Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 22
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
No birthdays today

Next birthdays
04/28 Steve Conner (46)
04/29 GODSFUSION (37)
04/29 Zajcek (37)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: High Voltage
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

Do you know any good HV diodes that perfrom well at upper KHz - lower MHz rf frequencies?

 1 2 3 
Move Thread LAN_403
Patrick
Fri Aug 22 2014, 12:12AM
Patrick Registered Member #2431 Joined: Tue Oct 13 2009, 09:47PM
Location: Chico, CA. USA
Posts: 5639
so Ash, if we have multiple series'ed diodes to get upto our HV, then we should have some nH in stray incductance hanging around. if we lay up a simple RLCD || TVS then we would have scalabe module that could be tested...


1408667876 2431 FT1630 Rlcd
you could put these modules together, pretty long. there would be 3 discrete componets, the resistor, diode and TVS, the induction and capacitence would be stray, from the PCB.

edit: i meant to put the resistor in parallel, as a volteg divider with 500k or so... ugh!
Back to top
Steve Conner
Fri Aug 22 2014, 06:55AM
Steve Conner Registered Member #30 Joined: Fri Feb 03 2006, 10:52AM
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
Posts: 6706
Diode reverse recovery is quite simple. When the diode has been conducting, the junction is left full of electrons and holes. When the voltage across it reverses, it keeps on conducting in the "wrong" direction until these charge carriers are cleared out.

That is why reverse recovery behaviour is quoted as a charge, because you have to get a fixed amount of charge cleared out to turn the diode off. You can do it as a huge spike of current, or a smaller current for a longer time.

The amount of charge is not fixed though, it depends on how much forward current the diode was conducting in the few microseconds before turn-off.
Back to top
Ash Small
Fri Aug 22 2014, 10:42AM
Ash Small Registered Member #3414 Joined: Sun Nov 14 2010, 05:05PM
Location: UK
Posts: 4245
Thanks for reminding us Steve.

I've just been reading up on Schottkys again, and apparently 1700V silicon carbide Schottkys have been available for a few years now.

Link2
Back to top
Proud Mary
Fri Aug 22 2014, 12:48PM
Proud Mary Registered Member #543 Joined: Tue Feb 20 2007, 04:26PM
Location: UK
Posts: 4992
EY51 is a super little directly-heated EHT diode rectifier, with ratings up to 500 kHz. You can find them easily enough on ebay for £5.

X-rays will start to get through the glass envelope > 14 kV (my experimental finding)
Back to top
Patrick
Fri Aug 22 2014, 10:56PM
Patrick Registered Member #2431 Joined: Tue Oct 13 2009, 09:47PM
Location: Chico, CA. USA
Posts: 5639
Steve Conner wrote ...

Diode reverse recovery is quite simple. When the diode has been conducting, the junction is left full of electrons and holes. When the voltage across it reverses, it keeps on conducting in the "wrong" direction until these charge carriers are cleared out.

That is why reverse recovery behaviour is quoted as a charge, because you have to get a fixed amount of charge cleared out to turn the diode off. You can do it as a huge spike of current, or a smaller current for a longer time.

The amount of charge is not fixed though, it depends on how much forward current the diode was conducting in the few microseconds before turn-off.
so the reverse recovery can be treated as resistive heat loss after the blocking moment is complete?
Back to top
Ash Small
Sat Aug 23 2014, 02:30PM
Ash Small Registered Member #3414 Joined: Sun Nov 14 2010, 05:05PM
Location: UK
Posts: 4245
Patrick wrote ...

so the reverse recovery can be treated as resistive heat loss after the blocking moment is complete?


I worked this all out in a thread about a year ago, at least as far as how NPN transistors work, and a diode is a transistor with the base and emitter connected.

You have to upset the equilibrium that exists after the junction is formed by removing a few valence band electrons from the collector side of the junction before electrons will start to cross the junction, and until those valence band electrons are replaced, current can flow.

