Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 12
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
One birthday today, congrats!
a.gutzeit (63)


Next birthdays
05/07 a.gutzeit (63)
05/08 wpk5008 (34)
05/09 Alfons (36)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: Electromagnetic Radiation
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

X-Ray VS Magnetron?

1 2 3 4 
Move Thread LAN_403
Dragon64
Sat Apr 12 2008, 01:21PM Print
Dragon64 Registered Member #1438 Joined: Sat Apr 12 2008, 12:57AM
Location: Canada
Posts: 218
I was browsing some website when I saw a big title saying "Make An X-Ray Machine With A Magnetron!"

Is this possible with the correct voltage? Or is this guy talking nonesense?
Back to top
lpfthings
Sat Apr 12 2008, 01:25PM
lpfthings Registered Member #1361 Joined: Thu Feb 28 2008, 10:57AM
Location: Cairns, Australia
Posts: 305
Deffinately nonsense, magnetrons emit radiation in the 2.4ghz feild, not even close to x-ray frequency.
Back to top
Proud Mary
Sat Apr 12 2008, 02:10PM
Proud Mary Registered Member #543 Joined: Tue Feb 20 2007, 04:26PM
Location: UK
Posts: 4992
Not definitely nonsense at all. It may possibly work if you remove the magnet, don't apply heater current, and apply a sufficiently high voltage.

Many types of thermionic valves [USA: "tubes"] can be driven to produce X-rays by cold cathode discharge by running them at a suitably high voltage without applying heater/filament current.

Popular valves used by amateur X-radiographers are PD500 [in Europe] and the 6BK4B [in the United States,] which are similar EHT shunt stabiliser triodes used in valve-era colour television sets.

Many television EHT rectifier diode valves can also be made to give enough X-radiation for amateur experiments.

A magnetron - which has already been designed to hold off quite large voltages - could very likely emit X-rays if you discard the magnet, do not apply heater current, and stick 40kV and more across it in a suitably safe way.

Make sure you have a reliable means of detecting and measuring any X-rays produced, and be very careful indeed with all that you do.

Back to top
Dr. Mario
Thu Sept 30 2010, 11:45PM
Dr. Mario Registered Member #3059 Joined: Tue Aug 03 2010, 04:09AM
Location: My turf
Posts: 18
You will have to apply the heater current, since Magnetron was pumped to the same Torrs as X-ray tube, it's so that way the microwave don't get attunated when being resonated among capacitor ring inside it. So you will have to apply the power to heater, then Presto, a powerful X-ray tube! When I say "Powerful", you would get away with 200mA of 50kV - but be especially warned when you hack that magnetron tube: That stuff will emit especially nasty hard X-ray (0.8 - 0.01nm - depending on how much you're willing to punish your inverter...). Mucho power can be obtained with Marx - up to 5 Megawatts pulses. You would definitely don't want to stand in the front of your newly-bapisited X-ray tube, a very bad idea...
Back to top
Adam Munich
Fri Oct 01 2010, 12:38AM
Adam Munich Registered Member #2893 Joined: Tue Jun 01 2010, 09:25PM
Location: Cali-forn. i. a.
Posts: 2242
The only possible use I see for this is a death ray. If you apply 75kV at 200mA you'll get a ridiculous amount of radiation, but it will be unfocused and moving in all directions. Thus it'll be unsuitable for taking any pictures.
Back to top
Proud Mary
Fri Oct 01 2010, 07:59AM
Proud Mary Registered Member #543 Joined: Tue Feb 20 2007, 04:26PM
Location: UK
Posts: 4992
Dr. Mario wrote ...

You will have to apply the heater current, since Magnetron was pumped to the same Torrs as X-ray tube, it's so that way the microwave don't get attunated when being resonated among capacitor ring inside it. So you will have to apply the power to heater, then Presto, a powerful X-ray tube! When I say "Powerful", you would get away with 200mA of 50kV - but be especially warned when you hack that magnetron tube: That stuff will emit especially nasty hard X-ray (0.8 - 0.01nm - depending on how much you're willing to punish your inverter...). Mucho power can be obtained with Marx - up to 5 Megawatts pulses. You would definitely don't want to stand in the front of your newly-bapisited X-ray tube, a very bad idea...

