Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 24
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
All today's birthdays', congrats!
hvguy (41)
thehappyelectron (14)
Justin (2024)


Next birthdays
05/15 Linas (34)
05/15 Toasty (29)
05/16 kg7bz (68)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: Projects
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

uRADMonitor – Online remote radiation monitoring station

Move Thread LAN_403
radhoo
Sun Feb 03 2013, 11:28PM
radhoo Registered Member #1938 Joined: Sun Jan 25 2009, 12:44PM
Location: Romania
Posts: 699
Stella, no need to worry about that, all it needs is a power supply and a network connector plugged in, and it does the job by itself. Just let me know if you have a router, with a permanent internet connection.

Conundrum, which tubes? SBM-19's or the SI-39's? For both there's just one answer: ex communist block :)
Back to top
radhoo
Fri Feb 08 2013, 10:23AM
radhoo Registered Member #1938 Joined: Sun Jan 25 2009, 12:44PM
Location: Romania
Posts: 699
The second anomaly, for a total of 8 minutes, and now radiation levels are slightly higher:

1360318848 1938 FT111231 Atypical Radiation Cpm 13 02 08


Highest CPM reading was 5175, considering an average of 81cpm .

Similar to last time, no indication of system malfunction: everything is in scale, and running continuously, except radiation data. Debug data posted here: Link2

Probably it is time to add a backup/redundant detector to the system.
Back to top
Proud Mary
Fri Feb 08 2013, 12:09PM
Proud Mary Registered Member #543 Joined: Tue Feb 20 2007, 04:26PM
Location: UK
Posts: 4992
This first circuit is a GM coincidence detector I found on a cosmic ray site a few years ago. I haven't tried it, but I think you'll agree that the cathode resistors look too high at 1:100 against the anode resistor. But at least they have taken the signal off the cathode, so it can't be all bad. smile

1360324286 543 FT0 Conicidence Counter Schematic



This here is a commercial anti-coincidence detector I found in a geophysics database of radiation tools.

Coincidence Jpg

Used together in a simple array of four GM tubes, these two circuits - or variations or improvements of them - would be powerful tools to identify your anomaly.
Back to top
radhoo
Fri Feb 08 2013, 12:25PM
radhoo Registered Member #1938 Joined: Sun Jan 25 2009, 12:44PM
Location: Romania
Posts: 699
Yes, I will probably have to add that eventually, but I am also considering connecting a scintillation probe to the monitor.

While I do that, here is some more data. I have attached the maximum resolution charts, built with the data I have. What's interesting is that temperature has increased during the event with 0.5 degrees. Keep in mind that the peak happened during a cold winter night, with no sources for additional heat: except perhaps a little extra radiation, passing a bit of its energy to the air, as heat? All three temperature sensors running in parallel have recorded an increase:



1360326291 1938 FT111231 Cpm

1360326291 1938 FT111231 Temp1
Back to top
radhoo
Fri Feb 08 2013, 12:26PM
radhoo Registered Member #1938 Joined: Sun Jan 25 2009, 12:44PM
Location: Romania
Posts: 699
And here is the peak from January, 31:

1360326368 1938 FT111231 Cpm


Same shape. Same length.
Back to top
Proud Mary
Fri Feb 08 2013, 12:43PM
Proud Mary Registered Member #543 Joined: Tue Feb 20 2007, 04:26PM
Location: UK
Posts: 4992
I believe the rate of release of Rn from rocks, and its rise and fall as an Rn layer can be weather-related. I have no personal experience of this, but can't see how it could produce such a large and distinct effect.


If the tube voltage is set too high, right at the top end of the plateau slope, then even a very small increase of Va would trigger a storm of false counts.
Perhaps you could try pulling the anode voltage right down to the threshold level, so the tube will still be operating on the plateau if there is a sudden increase of anode voltage (providing it is not too large).


Back to top
radhoo
Fri Feb 08 2013, 12:57PM
radhoo Registered Member #1938 Joined: Sun Jan 25 2009, 12:44PM
Location: Romania
Posts: 699
This was my first thought, and I already checked that the first time it happened. The tube voltage is monitored constantly, so what this means is that each time I take a reading, that is every minute, I get the CPM, but also the voltage on tube for that minute.

In both cases, the tube voltage has been in normal parameters (that is +-5V + 400V). The microcontroller unit carefully regulates the voltage on the tube. Here are the tube voltage measurements:
January 31:
Link2
The log shows: 402 / 401 / 400 / 399 V values during the abnormal radiation event

February 8:
Link2
The log shows: 400 / 399 V values during the abnormal radiation event

Also the duty cycle of the 400V inverter PWM is monitored. Also in normal parameters. And the voltage and duty cycle has been kept constant all the way since this monitor first became operational.
Back to top
Proud Mary
Fri Feb 08 2013, 04:05PM
Proud Mary Registered Member #543 Joined: Tue Feb 20 2007, 04:26PM
Location: UK
Posts: 4992
We see in the SBM-19 datasheet that the threshold is in the range 260V - 320V, and operating range is between 350V and 475V.

I suggest thoroughly cleaning the anode insulator with alcohol etc, baking it in a cool oven to boil off the solvent, and then painting it with dielectric varnish.

When this is done, re-set the power supply to 350V. This will give you the whole length of the plateau before random avalanches kick off in the tube, and also reduce the possibility of false triggering by micro surface discharges by reducing the voltage.

You must eliminate every possible error before deciding to accept this anomalous reading as true.









Back to top
radhoo
Wed Feb 13 2013, 06:47PM
radhoo Registered Member #1938 Joined: Sun Jan 25 2009, 12:44PM
Location: Romania
Posts: 699
I cannot do that. Dropping the voltage would also decrease the number of registered pulses.

I just tried it with 350V, and the immediate change was a drop from an average of 80 cpm to about 65cpm. Since I already accumulated a few months of readings, changing the voltage at this point would break the data into two , incomparable sets.

Back to top
Proud Mary
Wed Feb 13 2013, 07:40PM
Proud Mary Registered Member #543 Joined: Tue Feb 20 2007, 04:26PM
Location: UK
Posts: 4992
Is the rate of increase along the plateau greater than 10% per hundred volts, which would suggest a bad tube?
Back to top

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.