Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 40
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
All today's birthdays', congrats!
GODSFUSION (37)
Zajcek (37)
ElectroDog (33)
sportcoupe (56)


Next birthdays
04/30 BlakFyre (36)
04/30 SENTRY (31)
05/01 Shaun (34)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: Tesla Coils
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

Medium size DRSSTC - Primary Flat or Helical

 1 2 3 
Move Thread LAN_403
Steve Conner
Sat Jun 09 2012, 06:47AM
Steve Conner Registered Member #30 Joined: Fri Feb 03 2006, 10:52AM
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
Posts: 6706
I don't think it would make a huge difference. Coupling is coupling. The flat primary is maybe slightly better, but I'm not sure if the improvement is worth the hassle of rebuilding it, compared to just raising the secondary.

The last coil I made had a 45 degree conical primary, which is kind of a compromise.

Also, NACOLIAKNSSTC (Nowadays Any Combination Of Letters Is A Kewl New SSTC)
Back to top
Killa-X
Sat Jun 09 2012, 11:53PM
Killa-X Registered Member #1643 Joined: Mon Aug 18 2008, 06:10PM
Location:
Posts: 1039
Sounds good, raising will def. be better than lowering. Right now the first turn on my primary matches the first turn on my secondary, roughly 1" off the ground. I have 8 turns to find my resonance, so, reality it climbs about 5 inches up my secondary. 24awg wire, so you can do the math to estimate how many turns.
Back to top
brandon3055
Sun Jun 10 2012, 01:38AM
brandon3055 Registered Member #4548 Joined: Mon Apr 23 2012, 03:52AM
Location: tasmania
Posts: 271
When people refur to the tank cap in an DR do they mean the large input filter cap (as I have always thought) or do they mean the cap in seirise with the primary
Back to top
Sigurthr
Sun Jun 10 2012, 12:41PM
Sigurthr Registered Member #4463 Joined: Wed Apr 18 2012, 08:08AM
Location: MI's Upper Peninsula
Posts: 597
They mean the cap in series with the primary as this forms the "tank" circuit. It does cause confusion for non native english speakers or people new to electronics from time to time. Filter caps are also called "energy storage" caps. What does a tank of fuel do? Store liquid energy, so don't feel bad about the confusion.
Back to top
brandon3055
Sun Jun 10 2012, 01:18PM
brandon3055 Registered Member #4548 Joined: Mon Apr 23 2012, 03:52AM
Location: tasmania
Posts: 271
Aah now it all makes sense the reason I was confused is because most Sstc's also have a series cap on the primary but don't often have a large fillter cap so then I guess the difference between an Sstc and a Dr is just that in a Dr the tank circuit is tuned to the same frez as the primary
Back to top
Sigurthr
Sun Jun 10 2012, 02:57PM
Sigurthr Registered Member #4463 Joined: Wed Apr 18 2012, 08:08AM
Location: MI's Upper Peninsula
Posts: 597
A SSTC doesn't need any capacitor in the primary circuit... you're "hard" driving the pulses going in to the primary at the frequency the secondary is resonant to, a kind of forced systemic resonance (the primary is never in resonance at all).

A DRSSTC is a SSTC where you add capacitance to the Primary so that it forms its own LC circuit which you set the resonance point to be the same (or close to, in reality) as the secondary's self-resonance frequency. The DR in DRSSTC means "dual (or double) Resonant" since there are now two resonant circuits; 1) the primary + tank cap, and 2) the Secondary.

In an ideal theoretical (not real world!) Tesla Coil you would choose components so that one resonant circuit feeds another, which then feeds another. With a simple SGTC this would be descibed as where the first circuit is the input transformer and the primary capacitor, the next would be the tank capacitor and the primary, and then it is coupled to the secondary, which is its own resonant circuit. Everything would be operating at the same frequency. This of course doesn't work in real life as resonant rise would destroy real world components. The DRSSTC is just a "chip off the block" so to speak in that it strives to achieve resonance in every viable subsystem of the device.
Back to top
Killa-X
Sun Jun 10 2012, 08:15PM
Killa-X Registered Member #1643 Joined: Mon Aug 18 2008, 06:10PM
Location:
Posts: 1039
Actually, All of my SSTC's (full bridges) feature a 1.36uF in series with the primary...

Link2
Back to top
Steve Conner
Sun Jun 10 2012, 09:53PM
Steve Conner Registered Member #30 Joined: Fri Feb 03 2006, 10:52AM
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
Posts: 6706
The story goes that in the first radio transmitters, around the turn of the 20th century, the tuning capacitor consisted of a stack of metal plates immersed in a tank of oil. Hence the name tank capacitor, and tank circuit for the LC resonant circuit.

Later on, Tesla coil builders borrowed the term from radio hams.
Back to top
brandon3055
Sun Jun 10 2012, 11:52PM
brandon3055 Registered Member #4548 Joined: Mon Apr 23 2012, 03:52AM
Location: tasmania
Posts: 271
Killa-X wrote ...

Actually, All of my SSTC's (full bridges) feature a 1.36uF in series with the primary...

Link2

So do just about every Sstc h bridge circuit I have ever found including mine so I guess most of the Sstc's out there are actually DRSSTC's that gust need a tune up (it think they use it as current limiting)
Back to top
Sigurthr
Mon Jun 11 2012, 01:22AM
Sigurthr Registered Member #4463 Joined: Wed Apr 18 2012, 08:08AM
Location: MI's Upper Peninsula
Posts: 597
I am far from an expert or pioneer who coined the terms but it seems to me that it is not the case that a SSTC cannot have a capacitor in the primary circuit, just that the primary circuit is by definition NOT RESONANT. As soon as the primary circuit enters resonance with the secondary it becomes a DRSSTC.

So it seems it would be more correct to say a SSTC doesn't need a primary circuit capacitor but a DRSSTC does and it must be selected for resonance.

Though if you're going to put a capacitor in the primary circuit why not go all the way and make it a DRSSTC? I suppose you would need to implement a controller/interupter since DRSSTCs cannot run CW mode, but they're not that hard to do, a simple PWM 555 into an enable pin is all it takes. It seems to me that a nonresonant tank capacitor is just going to hurt performance by creating parasitic oscillations at the primary LC's Fres, which depending on the feedback method used could get in to the drive circuitry and compete against the secondary's feedback.
Back to top
 1 2 3 

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.