Of course, in reality, they are constantly being replaced and others are being removed, but this replacement process takes time, due to the random nature of electron movement/energy, etc.

Most electrons remain in the conduction layer, rather than dropping into the valence layer, due to energy levels, etc.

So called 'hole theory' is the mathematical model that best describes it.
Back to top
Steve Conner
Sat Aug 23 2014, 02:44PM
Steve Conner Registered Member #30 Joined: Fri Feb 03 2006, 10:52AM
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
Posts: 6706
Yes and no. For the first part of the recovery, the diode looks like a dead short. If the diode is supposed to be handing over conduction to a transistor, this can cause high current and resistive losses in the transistor. This is a common problem in boost converters and bridges driving loads with a leading power factor.

What happens next depends on the diode. Modern "soft recovery" ones have a smoothly damped turn-off that causes resistive losses in the diode itself. However some older fast recovery diodes would snap off pretty much instantaneously. Gold-doped signal diodes like the 1N4148 still do this, the turn-off is so fast that they can generate energy up to hundreds of MHz. This behaviour is deliberately enhanced in the "step recovery diode" which is used as a pulse generator.

Schottky diodes have no reverse recovery charge at all. They do have junction capacitance though, which can cause similar problems.

Tube rectifiers essentially behave the same as Schottkies.
Back to top
Patrick
Sat Aug 23 2014, 03:46PM
Patrick Registered Member #2431 Joined: Tue Oct 13 2009, 09:47PM
Location: Chico, CA. USA
Posts: 5639
heres what i really meant before my brain stalled above...


1408808819 2431 FT165464 Rlcd
R= 10M ohm, for voltage balancing with its seriesed peers.
C= stray, keep small.
L= stray, keep small.
TVS= breakover at 800v? (i should have drawn this as unidirectional right?, since theres another diode. )
D= HER108 (1kV, 1 amp) or spec'ed better as needed.

EDIT: i think they raised the price on the HER108 since i bought my 750 pieces. there now 14.9 cents.

Then build these out in iterations, possible in oil or epoxy, i think 600 V per module would be reliable, and resistant to blow out.

My interest in all this is for high effciency EHV switch mode power supplies using ferrite transformers at 100-300kHz. But they would require full wave rectification.
Back to top
Ash Small
Sat Aug 23 2014, 05:52PM
Ash Small Registered Member #3414 Joined: Sun Nov 14 2010, 05:05PM
Location: UK
Posts: 4245
Steve Conner wrote ...

Yes and no. For the first part of the recovery, the diode looks like a dead short. If the diode is supposed to be handing over conduction to a transistor, this can cause high current and resistive losses in the transistor. This is a common problem in boost converters and bridges driving loads with a leading power factor.

What happens next depends on the diode. Modern "soft recovery" ones have a smoothly damped turn-off that causes resistive losses in the diode itself. However some older fast recovery diodes would snap off pretty much instantaneously. Gold-doped signal diodes like the 1N4148 still do this, the turn-off is so fast that they can generate energy up to hundreds of MHz. This behaviour is deliberately enhanced in the "step recovery diode" which is used as a pulse generator.

Schottky diodes have no reverse recovery charge at all. They do have junction capacitance though, which can cause similar problems.

Tube rectifiers essentially behave the same as Schottkies.

I imagine the reason why Schottky diodes, which have junctions formed from a metal and a semi-conductor, and gold doped diodes have such short reverse recovery times is due to the metals in the junction, or more specifically, the differences in the valence band electrons associated with the metal atoms.
Back to top
Proud Mary
Tue Aug 26 2014, 08:21AM
Proud Mary Registered Member #543 Joined: Tue Feb 20 2007, 04:26PM
Location: UK
Posts: 4992
I've got loads of 1970s TV EHT diodes which I'll give away for the price of a donation to 4HV.
Back to top
 1 2 3 

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.