Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 36
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
All today's birthdays', congrats!
Matthew T. (35)
Amrit Deshmukh (60)


Next birthdays
05/05 Alexandre (32)
05/07 a.gutzeit (63)
05/08 wpk5008 (34)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: General Science and Electronics
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

CSU Chico Tilt Rotor Flying Machine, (Airframe and Electronics, 2 of 3).

Move Thread LAN_403
Patrick
Wed Jun 13 2012, 03:01AM
Patrick Registered Member #2431 Joined: Tue Oct 13 2009, 09:47PM
Location: Chico, CA. USA
Posts: 5639
AndrewM wrote ...


I think you are still failing to understand Steve's comment.

Have you tried drawing a force diagram? I am interested to see if you can locate the restoring moment you assume exists.

I realize i maynot have a full grasp on the statics or dynamics at hand, but lengthening the vertical moment arm did have a profound efffect on pitch and stability... it not perfect and 3 inches, but its flyable and manageble..

ill will draw a free body diagram as soon as i figure it out, but i want some evaluation from others on the situation.

im totally exhausted, ready for bed...
Back to top
AndrewM
Wed Jun 13 2012, 04:05AM
AndrewM Registered Member #49 Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 04:05AM
Location: Bigass Pile of Penguins
Posts: 362
Patrick wrote ...

AndrewM wrote ...


I think you are still failing to understand Steve's comment.

Have you tried drawing a force diagram? I am interested to see if you can locate the restoring moment you assume exists.

I realize i maynot have a full grasp on the statics or dynamics at hand, but lengthening the vertical moment arm did have a profound efffect on pitch and stability... it not perfect and 3 inches, but its flyable and manageble..

ill will draw a free body diagram as soon as i figure it out, but i want some evaluation from others on the situation.

im totally exhausted, ready for bed...

Well I'll just give you the answer - increasing the arm length increased your moment of inertia (by a factor of 4) so your instability just progressed 4x slower. But there is no possible "pendulum" effect in your system.
Back to top
Patrick
Wed Jun 13 2012, 04:09AM
Patrick Registered Member #2431 Joined: Tue Oct 13 2009, 09:47PM
Location: Chico, CA. USA
Posts: 5639
AndrewM wrote ...


Well I'll just give you the answer - increasing the arm length increased your moment of inertia (by a factor of 4) so your instability just progressed 4x slower. But there is no possible "pendulum" effect in your system.

ok, but that gives my gyros and PID loops time to put the commands on the servos, and gives the mechanical train time to alter the forces, right?

after all it can be made to work... Link2


Back to top
AndrewM
Wed Jun 13 2012, 05:27AM
AndrewM Registered Member #49 Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 04:05AM
Location: Bigass Pile of Penguins
Posts: 362
Absolutely, lots of the flying toys you see now are statically unstable. Active control makes short work of the issue provided you have enough inertia to give it time to react.
Back to top
Patrick
Wed Jun 13 2012, 06:16AM
Patrick Registered Member #2431 Joined: Tue Oct 13 2009, 09:47PM
Location: Chico, CA. USA
Posts: 5639
Ok so i was wrong about the reasoning (the pendulum) but i was right that increasing the distance bewtween the CL and CG that the time of instability is longer? right?
Back to top
Steve Conner
Wed Jun 13 2012, 06:19AM
Steve Conner Registered Member #30 Joined: Fri Feb 03 2006, 10:52AM
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
Posts: 6706
Well, congrats on getting it to fly! smile
Back to top
Patrick
Wed Jun 13 2012, 06:38AM
Patrick Registered Member #2431 Joined: Tue Oct 13 2009, 09:47PM
Location: Chico, CA. USA
Posts: 5639
Steve Conner wrote ...

Well, congrats on getting it to fly! smile
yeah and as unstable as it is, we only broke one of the cheap servos... so now its will soon be time for the Savox servos and good 11" props! i just need to make it more stable.
Back to top
Carbon_Rod
Wed Jun 13 2012, 08:32AM
Carbon_Rod Registered Member #65 Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 06:43AM
Location:
Posts: 1155
Note attaching a balanced wooden stick on a hinge to the airframe with string will provide a "safe" platform for calibration (or finding cg). Without this simple rig people tend to chew through more props etc.

Out of all the sensors, you will likely find a good 3-axis compass provides cleaner data.
However, large metal beams/cars will cause interference (most GPS units also suffer precision loss in urban settings).

Cheers,
Back to top
AndrewM
Wed Jun 13 2012, 02:38PM
AndrewM Registered Member #49 Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 04:05AM
Location: Bigass Pile of Penguins
Posts: 362
Patrick wrote ...

Ok so i was wrong about the reasoning (the pendulum) but i was right that increasing the distance bewtween the CL and CG that the time of instability is longer? right?

Yep.


Carbon_Rod wrote ...

Note attaching a balanced wooden stick on a hinge to the airframe with string will provide a "safe" platform for calibration (or finding cg). Without this simple rig people tend to chew through more props etc.

This idea also reminded me - you might consider attaching a number of 4' long wooden sticks to your models primary axes. These will greatly increase your moments of inertia while adding fairly little mass. It will be much easier to fly and tune.

An example is these popular coaxial helicopters:
250

There is, in fact, nothing inside that fail boom; its just a thin plastic shell. However its not purely decorative; without that boom it is completely unflyable as the gyro and control loop cannot damp the oscillations.
Back to top
Josh Campbell
Wed Jun 13 2012, 03:45PM
Josh Campbell Registered Member #5258 Joined: Sun Jun 10 2012, 10:15PM
Location: Missouri - USA
Posts: 119
Can't wait to see some videos of this design in action! (Maybe YouTube so file size would not be an issue...) Congrats on getting it to fly. :)
Back to top

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.