Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 25
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
No birthdays today

Next birthdays
05/04 Matthew T. (35)
05/04 Amrit Deshmukh (60)
05/05 Alexandre (32)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: High Voltage
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

Spiral impulse generator = rolled cap Blumlein induction coil!

first  4 5 6 7 
Move Thread LAN_403
Proud Mary
Wed Apr 23 2008, 11:11AM
Proud Mary Registered Member #543 Joined: Tue Feb 20 2007, 04:26PM
Location: UK
Posts: 4992
I have seen references to VIG oscillators, where the lines form part of an LC tuned circuit, so it may be possible to drive them quite hard.

My chief concern is about the 'goodness' of the dielectric, on which the velocity of propagation and voltage efficiency depends, not to mention holding off break downs.

If we could sort out the dielectric, almost anyone could achieve hundreds of kV and maybe more with such a simple device. I've noticed, though, that the seemingly more advanced designs often have more complex segmented winding arrangements.
Back to top
Dr. Shark
Wed Apr 23 2008, 10:21PM
Dr. Shark Registered Member #75 Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 09:30AM
Location: Montana, USA
Posts: 711
I redid my VIG with a significantly larger diameter, which as Harry pointed out is supposed to significantly increase the voltage efficiency. I also went for a 1:1 turns ratio with 9 turns each. On my 8cm diameter "core", this gives a D/n of nearly one, so the calculated efficiency should be about 50% without a ferrite core. Going for a much larger former would have improved the efficiency more, but what good would that be if it left me with only 3 turns from my 3m long strips, and therefore a maximum step up ratio of three?

I also redesigned the spark gap for super-low inductance, because apparently the inductance of the "fast side" of the generator is dominated by the switch. The two contacts are not separated by air but by 0.2mm of dielectric, so there is essentially zero loop area between them. Of course this does not allow repetitive operation without burning the dielectric.

Testing the thing immediately showed inter-turn arcing, I should have payed more attention winding the thing (It's getting late, and I am loosing interest in this project). As far as I could tell though, the output spark was still quite weak, most energy being burned in the switching spark gap.
1208989201 75 FT43795 Vig
Back to top
Proud Mary
Wed Apr 23 2008, 10:37PM
Proud Mary Registered Member #543 Joined: Tue Feb 20 2007, 04:26PM
Location: UK
Posts: 4992
Dr. Shark wrote ...
Testing the thing immediately showed inter-turn arcing, I should have payed more attention winding the thing (It's getting late, and I am loosing interest in this project). As far as I could tell though, the output spark was still quite weak, most energy being burned in the switching spark gap.
1208989201 75 FT43795 Vig


Getting the dielectric just right seems to be everything with this device. I'm sure there must be a source of a suitable material that is cheap and easy to get if only we could think what it was.

I've read several papers where the lines are described as metalized tapes, so I know I have that part right. But I have doubts about my plan to use several thicknesses of 100mm wide insulating tape as the dielectric, because of the difficulty of not trapping any air while I'm winding it with five thumbs.

Kraft paper and oil is always an option, I suppose. It has nothing like the dielectric properties of polyethylene or PTFE, but can be laid on thick and cheap!
Back to top
Firefox
Thu Apr 24 2008, 01:08AM
Firefox Registered Member #1389 Joined: Thu Mar 13 2008, 12:50AM
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 346
What about teflon tape? Its not exactly cheap, but it is an excellent insulator, and you can use relatively small amounts of it to insulate the coils.
Back to top
Proud Mary
Thu Apr 24 2008, 09:13AM
Proud Mary Registered Member #543 Joined: Tue Feb 20 2007, 04:26PM
Location: UK
Posts: 4992
Firefox wrote ...

What about teflon tape? Its not exactly cheap, but it is an excellent insulator, and you can use relatively small amounts of it to insulate the coils.

