If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.
Special Thanks To:
Aaron Holmes
Aaron Wheeler
Adam Horden
Alan Scrimgeour
Andre
Andrew Haynes
Anonymous000
asabase
Austin Weil
barney
Barry
Bert Hickman
Bill Kukowski
Blitzorn
Brandon Paradelas
Bruce Bowling
BubeeMike
Byong Park
Cesiumsponge
Chris F.
Chris Hooper
Corey Worthington
Derek Woodroffe
Dalus
Dan Strother
Daniel Davis
Daniel Uhrenholt
datasheetarchive
Dave Billington
Dave Marshall
David F.
Dennis Rogers
drelectrix
Dr. John Gudenas
Dr. Spark
E.TexasTesla
eastvoltresearch
Eirik Taylor
Erik Dyakov
Erlend^SE
Finn Hammer
Firebug24k
GalliumMan
Gary Peterson
George Slade
GhostNull
Gordon Mcknight
Graham Armitage
Grant
GreySoul
Henry H
IamSmooth
In memory of Leo Powning
Jacob Cash
James Howells
James Pawson
Jeff Greenfield
Jeff Thomas
Jesse Frost
Jim Mitchell
jlr134
Joe Mastroianni
John Forcina
John Oberg
John Willcutt
Jon Newcomb
klugesmith
Leslie Wright
Lutz Hoffman
Mads Barnkob
Martin King
Mats Karlsson
Matt Gibson
Matthew Guidry
mbd
Michael D'Angelo
Mikkel
mileswaldron
mister_rf
Neil Foster
Nick de Smith
Nick Soroka
nicklenorp
Nik
Norman Stanley
Patrick Coleman
Paul Brodie
Paul Jordan
Paul Montgomery
Ped
Peter Krogen
Peter Terren
PhilGood
Richard Feldman
Robert Bush
Royce Bailey
Scott Fusare
Scott Newman
smiffy
Stella
Steven Busic
Steve Conner
Steve Jones
Steve Ward
Sulaiman
Thomas Coyle
Thomas A. Wallace
Thomas W
Timo
Torch
Ulf Jonsson
vasil
Vaxian
vladi mazzilli
wastehl
Weston
William Kim
William N.
William Stehl
Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Registered Member #190
Joined: Fri Feb 17 2006, 12:00AM
Location:
Posts: 1567
Does this mean that at the center of every black hole, including the supermassive black holes thought to be at the center of galaxies, is a singularity?
Registered Member #158
Joined: Sun Feb 12 2006, 09:53PM
Location: Central Ohio
Posts: 282
Firkragg wrote ...
Black hole occupies no space, and is infinitely dense.
The thing we see as a big black scary thing is generally it's horizon.
A mini black hole out of 2 protons or one in center of galaxy have no physical differences except size. (and you can divide them by size if you wish).
So than a black hole cannot exist without there being a singularity? Said another way, is it then impossible for there to be a 'stable' mass of a certain value and size that has a stong enough magnetic pull to not allow light to escape? Or is it that any object regardless of size or mass that has a gravitational pull that can suck light in must be of infinite density and not occupy any space (other than the apparent space of the event horizon)? I was under the impression that there was another threshold that had to be reached for a black hole to become infinitely dense and form a singularity.
Registered Member #397
Joined: Wed Apr 19 2006, 12:56AM
Location: Western Washington
Posts: 125
I think black hole and singularity are used interchangably today By now, I am not sure it matters, but I recall "black hole" was a slang for singularities and describes the Schwarzschild radius of a singularity. Obviously it appears as a "black hole" in the backdrop.
A singularity can never be directly observed as it exists inside it's Schwarzschild radius but as mentioned, you can determine it's mass by measiring the Schwarzschild radius. Also the natural formation of such from dying stars are guided by the Chandrasekhar and Tolman-Oppenheimer-Volkoff limits based on a factor of solar masses.
In order to create a small singularity that fall well below those limits, you need to exceed neutron degeneracy which takes a LOT of energy.
Granted, scientists and physicists sometimes come up with clever ways to cheat and use backdoor methods to accomplish things without breaking the laws of physics so it might be possible. Occasionally you hear articles of teams proposing to create miniature black holes and other exotic research. I'm not sure if any of these have ever come into fruitation though.
Registered Member #139
Joined: Sat Feb 11 2006, 11:01AM
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Posts: 358
Firkragg wrote ...
Black hole occupies no space, and is infinitely dense.
No, that is not the case, one thing that we try to avoid in physics is infinities. A black hole still has mass, and it will still emit (hawking) radiation like a hot body, therefore, a black hole isn't truly black. It will also occupy volume in space.
Registered Member #32
Joined: Sat Feb 04 2006, 08:58AM
Location: Australia
Posts: 549
The event horizon of a black hole contains a volume and this is the usual definition of the size of the black hole. Saying that the hunk of matter inside occupies a finite volume is a different thing.
Theoretical physicists who shy away from the idea of infinite density have come up with alternative descriptions of black holes that do not involve singularities.
Registered Member #158
Joined: Sun Feb 12 2006, 09:53PM
Location: Central Ohio
Posts: 282
No, that is not the case, one thing that we try to avoid in physics is infinities. A black hole still has mass, and it will still emit (hawking) radiation like a hot body, therefore, a black hole isn't truly black. It will also occupy volume in space.
Don't the laws of physics not apply beyond the boundary of the event horizon of a singularity? In which case you wouldnt have to avoid the infinites because there are no laws that govern whats beyond the event horizon? And I thought by definition that a singularity is a single point in space (point, that means no dimension or volume)?
And I dont beleive anyone said they will not have mass, or infinite mass for that matter, although I could have missed that. They have infinite density because the mass they have takes up no space/volume.
Registered Member #65
Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 06:43AM
Location:
Posts: 1155
â€Don't the laws of physics not apply beyond the boundary of the event horizon of a singularityâ€
It’s a mystery – there are literally dozens of reasonable hypothesis. Some suggest manifolds in space-time that could not be considered classical mass by any means (infinite or otherwise.)
Most theories today however are not falsifiable by experiment – but a plausible explanation may be observable someday
Personally I think cartoon ACME Inc. holes are less controversial and more logical then some of the ideas.
Registered Member #72
Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 08:29AM
Location: UK St. Albans
Posts: 1659
Although both are hypothesised and neither has been proved conclusively to exist, black holes and singularities are very different things.
The theory behind black holes is very well supported. A black holes does not need a singularity inside to be black, only sufficient mass. There are places in the universe where a block hole would fit observations well. There are known simple mechanisms by which they could form.
There is no theory behind singularities beyond physicsits saying "so then when nuclear repulsion is overcome and Pauli exclusion is overcome, there's nothing to hold this stuff apart, and it all goes down to ... omg ... nothing". FWIW, I don't believe in singularities, I just don't think we know enough yet about what happens at the extremes of pressure and density (well it helps me sleep at night, other people believe crazier things!) Physicists are starting to come up with theories that avoid infinite density in a singluarity, partly 'cos it's interesting maths, and I suspect partly because they don't believe in infinite density either. Whether such will ever be testable is another matter.
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.