Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 53
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
All today's birthdays', congrats!
Barry (70)
Snowcat (37)
wylie (43)


Next birthdays
02/01 Barry (70)
02/01 Snowcat (37)
02/01 wylie (43)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: Tesla Coils
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

DRSSTC: Feeback problem (Steve's driver)

1 2 3 
Move Thread LAN_403
hv-friekie
Sat Jan 22 2011, 08:24AM Print
hv-friekie Registered Member #2273 Joined: Thu Aug 06 2009, 07:02PM
Location:
Posts: 37
Hey guys,

I have a major problem with my drsstc. I am using steve's newest driver with my on pcb layout. The bridge is made form 2 semikron skm300gb12v IGBTs.
However, when i turn on the interrupter the drsstc works for like half a second before loosing the feedback signal. The bridge is supplied by a ringcore transfore which gives me 72V on the capacitor.
And after loosing the feedbacksignal it don't helps to turn the interrupter on and of, i have to restart the whole driver. But then the process repeats, i get signal for a short time and then it stops again.
I have no idea how to fix this.
I added some pictures.

Best regards,

Philipp, Germany
1295684631 2273 FT0 Dscn1011

1295684631 2273 FT0 Dscn1012

1295684631 2273 FT0 Dscn1005
Back to top
Mads Barnkob
Sat Jan 22 2011, 09:18AM
Mads Barnkob Registered Member #1403 Joined: Tue Mar 18 2008, 06:05PM
Location: Denmark, Odense C
Posts: 1968
Hey Philipp

If you loose the feedback signal, then it must be because the primary circuit does not oscillate...

Have you tested you driver with a signal generator as the feedback input? (Just scoping! Power to the bridge would likely kill your IGBTs) It could just be a simple 555 timer.

Since you made your own PCB, there could still be some mistakes in that, do you mind posting the PCB layout? I made my PCB too for the same driver and I messed up a couple of things too :)
Back to top
hv-friekie
Sat Jan 22 2011, 12:06PM
hv-friekie Registered Member #2273 Joined: Thu Aug 06 2009, 07:02PM
Location:
Posts: 37
Thank you foryour answer.

Have you tested you driver with a signal generator as the feedback input? (Just scoping! Power to the bridge would likely kill your IGBTs) It could just be a simple 555 timer.

Yes, i did this before hooking it up to the IGBT's and everything. I used a 555 with a seriell resonant circuit to produce a sine wave, it oscillated at abut 20khz.
I got a nice, interrupted 20khz square wave, so the driver generally works.

Here is the schematic and the pcb layout:

1295697995 2273 FT106802 Screen

1295697995 2273 FT106802 Screen1
Back to top
hv-friekie
Sat Jan 22 2011, 02:21PM
hv-friekie Registered Member #2273 Joined: Thu Aug 06 2009, 07:02PM
Location:
Posts: 37
I just realized that i get a feedback signal up to a specific on time.
When i start turning up the on time the tc starts working, i can pull about 4cm sparks.
But when i want to increase the on time to get longer sparks, i am loosing feedback again.
Can somebody explain this to me?
Back to top
Linas
Sat Jan 22 2011, 03:16PM
Linas Registered Member #1143 Joined: Sun Nov 25 2007, 04:55PM
Location: Vilnius, Lithuania
Posts: 721
I don't like idea use quite slow IGBT is small DRSSTC which has high Fo.
Second, if you run your coil with low voltage on bridge use single core 100T CT, it can help keep signal right shape and test diodes, maybe they can block signal
Also try change polarity of CT, it heps sometimes smile
Back to top
hv-friekie
Sat Jan 22 2011, 04:48PM
hv-friekie Registered Member #2273 Joined: Thu Aug 06 2009, 07:02PM
Location:
Posts: 37
First, these are no slow IGBTs and this is not a small teslacoil. Secondary is 80cmX15cm and toroid is 45cmX15cm, so the frequency is about 80khz.

And i already replaced the 1:1000 CT with a 1:140 oen again, the results got better but i am still LOOSING feedback at a higher on time.

What to you mean by the diodes? Do you suppose that the diodes between the 1st schmitttrigger and the ct broken? I could test them.

With the polarity of the ct, i have already changed it. Bt then i get no output, so i guess the polarity i am using i right smile

Back to top
Gregory
Sat Jan 22 2011, 06:47PM
Gregory Registered Member #2922 Joined: Sun Jun 13 2010, 12:08AM
Location:
Posts: 226
the problem can be the OCD that disable the tesla coil, it can happen if you dont configured the reference potenciometer of the OCD
Back to top
hv-friekie
Sun Jan 23 2011, 10:47AM
hv-friekie Registered Member #2273 Joined: Thu Aug 06 2009, 07:02PM
Location:
Posts: 37
Yes, i also was supposing that. But the OCD LED doesn't shine, and the reference is set to more than 1V.
Furthermore, at the moment the OCD is dissabled, i short circuit the connector for the ct.
What i could try is making a bridge between pin 7 and 8, then it would be 100% sure that the ocd doesn't stop the signal.

Let me try that now.
Back to top
Bennem
Sun Jan 23 2011, 11:06AM
Bennem Registered Member #154 Joined: Sun Feb 12 2006, 04:28PM
Location: Westmidlands, UK
Posts: 260

Hi there,

Does your Torx173 optical receiver give an inverted signal output?
as Steves circuit is designed for an inverted one, as he uses the ***2412T
if not, you need to add another schmit trigger.

Just a thought.
Mel
Back to top
hv-friekie
Sun Jan 23 2011, 11:28AM
hv-friekie Registered Member #2273 Joined: Thu Aug 06 2009, 07:02PM
Location:
Posts: 37
Man, i am impressed you you guys try to understand the problem and see that tiny details.
I would be very pleased if you were right, unfortunately i already fixed this in my schematic by using pin 6 instead of pin 5 at the IC6A in my schematic.
This should invert the signal again, shouldn't it?

By the way, i bridged pin 7 and 8 at the lm311 to completly disable the oc protection, but there is no improvment. angry
Back to top
1 2 3 

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.