Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 16
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
One birthday today, congrats!
a.gutzeit (63)


Next birthdays
05/08 wpk5008 (34)
05/09 Alfons (36)
05/09 Coronafix (51)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: Tesla Coils
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

Basic SGTC questions

 1 2 3 
Move Thread LAN_403
Steve Conner
Sat Aug 02 2014, 09:27AM
Steve Conner Registered Member #30 Joined: Fri Feb 03 2006, 10:52AM
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
Posts: 6706
Yes, I used several chokes in series just to reduce the voltage stress on each one. The chokes all survived the ordeal, 2 of them ended up in a valve hi-fi amp.

The impedance of the charging circuit is rather high due to the high voltage and low current, so you need more inductance for the charging choke than you think, but it's not really too critical. IIRC the resonant frequency between the charging choke and tank capacitor should be about one-half of the break rate you intend to run at.

If the inductance is too small, you'll get power arcing in the rotary gap because the capacitor will charge up before the electrodes have separated enough to hold off the voltage. I had some trouble with this, but only at lower gap RPM than I normally used. The effect was simply to blow the mains fuse.

As Hydron points out, it is probably more economical to use 2 MOTs driving a voltage doubler, than a single MOT driving a quadrupler as I did, but this was really more of a fun exercise to see how much power could be got from a single MOT.

The Tesla-2 was a great coil, it made some pretty big sparks and sounded like an air-raid siren. I only gave up on it because the rotary gap self-destructed (the motor bearings were shot and the electrodes melted) and the secondary got badly burnt.
Back to top
Ash Small
Sat Aug 02 2014, 01:58PM
Ash Small Registered Member #3414 Joined: Sun Nov 14 2010, 05:05PM
Location: UK
Posts: 4245
Ok, I was going to just use one MOT for the same reason as you, Steve, but I think I'll go with the concensus and use two.

Presumably this means I can use the original microwave oven doubler circuits? Presumably I can wire them up for +/-5kV approx.?

I assume max break rate is a function of current/capacitance of tank capacitor?

(I think resonant frequency/2 < max break rate, because you only need one half cycle to charge the tank capacitor, although I did read something on Ritchie's site that implied that it's possible to run a faster break rate than this and still obtain full operating voltage, but I'd need to re-read it to fully understand all the implications)

I'm wondering if the reason the bearings failed in your RSG was due to EDM (electro-discharge machining), possibly indirectly due to induced currents?...but this is speculation. I'm considering maybe driving the RSG via a belt drive (I'd still need to mount it on a bearing), and using a variac to control RPM.

I only have one 2.5A variac, so this would mean using another method to reduce input power if I want to test the TC at reduced power.
Back to top
Hydron
Sun Aug 03 2014, 06:54AM
Hydron Registered Member #30656 Joined: Tue Jul 30 2013, 02:40AM
Location: UK
Posts: 208
The standard microwave doubler circuit is no good for tesla coils anyway (has extreme ripple on the output). Check out this wikipedia page: Link2 , there are a few methods there (including the circuit Steve used for his quadrupler).

The "bridge" circuit is the standard (and most economical) option for voltage doubling without large ripple, but has the disadvantage in this situation of not having the output nicely centered around ground (it will float up and down by ~2kV AC). This is not ideal but may be acceptable given the simplicity and lowest parts count.

Your two options if you want a supply centered around ground are to use one MOT in the same configuration as Steve, or two MOTs, each with a "Greinacher" circuit (one of each polarity). This would look rather similar to Steve's circuit and require the same components, with the advantage being the greater potential power from two transformers rather than one.

If you had to go with Steve's circuit or the Greinacher circuit then you probably could re-use the microwave oven cap for the first stage (doing exactly the same job as it did in the oven), but the microwave oven diodes may not be able to handle the peak currents, and second stage "peak detect" portion would have to use larger capacitors (many series electrolytics with conservative rating and careful balancing, or a number of series/parallel matched microwave caps) and diodes (same considerations as with the electrolytic caps). A "bridge" circuit would require the same parts as the "peak detect" portion of the other options. Those with greater experience may be able to weigh in on the question of whether the microwave oven diodes are re-usable.
Back to top
Steve Conner
Sun Aug 03 2014, 09:08AM
Steve Conner Registered Member #30 Joined: Fri Feb 03 2006, 10:52AM
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
Posts: 6706
Re the lack of a variac: I used a universal motor for my RSG, and a dimmer switch rated for inductive loads (low voltage halogen lights etc) to control the speed of it. This freed up the variac to control the input to the MOT.

Once I was confident with it, I ditched the variac and used a relay from a microwave oven, controlled by a big red button, to switch the MOT directly onto the mains.

Ash, I'm pretty sure I still have the voltage multiplier and de-Qing diode stack from Tesla-2 kicking around somewhere if you would like them. It should be easy to modify the multiplier to take input from two MOTs.
Back to top
Hydron
Sun Aug 03 2014, 11:03AM
Hydron Registered Member #30656 Joined: Tue Jul 30 2013, 02:40AM
Location: UK
Posts: 208
I'd take Steve up on his kind offer!

Should be extremely easy to use the remains of Tesla-2 - just split the connection between the first two capacitors, feed one from each MOT, the center connection remains as ground (connect to both cores). Or you can just use one MOT as Steve did, and graduate to two if you need more power.

The beauty of a DC coil is that theoretically a ballast and variac are unnecessary - the choke stops the gap from power arcing and the power level can be set by the break rate rather than the input voltage.

All that said, do what Steve suggested - you want a variac for initial powerup, and even your 2.5A one should be enough for limited runs at lower break rates, with the option to ditch it and connect straight to the mains once it's running well.
Back to top
Ash Small
Sun Aug 03 2014, 02:18PM
Ash Small Registered Member #3414 Joined: Sun Nov 14 2010, 05:05PM
Location: UK
Posts: 4245
Hydron wrote ...

