Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 16
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
No birthdays today

Next birthdays
05/04 Matthew T. (35)
05/04 Amrit Deshmukh (60)
05/05 Alexandre (32)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: Projects
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

High power EM projectile launcher

 1 2 3 4  last
Move Thread LAN_403
Kizmo
Sun Apr 12 2015, 09:05PM
Kizmo Registered Member #599 Joined: Thu Mar 22 2007, 07:40PM
Location: Northern Finland, Rovaniemi
Posts: 624
Todays experiments:

several shots at 800VDC 5.6kJ

First shot:
- 10.6µH coil, 192g disk
- Measured velocity over 800mm travel 60m/s
- Kinetic energy 346J, efficiency 6.2%

Second shot:
- 10.6µH coil, 192g disk, 85g additional non metallic load on the disk
- Measured velocity over 800mm travel 60m/s
- Kinetic energy 497J, efficinecy 8.9%

I also did couple shots with 40µH coil but performance was much worse. I think next coil i will try will be around 8µH and made from super heavy wire. Current coil is made from two parallel 2½mm^2 copper wires and it gets rather warm after couple shots.

Right now 60m/s seems to be difficult to beat, but funny thing is that i can add quit a lot of weight in the aluminum disk and it still flies 60m/s cheesey
Back to top
hen918
Mon Apr 13 2015, 05:59PM
hen918 Registered Member #11591 Joined: Wed Mar 20 2013, 08:20PM
Location: UK
Posts: 556
what do you use to dump the back EMF? some big-ass diodes?
Back to top
Kizmo
Mon Apr 13 2015, 06:14PM
Kizmo Registered Member #599 Joined: Thu Mar 22 2007, 07:40PM
Location: Northern Finland, Rovaniemi
Posts: 624
hen918 wrote ...

what do you use to dump the back EMF? some big-ass diodes?
Nothing. :)

(well, not true. I dont disconnect my charger and it has 50R series resistance on DC side so any negative voltage will be bled away by the rectifier bridge)

I did some more testing today and find out interesting thing: My chinese scale was reading wrong from the beginning. The 125g disk was actually 192g and so on angry I have updated earlier posts with correct numbers

Also made 390g disk:
1428948738 599 FT170386 390g




192g disk at 4kJ in, 346J to kinetic energy
Back to top
Uspring
Tue Apr 14 2015, 08:53AM
Uspring Registered Member #3988 Joined: Thu Jul 07 2011, 03:25PM
Location:
Posts: 711
Right now 60m/s seems to be difficult to beat, but funny thing is that i can add quit a lot of weight in the aluminum disk and it still flies 60m/s
Possibly the disk takes off long before the field has reached max. More mass implies slower takeoff and a perhaps a higher field before the disk leaves the range of the field. That would also explain the lower performance for your larger inductance coils, since there the field builds up even slower. But the lower performance might also be due to the larger resistance.
Back to top
Hydron
Tue Apr 14 2015, 12:54PM
Hydron Registered Member #30656 Joined: Tue Jul 30 2013, 02:40AM
Location: UK
Posts: 208
Chucking the coil in some liquid nitrogen could be interesting, dramatically lowers the resistance.
Back to top
Kizmo
Tue Apr 14 2015, 04:24PM
Kizmo Registered Member #599 Joined: Thu Mar 22 2007, 07:40PM
Location: Northern Finland, Rovaniemi
Posts: 624
I am planning to build about 10µH coil that is wound with copper flat bar or perhaps flattened water pipe.
Back to top
Sulaiman
Tue Apr 14 2015, 04:52PM
Sulaiman Registered Member #162 Joined: Mon Feb 13 2006, 10:25AM
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 3140
from the few small experiments that I have done
and noting performance of various EM launchers
it seems to me that increasing mass usually increases efficiency
with two problems;
great lumps of metal with lots of momentum as well as energy
unimpressive projectile speed.

I can speculate, but I don't actually KNOW why this is,
one of those laws of nature things ?

Back to top
hen918
Tue Apr 14 2015, 05:02PM
hen918 Registered Member #11591 Joined: Wed Mar 20 2013, 08:20PM
Location: UK
Posts: 556
Kizmo wrote ...

I am planning to build about 10µH coil that is wound with copper flat bar or perhaps flattened water pipe.

I can recommend flattened water-pipe. I used micro-bore pipe, wound in a spiral, for my can crusher / launcher. It worked well un-enclosed, but I noticed it was getting more bent and out of line every shot, so I 3D printed a surround for it and epoxied it in. Since then it's been on the back-burner and I haven't gotten around to removing the thick layer of plastic covering the coil.
Back to top
Kizmo
Tue Apr 14 2015, 05:18PM
Kizmo Registered Member #599 Joined: Thu Mar 22 2007, 07:40PM
Location: Northern Finland, Rovaniemi
Posts: 624
Sulaiman wrote ...

great lumps of metal with lots of momentum as well as energy
unimpressive projectile speed,
more like artillery than small arms.

It is still very impressive bang.. kind of scary cheesey

I managed to hit c-clamp that was holding my projectile stopper together. Disk was stopped but the clamp got launched and it smashed ccfl tube from ceiling light fixture


1429031891 599 FT170386 E3m4xtg
Back to top
Ash Small
Tue Apr 14 2015, 08:23PM
Ash Small Registered Member #3414 Joined: Sun Nov 14 2010, 05:05PM
Location: UK
Posts: 4245
Sulaiman wrote ...

.it seems to me that increasing mass usually increases efficiency
.
I can speculate, but I don't actually KNOW why this is,
one of those laws of nature things ?



As Udo pointed out, if it's heavier, it will stay in the field being accelerated for longer.

I assume that while it is in the 'field' it is adding to the inductance, The more mass, the greater the inductance, and the longer the pulse lasts, also, a light disc will leave the field (and stop being accelerated) quicker, so won't be accelerated for as long as a heavier disc.

Maybe the 'law of nature' is to do with a heavier disc being accelerated for longer, so extra mass just means it's accelerated for longer, therefore mass has no bearing on velocity?

Obviously this would only hold true up to a certain point, the point I'm making is that as mass increases, efficiency increases, up to a point.
Back to top
 1 2 3 4  last

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.