Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 29
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
All today's birthdays', congrats!
Adam Munich (30)
Alfredo Texacca (60)


Next birthdays
05/02 Adam Munich (30)
05/02 Alfredo Texacca (60)
05/04 Matthew T. (35)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: High Voltage
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

X-Rays in small microwave bulb?

first  2 3 4 5 
Move Thread LAN_403
Proud Mary
Fri Nov 18 2016, 09:25PM
Proud Mary Registered Member #543 Joined: Tue Feb 20 2007, 04:26PM
Location: UK
Posts: 4992
A few years ago, here on 4HV there was a wave of enthusiasm for generating x-rays from unconventional sources, mostly from TV valves (tubes) driven in cold cathode/field emission mode.

To make my measurements I used a Fluke 440RF/D Low Energy X-ray Survey Meter, which gave quite accurate dose-rates at energies down to 12.5 keV. Below this, I used mica end-window GM tubes, which could count at energies below 4keV - so long as the rays didn't have to pass through too much air - a few cms - on their way into the window! smile

Anyway, the lowest PD at which I could detect any X-rays at all above background, and with a long integration time, was in the range 16 - 18 kV. As folk have suggested above, for all practical purposes, no quantity of X-rays will transit the glass wall until you get to a PD of about 20 kV.

Why not get one of those strong little Nd magnets and see how that affects the glow distribution in your tube. Could be interesting! smile
Back to top
Polonium210
Sat Nov 19 2016, 04:02PM
Polonium210 Registered Member #3450 Joined: Sun Nov 28 2010, 05:01AM
Location:
Posts: 61
johnf wrote ...

And you do not need lead.
ordinary iron / stainless steel stops x-rays up to 60kV.
Which deterctor does your ludlum have you have not specified this yet??

My Ludlum meter has a pancake probe.

Proud Mary wrote ...

Why not get one of those strong little Nd magnets and see how that affects the glow distribution in your tube. Could be interesting! smile

So these could be cathode rays? The magnet would affect the patterns being projected on the inside of the bulb?

Back to top
Proud Mary
Sat Nov 19 2016, 07:31PM
Proud Mary Registered Member #543 Joined: Tue Feb 20 2007, 04:26PM
Location: UK
Posts: 4992
Polonium210 wrote ...

Proud Mary wrote ...

Why not get one of those strong little Nd magnets and see how that affects the glow distribution in your tube. Could be interesting! smile

So these could be cathode rays? The magnet would affect the patterns being projected on the inside of the bulb?

If you have an ionized gas in there, sure an external magnetic field will affect it in some way - but you'll have to do the experiment to find out if you can see the change with the naked eye. If you do a google search using key words 'magnetic field' and 'ionized gas' you'll find out more stuff than you could carry home in a wheelbarrow.
Back to top
Physikfan
Sun Nov 20 2016, 02:28PM
Physikfan Registered Member #60240 Joined: Mon May 16 2016, 07:01PM
Location:
Posts: 304
The images show a gas discharge at about 0.03hP, voltage 4kV DC

Gas4kVohneMagnet0komma03hP
Without magnetic field, exposure time about 1s.
The yellow-green fluorescence of the glass is caused by electrons, "cathode rays".

Gas4kVmitMagnet0komma03hP
With magnetic field, the permanent magnet is a strong disc-shaped nickel iron-boron magnet, exposure time about 1s.

As Proud Mary already mentioned "If you have an ionized gas in there, sure an external magnetic field will affect it in some way, the magnetic field deflects the plasma as well as the electrons, visible through the changed fluorescence.
Back to top
Proud Mary
Sun Nov 20 2016, 03:31PM
Proud Mary Registered Member #543 Joined: Tue Feb 20 2007, 04:26PM
Location: UK
Posts: 4992
Physikfan wrote ...

As Proud Mary already mentioned "If you have an ionized gas in there, sure an external magnetic field will affect it in some way", the magnetic field deflects the plasma as well as the electrons, visible through the changed fluorescence.

Wow, that's a really strong effect! smile I really like these kind of experiments because they take you straight back to the beginning of particle and plasma physics, where you can do the same experiments that were being done in the 1890s without having to pay a fortune for special materials and equipment.

I wonder if you arranged bar magnets coaxially in a ring around the circumference of the tube if the plasma stream might be accelerated?
Back to top
Physikfan
Sun Nov 20 2016, 04:38PM
Physikfan Registered Member #60240 Joined: Mon May 16 2016, 07:01PM
Location:
Posts: 304
Hi Proud Mary

I agree with you, acceleration and deacceleration of the ions should be possible with a magnetic field with directions from any point of a circle around the glass tube towards the center of the tube according to F = q (v x B), Lorentz force, but not in the direction of the originally speed.
The force would be perpendicular to the speed of the ions, so you will have no acceleration in the direction of the originally speed
in a linear tube.
Or what kind of different magnetic fields around the tube you have in mind?

Back to top
Physikfan
Sun Nov 20 2016, 09:44PM
Physikfan Registered Member #60240 Joined: Mon May 16 2016, 07:01PM
Location:
Posts: 304
The second picture shows also the effect of the Lorentz force:

F = q (v × B)

The force (F) acts perpendicular to the velocity (v) of the ions (charge q) and perpendicular to the magnetic field (B),
as seen by the distortion of the ion current.
This force therefore acts not only on current-carrying conductor loops (electric motor!), but also on plasmas.
Back to top
Ash Small
Mon Nov 21 2016, 09:27AM
Ash Small Registered Member #3414 Joined: Sun Nov 14 2010, 05:05PM
Location: UK
Posts: 4245
Sulaiman wrote ...

Really !
you expect 10's kV x-rays to penetrate walls cheesey


Well, you can obtain an image from a 5kv x-ray source, PM has done it and posted the results here in the past.

I maybe wouldn't expect 20kv x-ray's to penetrate most walls, depends on the wall wink
Back to top
Uspring
Mon Nov 21 2016, 02:52PM
Uspring Registered Member #3988 Joined: Thu Jul 07 2011, 03:25PM
Location:
Posts: 711
A comprehensive table of X-Ray attenuation coefficients is here: Link2
A barely 1mm thick aluminum sheet will e.g. reduce a 20kV flux by a factor of 2 or 5mm by a factor of 2^5 = 32.

Wrt Poloniums OP, there is not much chance of X-Ray production if there is gas in the bulb, since it stops electron acceleration to high enough energies as hen918 pointed out. If there is glow only from the inner surface of the glass itself, electrons might have sufficient energy to produce X-Rays when they hit the glass.
Back to top
Proud Mary
Mon Nov 21 2016, 09:03PM
Proud Mary Registered Member #543 Joined: Tue Feb 20 2007, 04:26PM
Location: UK
Posts: 4992
Physikfan wrote ...

The second picture shows also the effect of the Lorentz force:

F = q (v × B)

The force (F) acts perpendicular to the velocity (v) of the ions (charge q) and perpendicular to the magnetic field (B),
as seen by the distortion of the ion current.
This force therefore acts not only on current-carrying conductor loops (electric motor!), but also on plasmas.


I've been thinking about this all day. You could use this apparatus to measure the strength of a magnetic field, or conversely measure a voltage. With successive magnets you could bend the plasma flow into a helix, that is to say an inductance, and then pair it with a capacitor to make a resonant circuit.
Back to top
first  2 3 4 5 

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.