If you connect a 50kV 200mA supply to a heated oven magnetron, the magnetron will be destroyed immediately.

However, if the magnetron is left unheated, then some X-rays will be produced by field emission electrons impacting the anode if a sufficiently high voltage is applied. As soon as heater current is applied, the voltage drop across the valve will fall to a low value insufficient for significant X-ray production to occur.

The more thoughtful and discerning reader will remember that some old TV EHT valves only became X-ray hazards when their heaters had failed, so the voltage drop between anode and cathode rose to the full EHT supply voltage and field emission occurred.




Back to top
cedric
Fri Oct 01 2010, 10:32AM
cedric Registered Member #2941 Joined: Fri Jun 25 2010, 08:08AM
Location:
Posts: 143
hydraliskdragon wrote ...

I was browsing some website when I saw a big title saying "Make An X-Ray Machine With A Magnetron!"

Is this possible with the correct voltage? Or is this guy talking nonesense?



I did it ,once .
removing the magnet from the tube,for the power supply I use a microwave oven transformer ,his capacitor and a spark gap dumping the capacitor in to a double plastic boxed car ignition coil . it give about 140 kv output in 100 hz,with a lot of current. the spark gap was set at one millimeter,
next ,I plug the anode in the transformer along with one of the side of the ignition coil and and the cathode on the other side of the coil.a lot of tape to give some sort of dielectric isolation
first time I tested ,my geiger counter want crazy ,even at 3 meter from the set up,first I was thinking it was du to the electric field who might have influence the counter, but than I tested with a fosfor screen and I sow the light ,it escape from the ceramic side ,the copper cathode is way to thick to let much out ,I think that this day I get my ten year radiation dose all at one,not very smart ,any way in this set up the system could not work more than few second at a time or the tube would get destroy ,and after some time the ignition coil left this world in a flaming and smoking agonies.
a magnetron with out magnet is just a high power vacuum diode,so there is no problem getting radiation out ,now for practical purpose ,an x-ray tube is much more efficient and a lot less dangerous (at list you know where most of the radiation are going..)
Back to top
Proud Mary
Fri Oct 01 2010, 12:02PM
Proud Mary Registered Member #543 Joined: Tue Feb 20 2007, 04:26PM
Location: UK
Posts: 4992
Dr. Mario wrote ...

When I say "Powerful", you would get away with 200mA of 50kV - but be especially warned when you hack that magnetron tube: That stuff will emit especially nasty hard X-ray (0.8 - 0.01nm - depending on how much you're willing to punish your inverter...).

X-rays of wavelength 0.01nm have an energy of 124.125keV, so this wavelength could never be produced by a 50kV supply, no matter what sort of X-ray generator was used.

The shortest X-ray wavelength possible with a 50kV supply is 0.024825nm.

Moreover, X-rays of wavelength 0.8nm have an energy of 1.55keV, and rather than being "especially nasty hard X-rays" are so extremely soft that they would be unable to leave the magnetron shell, and even if we were to imagine that they could, then specialised instruments would be needed to detect them,.

Are you reporting nonsense you have seen elsewhere, or just making it up as you go along?


Back to top
Steve Conner
Fri Oct 01 2010, 01:02PM
Steve Conner Registered Member #30 Joined: Fri Feb 03 2006, 10:52AM
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
Posts: 6706
cedric wrote ...

but than I tested with a fosfor screen and I sow the light ,it escape from the ceramic side
Did you do this with the filament on or off?
Back to top
cedric
Fri Oct 01 2010, 01:45PM
cedric Registered Member #2941 Joined: Fri Jun 25 2010, 08:08AM
Location:
Posts: 143
Steve McConner wrote ...

cedric wrote ...

but than I tested with a fosfor screen and I sow the light ,it escape from the ceramic side
Did you do this with the filament on or off?

on ,the filament was plug on the small secondary of the MOT.
Back to top
1 2 3 4 

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.