Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 90
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
All today's birthdays', congrats!
Download (31)
ScottH (37)


Next birthdays
11/02 Download (31)
11/02 ScottH (37)
11/03 Electroguy (94)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: General Chatting
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

Teleportation a step closer?

 1 2 3 
Move Thread LAN_403
Ash Small
Tue Jan 18 2011, 12:57AM
Ash Small Registered Member #3414 Joined: Sun Nov 14 2010, 05:05PM
Location: UK
Posts: 4245
Renesis wrote ...

IamSmooth wrote ...

I have a philosophical question about teleportation:

If it were truly possible to decode the entire structure, beam the information to another location and reassemble, would it truly be the same person? The person would have the same memories, but is it just a "clone"? In fact, one could read the structure and recreate it without dissassembling the original.

Would not true teleportation involve transporting the original atoms to the destination?

I have an even more philosophical question for you. Say we scanned my brain, the way your hypothetical teleporter does. We end up with a mindboggling amount of information that will be used to assemble an identical brain somewhere else. An identical copy, inseparable from the original. But what if we instead fed this information into a supercomputer, and wrote a program that would simulate my brains normal functions; a brain emulator?

That would really bring up some existential questions. Here we have a machine buildt by a human, made of nothing but common semiconductors, that has a human mind with the feelings and emotions one would expect from such. Should we even call it a machine? And if my body died just afterwards, would i still be alive, my mind living on inside the simulation? Or would it be only a memory of me, like a talking and thinking picture? Would the machine be sad, because the mind within it is no longer considered a human? Would it remember the time back when it was... me? Can a soul really be written in binary code? neutral




Personally, I think the brain works more like an analogue computer than a digital one, so I'd argue that the soul cannot be written in binary code.
Back to top
Nicko
Wed Jan 19 2011, 09:21AM
Nicko Registered Member #1334 Joined: Tue Feb 19 2008, 04:37PM
Location: Nr. London, UK
Posts: 615
Steve McConner wrote ...

Nicko wrote ...

[His somewhat obtuse, but elegant, response was to consider the process of lighting a candle from another candle - the second candle flame is derived from the first, but is not the same.

That's Buddhist teleportation for you - just kill the guy and have a baby at the destination. smile
Very slow teleportation, though...

Actually, you could book your slot, have a clone embryo sent to the "other place", wait 9 months, then jump under a train just as "you" are delivered at your destination !

Some would argue that such extratemporal "teleportation" also reverses ageing...
Back to top
Conundrum
Thu Jan 20 2011, 07:34AM
Conundrum Registered Member #96 Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 05:37PM
Location: CI, Earth
Posts: 4061
hm...
I have a theory about this, it might turn out that if (and this is a very big if) the human mind is too complex to send in this way it might be possible to exploit quantum effects to get around this.

It seems that measuring a given photon enough times degrades the stored information to the extent that it becomes irreversibly degraded while the destination photon approaches the state of the original.

In which case, the teleporter might work more like a photocopier which destroys the original.
Maybe using high energy X-ray beams while the subject spins at a few dozen RPM (needless to say this would be very, very bad for the unfortunate teleportee) and sends the information in parallel across the EM spectrum to overcome the bandwidth limitations.

Of course, one way to get around the problem with spinning someone at high speed could be to suspend them in a liquid such as ultrapure deionised water while supplying oxygen via a pipe.

(wasn't this on a film somewhere?!)

smile

-A

"Bothe£!£$" said Pooh, as the Heisenberg compensators went offline mid-transport...
Back to top
Ash Small
Thu Jan 20 2011, 07:55AM
Ash Small Registered Member #3414 Joined: Sun Nov 14 2010, 05:05PM
Location: UK
Posts: 4245
I read somewhere that if you were to use the technology that was used to 'teleport' the 'state' of an atom halfway around the world to 'teleport' the 'state' of all the atoms in the human body, it would take the power of all the computers in the world longer than the whole time the universe has existed.

It would be much quicker to walk.....
Back to top
HV Enthusiast
Thu Jan 20 2011, 03:11PM
HV Enthusiast Registered Member #15 Joined: Thu Feb 02 2006, 01:11PM
Location:
Posts: 3068
Ash Small wrote ...

I read somewhere that if you were to use the technology that was used to 'teleport' the 'state' of an atom halfway around the world to 'teleport' the 'state' of all the atoms in the human body, it would take the power of all the computers in the world longer than the whole time the universe has existed.

It would be much quicker to walk.....

Well, i hope that someone can stay still that long enough for their pattern to be read and stored.
Back to top
Nah
Thu Jan 20 2011, 09:29PM
Nah Registered Member #3567 Joined: Mon Jan 03 2011, 10:49PM
Location: USA, 1960s
Posts: 260
Another question, what if the teleporter messed up? Like if you lost a arm or a leg. suprised


Also, what if your atoms got mixed up with another persons?

Finally, the most important question.

Could you sue? cheesey
Back to top
Arcstarter
Fri Jan 21 2011, 12:07AM
Arcstarter Registered Member #1225 Joined: Sat Jan 12 2008, 01:24AM
Location: Beaumont, Texas, USA
Posts: 2253
Nah wrote ...

Another question, what if the teleporter messed up? Like if you lost a arm or a leg. suprised


Also, what if your atoms got mixed up with another persons?

Finally, the most important question.

Could you sue? cheesey
I think the people that see you teleport would sue you, for making them see such a monstrosity... That would be pretty bad, to have some guy's arm as a head.

Back to top
Coronafix
Fri Jan 21 2011, 01:29AM
Coronafix Registered Member #160 Joined: Mon Feb 13 2006, 02:07AM
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 938
EastVoltResearch wrote ...

Well, i hope that someone can stay still that long enough for their pattern to be read and stored.

This is why I believe it is our data storage and access that needs the next technological leap forward.
It just doesn't make sense to read data linearly anymore.
It is believed that the brain accesses memory holographically, which would explain the speed of thought
and being able to think of multiple things at once.
Back to top
Renesis
Fri Jan 21 2011, 07:18AM
Renesis Registered Member #2028 Joined: Mon Mar 16 2009, 08:13PM
Location: Norway
Posts: 319
Nah wrote ...

Another question, what if the teleporter messed up? Like if you lost a arm or a leg.

Im afraid that such an error would most likely repeat itself many times during such a massive data transmission, thus reducing you to a dead puddle of goo... blargh
Back to top
Bored Chemist
Fri Jan 21 2011, 01:22PM
Bored Chemist Registered Member #193 Joined: Fri Feb 17 2006, 07:04AM
Location: sheffield
Posts: 1022
This thread reminds me of a quote form the actor who played Mr Sulu.
Some one at a convention asked him "How to the Heisenberg compensators work?"
His reply was "Very well, thankyou."


Also, I could copy a poem in Chinese, but I wouldn't understand it at all.
The idea that I could take the information on how a brain is built and use that to write a program to act as a model brain isn't valid.
Back to top
 1 2 3 

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.