Yes, PTFE would be my first choice, but I have no idea where I might find 100mm wide tape of suitable thickness at a price I could afford. I'm sure it is available from specialist plastic stock suppliers, but having bought PTFE tubes and rods before, I have no doubt it would be expensive.
Back to top
Dr. Shark
Thu Apr 24 2008, 11:29AM
Dr. Shark Registered Member #75 Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 09:30AM
Location: Montana, USA
Posts: 711
PTFE would also be advantageous from a loss tangent point of view, apparently the Mylar that I am using is quite lossy, whereas PTFE is one of the best plastic dielectrics. I have no idea where it could be obtained though.
The insulating tape you plan on using is probably going to be PVC, do you know the dielectric properties of that? I think it is not commonly used for capacitors, but I don't know why.
Back to top
...
Thu Apr 24 2008, 02:30PM
... Registered Member #56 Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 05:02AM
Location: Southern Califorina, USA
Posts: 2445
Not sure how think you need the dialectic, but you can get 6" wide .005" for only $2/ft, 6" bu .010" for $3/ft, and many other sizes in between.

A little pricey, but not completely unrealistic...
Back to top
Proud Mary
Thu Apr 24 2008, 04:07PM
Proud Mary Registered Member #543 Joined: Tue Feb 20 2007, 04:26PM
Location: UK
Posts: 4992
Dr. Shark wrote ...

PTFE would also be advantageous from a loss tangent point of view, apparently the Mylar that I am using is quite lossy, whereas PTFE is one of the best plastic dielectrics. I have no idea where it could be obtained though.
The insulating tape you plan on using is probably going to be PVC, do you know the dielectric properties of that? I think it is not commonly used for capacitors, but I don't know why.


PVC has a typical dielectric constant of 3, and a dielectric strength between about 550V - 750V/mm.

Mylar has a typical dielectric constant of 3.2, and a dielectric strength of around 7kV/mm, vastly superior.

PTFE has a dielectric constant of around 2.1, a dielectric strength of 500V - 1kV/mm, but up to 5kV/mm in 'modified' PTFE, (almost as good as Mylar) but the dielectric strength per mm declines with increasing thickness for some reason.

I'm don't think my plan to use four thicknesses of PVC inslulating tape is likely work except at low charge voltages, so I shall have to keep an eye out for cheap sources of plastic shim or tape of suitable thickness.

If I were to charge my VIG with 14kV DC (rectified from an old but good 10kV NST) then the dielectric would need to hold off at least 28kV at the far end of the line. Allowing a 50% safety margin, this would mean the dielectric must be good to 42kV - which would be 6mm of Mylar.

I am beginning to understand why people have written about the use of capacitor winding machines in the construction of VIGs, though there are usually ingenious amateur means of getting almost as good results for almost none of the price.


Back to top
Dr. Dark Current
Thu Apr 24 2008, 04:19PM
Dr. Dark Current Registered Member #152 Joined: Sun Feb 12 2006, 03:36PM
Location: Czech Rep.
Posts: 3384
Harry wrote ...

PVC has a typical dielectric constant of 3, and a dielectric strength between about 550V - 750V/mm.
I really doubt that it has lower strength than air. I assume that mains cables etc. and all the wires with thick rubbery insulation are PVC insulated. Once I tried 40kV DC on a wire with some 1mm insulation and it didn't break down.



Back to top
Proud Mary
Thu Apr 24 2008, 05:21PM
Proud Mary Registered Member #543 Joined: Tue Feb 20 2007, 04:26PM
Location: UK
Posts: 4992
Plasmaddict wrote ...

Harry wrote ...

PVC has a typical dielectric constant of 3, and a dielectric strength between about 550V - 750V/mm.
I really doubt that it has lower strength than air. I assume that mains cables etc. and all the wires with thick rubbery insulation are PVC insulated. Once I tried 40kV DC on a wire with some 1mm insulation and it didn't break down.


Forgive me, I am not used to American notation, and misread the American "mil" as being mm in the table I was using. I have now learnt that 1 American mil = 0.0254 millimeters, which seems a very odd figure to use in metrology. The figures I have misquoted above should be read as American 'mils' and my conclusions about them ignored! cry
Back to top
first  4 5 6 7 

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.