The standard microwave doubler circuit is no good for tesla coils anyway (has extreme ripple on the output). Check out this wikipedia page: Link2 , there are a few methods there (including the circuit Steve used for his quadrupler).


Yep, I was studying that page again last night, before I came up with this:

1407008636 3414 FT0 Voltage Doubler


Which I posted in a thread in the HV section (thread here: Link2 ). I posted it in a separate thread in case it was a non-starter, but the consensus is that it should work pretty much 'as is'. (I am planning to use a string of electrolytics for the output stage, if I try this circuit)

Steve Conner wrote ...


Ash, I'm pretty sure I still have the voltage multiplier and de-Qing diode stack from Tesla-2 kicking around somewhere if you would like them. It should be easy to modify the multiplier to take input from two MOTs.

I'll PM you Steve, thanks. I want to try using the microwave oven parts, and see what happens, but I imagine modifying your old quadrupler will be an improvement. Will the de-Qing diode be up to the job, though? I think I'll have (potentially) ~twice the current your Tesla 2 had, obviously depending on tank capacitor and break rate, etc.

The next job will be tackling the maths regarding tank capacitor, Fres, break rate, secondary and topload, etc., and working out how much inductance I need for DC resonant charging. All this will require a bit more research......
Back to top
Ash Small
Sun Aug 03 2014, 11:44PM
Ash Small Registered Member #3414 Joined: Sun Nov 14 2010, 05:05PM
Location: UK
Posts: 4245
Continuing on from my last post, Intuition suggests I go for a big toroid, maybe one metre diameter by 30cm high. If this turns out to be too big for breakout to occur, I then have two choices, either introduce a 'breakout point', or increase the capacitance of the primary tank capacitor, as, from what I've read, it is the ratio of these two capacitances that determines the voltage in the secondary tank circuit.

From what I've read, secondary coil height should equal toriod diameter, so secondary height then becomes one metre.

I want to keep copper losses to a minimum, so go for 1mm diameter wire, enamelled, I'll do some maths later on regarding skin depth, once frequency has been established.

I then need to establish diameter of secondary. This will determines Fres.

(These are just some thoughts I've had sitting here enjoying a bottle of wine on a Sunday evening. Any comments on the above 'thoughts' will be welcomed. I'll post again in the morning.)

EDIT: Maybe 30cm is a bit big, 20cm (8") or so may be a bit more aesthetic, although I seem to keep reading that people eiter try a bigger toroid and get better results, or add a second toroid and get better results. I assume most people use one of the simulations or whatever to decide toroid size, but then get better results when they add more capacitance. I've also not found much in the way of deciding toroid size on any of the sites I've tried. Ritchie's doesn't say much. Steve Connor's pretty much just says 'it worked better when we tried a bigger toroid', Terry's site is down, etc., although I have read that if the toroid is too big and no breakout occurs, 'add a breakout point, or add more primary tank capacitance.

I'll probably try one of the simulations, though, once I've got some initial numbers to input.
Back to top
Hydron
Mon Aug 04 2014, 10:43AM
Hydron Registered Member #30656 Joined: Tue Jul 30 2013, 02:40AM
Location: UK
Posts: 208
For reference, my DRSSTC spits out ~2m streamers/arcs with a 160x700mm (dia.xheight) secondary and a 160x750mm (heightxdia.) toroid, and could probably be pushed a bit further if I play with the current limit.

You should be able to get at least close to that streamer length with a spark gap and a similar sized coil, but I suspect it would be pushing a two MOT supply to try a larger coil.

If anyone else has comments on this, please reply, I've never built a spark gap coil, though I did do all the research into it about a decade ago.
Back to top
Steve Conner
Mon Aug 04 2014, 01:43PM
Steve Conner Registered Member #30 Joined: Fri Feb 03 2006, 10:52AM
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
Posts: 6706
This is the biggest spark I got out of Tesla-2. Link2 For reference the secondary is 20" tall. I used almost 3x the bang energy the coil was designed for, and ended up burning out both the spark gap electrodes and the secondary. The single MOT power supply was probably delivering something like 2.5kW.

Re toroid size: the classical guideline is that the minor diameter of the toroid should be equal to the diameter of the secondary, and the major diameter equal to the height of the secondary. You won't go far wrong following this. Most people (myself included smile ) allow themselves to be influenced by whatever parts they can find to make a topload.
Back to top
Ash Small
Mon Aug 04 2014, 01:50PM
Ash Small Registered Member #3414 Joined: Sun Nov 14 2010, 05:05PM
Location: UK
Posts: 4245
Hydron wrote ...

For reference, my DRSSTC spits out ~2m streamers/arcs with a 160x700mm (dia.xheight) secondary and a 160x750mm (heightxdia.) toroid, and could probably be pushed a bit further if I play with the current limit.

You should be able to get at least close to that streamer length with a spark gap and a similar sized coil, but I suspect it would be pushing a two MOT supply to try a larger coil.

If anyone else has comments on this, please reply, I've never built a spark gap coil, though I did do all the research into it about a decade ago.

I'd also be interested in comments from others regarding this subject.

The dimensions of your coil/topload sound about the minimum I'd want to try. (Intuition tells me I want a big toroid and a secondary with low copper losses)

I assume decreasing the break rate would compensate to some extent the effects of a large primary capacitor, although another option would be to just add more MOT's and doublers. Increasing primary tank cap also means I can use a smaller choke in the resonant charging circuit..

Any further comments will be appreciated.

EDIT: Missed your post as I was writing my reply, Steve. Thanks for the input. That photo is what I was referring to when I said you got better results by increasing the size of the topload wink
Back to top
 1 2 3 

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.