Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 37
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
All today's birthdays', congrats!
GODSFUSION (37)
Zajcek (37)
ElectroDog (33)
sportcoupe (56)


Next birthdays
04/30 BlakFyre (36)
04/30 SENTRY (31)
05/01 Shaun (34)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: Electromagnetic Projectile Accelerators
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

Cheaper induction CG?

Move Thread LAN_403
mike0t4ever
Fri Mar 17 2006, 04:33AM
mike0t4ever Registered Member #321 Joined: Wed Mar 15 2006, 03:33AM
Location:
Posts: 14
QS: thanks for clarifying my response

Funky: in the ieee papers on coilguns (most of which are induction guns) alot of guns use one capbank/coil (at least those powered by caps)

keep in mind that the current levels can be much larger than in reluctance(iron slug) guns
the reason for that is that a conductive projectile in a coil can be thought of as a shorted n:1 transformer
Back to top
Quantum Singularity
Fri Mar 17 2006, 04:19PM
Quantum Singularity Registered Member #158 Joined: Sun Feb 12 2006, 09:53PM
Location: Central Ohio
Posts: 282
I am no expert when it comes to the engineering principles of coilguns, but I would think by design the induction cg utilizes quicker pulses than a reluctance based cg. And thats probably why I get blazing speed from a 120uF cap and only 8 turn coil. I doubt using those parameters I could make as efficient of cg using the reluctance method and a ferro-magnetic projectile. So then an induction cg might demand a pulse rated cap more so than the reluctance variety. I guess most cg's using a cheaper electrolytic bank are probably reluctance. I guess I am not sure if I have ever seen an induction design that used electrolytics... has anyone used or seen this? Or are all of them pulse-cap or similarly powered?
Back to top
Yohan
Fri Mar 17 2006, 06:26PM
Yohan Registered Member #194 Joined: Fri Feb 17 2006, 07:52PM
Location:
Posts: 19
It all depends on the current you wish to obtain and that is regulated by the esr and esl in your system.

Make no mistake, reluctance systems use very quick pulses too. Because the payload is a lot heavier for a SRLA system, it will require more stages to accelerate the armature to the speeds the induction CG can do with a few because the system will tear itself apart. As the slug reaches faster speeds toward the latter stages, those pulses need to be short as well.

Ultimately, you would want a power supply capable of delivering your desired pulse at a constant voltage based on an eventual steady state current you wish to achieve. This is impossible to do with SCR's and sparkgaps because you can't turn them off. So, you have to adjust your pulse lengths by circuit parameters. e.g. adding or removing caps and turns.

We used a bank of lytics for this very purpose in conjuction with IGBT's. They weren't pulse rated but they did the job just fine. I believe some of our pulses ended up no more than 500us in the last stages at roughly 1-2ka pulses.

EDIT: Where are the efficiencies at with induction CG's?
Back to top
mike0t4ever
Sat Mar 18 2006, 03:54AM
mike0t4ever Registered Member #321 Joined: Wed Mar 15 2006, 03:33AM
Location:
Posts: 14
in most of what i've read they use pulse caps (non-polarized oil/film)

also using an approach where by having a very underdamped circuit you can reverse charge the cap and reuse the energy later (don't need a more complicated diag-half bridge)

another advantage of induction guns is no saturation effects
and the coil can be shorter than the projectile (in quite a few designs this was a common feature)


iirc some efficiencies are as high as 50% and higher,search in the ieee transactions on magnetics
(part of it is that larger guns are intrinsically more efficient but also out of our reach)


EDIT:
this was found here (i put the stars around the good part)
Abstract:

Recent advances in energy storage, switching and magnet technology
make electromagnetic acceleration a viable alternative to chemical
propulsion for certain tasks, and a means to perform other tasks not
previously feasible. Applications include the acceleration of gram-
size particles for hypervelocity research and the initiation of
fusion by impact, a replacement for chemically propelled artillery,
the transportation of cargo and personnel over inaccessible terrain,
and the launching of space vehicles to supply massive space
operations, and for the disposal of nuclear waste. The simplest
launcher of interest is the railgun, in which a short-circuit slide
or an arc is driven along two rails by direct current. ******The most
sophisticated studied thus far is the mass driver, in which a
superconducting shuttle bucket is accelerated by a line of pulse
coils energized by capacitors at energy conversion efficiencies
better than 90%. ******Other accelerators of interest include helical,
brush-commutated motors, discrete coil arc commutated drivers, flux
compression momentum transformers, and various hybrid electrochemical
devices. (Author)

CASI Accession Number: 80A51229 Pages: 00003

Back to top

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.