Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 27
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
All today's birthdays', congrats!
Linas (34)
Toasty (29)


Next birthdays
05/15 Linas (34)
05/15 Toasty (29)
05/16 kg7bz (68)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: General Chatting
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

The ideas thread

Move Thread LAN_403
Conundrum
Sat Oct 18 2014, 03:40PM
Conundrum Registered Member #96 Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 05:37PM
Location: CI, Earth
Posts: 4059
Sounds cool..

I had some fusion ideas, emailed Coherent Scientific and they are interested if I can build a prototype and test it.

EDIT: Also had some ideas about making BiNT (Bismuth nanotubes) using Mg3Bi in a microwave filled with argon and water vapour then mix with UV setting resin and apply UV and HV axially to form the links.
Combined with a pick and place machine this might work out cheaper than silver with a minimal loss of conductivity and possibly even a gain.
Back to top
hboy007
Thu Mar 26 2015, 10:31PM
hboy007 Registered Member #1667 Joined: Sat Aug 30 2008, 09:57PM
Location:
Posts: 373
NASA proposes to change the trajectory of an asteroid - Link2
but with gravitational interaction between the object and a space probe that rides parallel to it over a long time. Opportunity, once planned as a 3 month mission is still going, still it feels like a little bit too much effort for the minute interaction that will be established.

Let's assume that the object is icy, we can achieve a not-so-philae-esque landing and collect samples. Add a radioisotope heat source and all the pre-requisites are in place to generate jets from steam / methane / etc. over the course of a few years. Yes, this would be quite a challenge because all the components must function properly for the whole process to continue but we're talking about Newtons of thrust.
(a quick calculation suggests 67p could be moved this way by 4 meters over the course of 3 years.. oh boy).
Need more power? Just wrap the whole darn thing in plastic, let the sun do the melting and create a single directed jet of gasses. Nah, let's not go there smile
Back to top
Patrick
Thu Mar 26 2015, 11:26PM
Patrick Registered Member #2431 Joined: Tue Oct 13 2009, 09:47PM
Location: Chico, CA. USA
Posts: 5639
NASA needs to justify money expended...
Back to top
Conundrum
Tue Mar 31 2015, 06:35AM
Conundrum Registered Member #96 Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 05:37PM
Location: CI, Earth
Posts: 4059
What if.. a memory chip can quantum cohere at room temperature if you feed it the right combination of clock and data to form standing waves in the nanometre sized pathways?
Back to top
Teodor Zafiroski
Tue Mar 31 2015, 02:56PM
Teodor Zafiroski Registered Member #48007 Joined: Wed Jun 18 2014, 01:00PM
Location: Prilep, Republic of Macedonia
Posts: 33
What if, you used a microcontroller and a speaker to make a variable distance spark gap, the width of the gap dictates the frequency at which the gap will fire, changing the distance between the electrodes will change the BPS. If we program the microcontroller to change the distance between electrodes with change of input signal frequency, that could audio modulate an SGTC... That would be limited to around several hundred hertz, but, we'd be able to modulate a SGTC... A wild idea that I had for years but never had the time or money to try...
Back to top
hboy007
Sun Jul 19 2015, 08:33PM
hboy007 Registered Member #1667 Joined: Sat Aug 30 2008, 09:57PM
Location:
Posts: 373
Sorry, it's me again:

re Link2

if we can have coordinated drone maneuvers / swarm control and self-organisation, why don't we develop "flying fire hoses" with drones that attach to the hose and are powered by a high voltage backbone + DC/DC for each drone?

Wouldn't that be a natural conclusion? People could even donate the equivalent of a drone for the system and then see where "their" drone is an active helper for the fire fighters. Plus no pilots in the air have to fly dangerous maneuvers.
Back to top
hen918
Sun Jul 19 2015, 08:57PM
hen918 Registered Member #11591 Joined: Wed Mar 20 2013, 08:20PM
Location: UK
Posts: 556
hboy007 wrote ...

Sorry, it's me again:

re Link2

if we can have coordinated drone maneuvers / swarm control and self-organisation, why don't we develop "flying fire hoses" with drones that attach to the hose and are powered by a high voltage backbone + DC/DC for each drone?

Wouldn't that be a natural conclusion? People could even donate the equivalent of a drone for the system and then see where "their" drone is an active helper for the fire fighters. Plus no pilots in the air have to fly dangerous maneuvers.

These drones would have to be massive (and cost lots of money) to lift a fire hose. Do you know how much those things kick?
Back to top
Dr. Slack
Sun Jul 19 2015, 09:12PM
Dr. Slack Registered Member #72 Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 08:29AM
Location: UK St. Albans
Posts: 1659
As we know how much fire hoses kick, and have seen people carried aloft by them as a sport Link2 , it appears that having a drone thingy to lift it is not necessary, just have the hose lift itself. The water will not go on the fire until it has manourvered to the correct position, and that position may involve getting the hose across the fire, so it may restrict the launch position.
Back to top
hboy007
Sun Jul 19 2015, 09:13PM
hboy007 Registered Member #1667 Joined: Sat Aug 30 2008, 09:57PM
Location:
Posts: 373
people get 2-5kg lift capacity with hexacopters and you'd only need a small battery pack which would be sufficient for a 2" hose filled with water if you'd put one drone per meter. The question that remains is: what is cheaper: 200m of drone hose or one helicopter? The break-even should be somewhere in the region of 100-500m? It's been a while since I last bought helicopters, I might not be up to date wink
If we're still in at that price point: what is a feasible action radius in that sort of terrain and how could one work around the arising limitations?

@Dr. Slack: right, I had not considered the "boundary condition" of the hose. With a stiffer end segment or wrapping made of electro-stiffening polymer Link2 we might be up to something. Suitably distributed water thrusters along the hose might also help - however I still think you'd need drones for the maneuverability so the hose can enter the scene from above.

The fire engine power on the ground is a different story altogether. Maybe someone can fill me in.
Back to top
Ash Small
Mon Jul 20 2015, 12:53PM
Ash Small Registered Member #3414 Joined: Sun Nov 14 2010, 05:05PM
Location: UK
Posts: 4245
Wouldn't 'wheeled drone fire trucks' be a simpler, more effective solution?

Maybe the three water cannon purchased by Boris Johnson to use against the people of London would be better used by converting them to RC, and using them to fight fires?

You could use drones for reconnisance and for directing the jets of water.
Back to top

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.