mary Registered Member #543 Joined: Tue Feb 20 2007, 04:26PM
Location: UK
Posts: 4992
radhoo wrote ...

Thanks Proud Mary, but this is exactly why I told Steve that the 3.2 remarks might be creating confusion. The pulses are counted correctly in 3.3, and the shape looks good. I will correct the missing capacitor in 3.2 ,and publish updated diagrams, but this is of minor importance.

Dr.Nicolae Zamfir, director of Horia Hulubei National Institute of Physics and Nuclear Engineering commented in regards to my uRADMonitor construction, when contacted by the local press. My reply is in the comments section of the page:
Link2

Please use an online translator.

It's good to see that your project has aroused interest and is helping to raise awareness of radiaoctive pollution! smile

Here are a few ideas based on the criticism of your work:

You can improve the confidence level in your readings by increasing the aperture of your detector - in practice, by using multiple GM tubes.

You knew a direct conversion of CPM into dose rate would cause trouble!

You can improve your counting accuracy by dead-time compensation. The effect of this will be very very small at the low count rates of normal background, BUT it will enable you to put "Figures corrected for dead time." on your results. I've said it will be a tiny effect at low count rates, but might grow to mean something significant in measurments over very long periods of time - years, or until there is another big accident. You can calculate the real dead time of your system (that is, the GM tube as it is connected into a functioning circuit) by a simple practical test which I will paste up here if you don't know it.

Over a long period of continuous operation, it is likely that the GM tube's characteristics will change slightly. You must devise a simple test that can be repeated once a month to record the sensitivity of the tube, so you can detect the trend of any change and make corrections for it in the results.
Back to top
radhoo
Thu Nov 01 2012, 06:04PM
radhoo Registered Member #1938 Joined: Sun Jan 25 2009, 12:44PM
Location: Romania
Posts: 701
Once again, some excellent suggestions. Thank you!
Back to top

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.