Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 25
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
No birthdays today

Next birthdays
05/04 Matthew T. (35)
05/04 Amrit Deshmukh (60)
05/05 Alexandre (32)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: Tesla Coils
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

How cruical is a VARIAC?

 1 2 3
Move Thread LAN_403
klugesmith
Wed Sept 23 2015, 03:31AM
klugesmith Registered Member #2099 Joined: Wed Apr 29 2009, 12:22AM
Location: Los Altos, California
Posts: 1714
Mads Barnkob wrote ...
See page 1 for a overload curve, %overload vs. time Link2,%20M5%20,%20M10,%20and%20M20%20Variac% 20Autotransformers.pdf
Great reference there, Mads.
It's for a series of 400 Hz products, which is how a 3 kVA autotransformer can weigh in at only 13 pounds.
I bet the overload vs. time curve is reasonably valid for 50 and 60 Hz designs.

Reminds me of one company promoting 400-Hz motors (and associated 3-phase alternators) for applications like concrete drilling. Here's a 7.5 HP (5.6 kW) motor weighing 16 lbs (7.3 kg): Link2
Back to top
Mads Barnkob
Wed Sept 23 2015, 06:23AM
Mads Barnkob Registered Member #1403 Joined: Tue Mar 18 2008, 06:05PM
Location: Denmark, Odense C
Posts: 1968
klugesmith wrote ...

Mads Barnkob wrote ...
See page 1 for a overload curve, %overload vs. time Link2,%20M5%20,%20M10,%20and%20M20%20Variac% 20Autotransformers.pdf
Great reference there, Mads.
It's for a series of 400 Hz products, which is how a 3 kVA autotransformer can weigh in at only 13 pounds.
I bet the overload vs. time curve is reasonably valid for 50 and 60 Hz designs.

Reminds me of one company promoting 400-Hz motors (and associated 3-phase alternators) for applications like concrete drilling. Here's a 7.5 HP (5.6 kW) motor weighing 16 lbs (7.3 kg): Link2


The 400Hz rating slipped my eye, it was the first curve I found :)

I remember seeing other curves where it was more conservative, as in 300% maximum overload at 30 seconds, 200% for 5 minutes .
Back to top
Ash Small
Wed Sept 23 2015, 09:36AM
Ash Small Registered Member #3414 Joined: Sun Nov 14 2010, 05:05PM
Location: UK
Posts: 4245
klugesmith wrote ...


It's for a series of 400 Hz products, which is how a 3 kVA autotransformer can weigh in at only 13 pounds.
I bet the overload vs. time curve is reasonably valid for 50 and 60 Hz designs.

Reminds me of one company promoting 400-Hz motors (and associated 3-phase alternators) for applications like concrete drilling. Here's a 7.5 HP (5.6 kW) motor weighing 16 lbs (7.3 kg): Link2


450Hz is commonly used on aircraft, for this very reason.

50/60Hz was only chosen for mains supply because it was the limit of technology (3000-3600RPM) at the time the decision was taken.

(I live in 50Hz land, but regularly crank my 7.5kVA 50Hz generator up to 3600RPM, 60Hz@300V)
Back to top
Signification
Thu Sept 24 2015, 04:27AM
Signification Registered Member #54278 Joined: Sat Jan 17 2015, 04:42AM
Location: Amite, La.
Posts: 367
Hazmatt_(The Underdog) wrote ...

HAHAHAH yea, I pulled 220A from a 30A breaker for 3 seconds.


220A, where 30A is intended, would set a lot of fires in 3 long seconds. yea?
Back to top
klugesmith
Thu Sept 24 2015, 05:41AM
klugesmith Registered Member #2099 Joined: Wed Apr 29 2009, 12:22AM
Location: Los Altos, California
Posts: 1714
220A, where 30A is intended, would set a lot of fires in 3 long seconds. yea?
Nay. The rate of temperature rise is limited by the thermal mass of the copper wire.

Suppose the circuit uses AWG 10 copper wire, which in ordinary applications can carry 30 amps forever.
For short circuit calculations where the wire is initially at 75 degrees C, and can briefly withstand 150 degrees C,
the I-squared-t rating for AWG10 is about 300,000 ampere-squared-seconds.
For example:
  • 100 A for 30 seconds

  • 1000 A for 0.3 seconds

  • 220 A for 6 seconds.

Protection device is supposed to interrupt the circuit sooner than that.

This was discussed at 4hv about a year ago: Link2
Back to top
Signification
Fri Sept 25 2015, 07:15AM
Signification Registered Member #54278 Joined: Sat Jan 17 2015, 04:42AM
Location: Amite, La.
Posts: 367
klugesmith wrote ...

220A, where 30A is intended, would set a lot of fires in 3 long seconds. yea?
Nay. The rate of temperature rise is limited by the thermal mass of the copper wire.

Suppose the circuit uses AWG 10 copper wire, which in ordinary applications can carry 30 amps forever.
For short circuit calculations where the wire is initially at 75 degrees C, and can briefly withstand 150 degrees C,
the I-squared-t rating for AWG10 is about 300,000 ampere-squared-seconds.
For example:
  • 100 A for 30 seconds

  • 1000 A for 0.3 seconds

  • 220 A for 6 seconds.

Protection device is supposed to interrupt the circuit sooner than that.

This was discussed at 4hv about a year ago: Link2


I have always wanted to learn about that (I^2)t stuff. All I need is a tiny little push. I can easily handle the rate of temperature rise (dT/dt), thermal mass of materials, and can do the thermal calculations for proper heat sinks, given the thermal resistance (deg/W), in steps from junction to ambient).

In fact (kludgesmith), your comment made a big difference. A lot of this started when I was trying to learn about the so-called ("ACTION INTEGRAL") usually associated with SCR's.

In fact, this "action integral", mostly what i saw by -electroholic-, way before I joined, was reason for my VERY FIRST post here!! and a main reason I joined--Of course, now I see there is so much more here!!

EDIT, OK--got it--thanks kludgesmith. Now for that 'action integral' application.
Back to top
 1 2 3

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.