Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 99
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
All today's birthdays', congrats!
Download (31)
ScottH (37)


Next birthdays
11/03 Electroguy (94)
11/04 nitromarsjipan (2024)
11/04 mb (31)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: General Chatting
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

Nuclear events taking place in Japan.

Move Thread LAN_403
Conundrum
Sun Apr 17 2011, 12:39PM
Conundrum Registered Member #96 Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 05:37PM
Location: CI, Earth
Posts: 4061
Link2

Censorship Fail!

I'll probably get in deep merde for posting this, but I would like to see the relevant documents minus the censorship, just out of scientific curiosity.

No doubt submarine reactors are by nature much more likely to fail catastrophically due to the higher core density reducing the safety margins for coolant failure duration, need for longer endurance and more dangerous (i.e. HEU and plutonium) core materials.

It does raise an interesting point, according to some articles a submarine collision could under certain conditions lead to the failsafes not operating as designed, see Link2

Link2
-A
Back to top
Patrick
Sun Apr 17 2011, 06:14PM
Patrick Registered Member #2431 Joined: Tue Oct 13 2009, 09:47PM
Location: Chico, CA. USA
Posts: 5639
Conundrum wrote ...

Link2
Censorship Fail!
spokesman said: “As soon as we were told about this we took steps to ensure the ­document was removed.

“We take nuclear security very seriously.”


Obviously not so seriously as to get it done right the first time...idiots.



Back to top
Patrick
Tue May 03 2011, 05:06AM
Patrick Registered Member #2431 Joined: Tue Oct 13 2009, 09:47PM
Location: Chico, CA. USA
Posts: 5639
Are the nuclear events of japan stable? or what, im looking for new, current info.

Link2 about robots
Link2 IARC anyone?
Back to top
Conundrum
Wed May 04 2011, 08:27PM
Conundrum Registered Member #96 Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 05:37PM
Location: CI, Earth
Posts: 4061
How hard would it be to incorporate a microminiature Geiger counter into mobile phones?

I can see this being a major selling feature, especially if it also records radiation dosage into the memory even when the phone is "off", with a wake-up feature if some preset threshold is exceeded.

The usefulness of this can be seen if say a few people walk past say a hidden nuclear device, exposed Co-60 source etc on their normal day and their phone counters log this, with the location of said source.
Or someone sitting fishing in a boat has one of these and it records the activity of the weapons grade uranium hidden in that yacht on its way to wherever.

As you may or may not know, it is possible to make a device not much bigger than an accelerometer, which uses radio frequency techniques to achieve end window like sensitivity with a fraction of the footprint of a conventional GM tube and power supply.
These could easily be made for around $0.50 each in bulk which would add a minimal amount to the cost of a phone.
Perhaps even integrate them into microSD cards so your cheap phone can become a radiation counter?

-A
Back to top
Patrick
Wed May 04 2011, 10:22PM
Patrick Registered Member #2431 Joined: Tue Oct 13 2009, 09:47PM
Location: Chico, CA. USA
Posts: 5639
Conundrum wrote ...

How hard would it be to incorporate a microminiature Geiger counter into mobile phones?

I can see this being a major selling feature, especially if it also records radiation dosage into the memory even when the phone is "off", with a wake-up feature if some preset threshold is exceeded.

The usefulness of this can be seen if say a few people walk past say a hidden nuclear device, exposed Co-60 source etc on their normal day and their phone counters log this, with the location of said source.
Or someone sitting fishing in a boat has one of these and it records the activity of the weapons grade uranium hidden in that yacht on its way to wherever.

As you may or may not know, it is possible to make a device not much bigger than an accelerometer, which uses radio frequency techniques to achieve end window like sensitivity with a fraction of the footprint of a conventional GM tube and power supply.
These could easily be made for around $0.50 each in bulk which would add a minimal amount to the cost of a phone.
Perhaps even integrate them into microSD cards so your cheap phone can become a radiation counter?

-A
Whoa! You have an idea there!!! "Distributed detection" throughout society, I demand a prototype!

This could be a better way to stop a pakistan's "loose nuke" problem, rather then just a single sophisticated border device. Even if each device is less capable then a true detector. And obviously accidental release like churnoble/fukushima.
Back to top
James
Wed May 04 2011, 10:25PM
James Registered Member #3610 Joined: Thu Jan 13 2011, 03:29AM
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 506
I don't see much point in that. You'd either have people freaking out left and right over background radiation, or it wouldn't be sensitive enough to be useful. Not only that, but GM tubes only count events, they do not tell you anything about the energy of the radiation, something that an ion chamber is much better for.

Instruments are only as useful as the skill of their operator allows. I don't think the vast majority of the population would know how to interpret the data presented by a geiger counter or ionization chamber.
Back to top
Patrick
Thu May 05 2011, 02:06AM
Patrick Registered Member #2431 Joined: Tue Oct 13 2009, 09:47PM
Location: Chico, CA. USA
Posts: 5639
James wrote ...

Instruments are only as useful as the skill of their operator allows. I don't think the vast majority of the population would know how to interpret the data presented by a geiger counter or ionization chamber.
I do agree, and have been pondering this point. i guess a distributed system would have to be professionally deployed and operated.
Back to top
Patrick
Fri May 06 2011, 06:33PM
Patrick Registered Member #2431 Joined: Tue Oct 13 2009, 09:47PM
Location: Chico, CA. USA
Posts: 5639
There was some debate as to whether the 2 of 3 exposed workers were "burned" from
"Hot water" (temp) or "Hot water" (radiation), well look here :

Link2



From IAEA:

For two of the three workers, significant skin contamination over their legs was confirmed. The Japanese authorities have stated that during medical examinations carried out at the National Institute of Radiological Sciences in the Chiba Prefecture, the level of local exposure to the workers' legs was estimated to be between 2 and 6 sieverts.

While the patients did not require medical treatment, doctors decided to keep them in hospital and monitor their progress over coming days.

There were workers who spent less than a few minutes right in and next to the fully exploded and glowing reactor at chernobyl... Who are still alive today. But 6 Sieverts to the legs, yikes. There will be long term health consequences at the very least.
Back to top
Nicko
Fri May 06 2011, 09:01PM
Nicko Registered Member #1334 Joined: Tue Feb 19 2008, 04:37PM
Location: Nr. London, UK
Posts: 615
Patrick wrote ...

... 6 Sieverts to the legs, yikes. There will be long term health consequences at the very least.
Link2

Long term health consequence likely to be an early death...
Back to top
Patrick
Fri May 06 2011, 11:54PM
Patrick Registered Member #2431 Joined: Tue Oct 13 2009, 09:47PM
Location: Chico, CA. USA
Posts: 5639
Nicko wrote ...

Link2

Long term health consequence likely to be an early death...
Well I think the benchmarks on wiki were meant for whole body exposure to photon radiation. But these workers were contaminated with physical elemental radiation, I would expect a shortened life none the less, yet nothing about that has been said... I guess its that stoic japanese thing.
Back to top

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.