Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 19
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
No birthdays today

Next birthdays
05/04 Matthew T. (35)
05/04 Amrit Deshmukh (60)
05/05 Alexandre (32)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: High Voltage
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

Half-Bridge Flyback Driver: MOSFETs vs. IGBTs

1 2 
Move Thread LAN_403
Dr. Dark Current
Fri May 11 2007, 06:40PM Print
Dr. Dark Current Registered Member #152 Joined: Sun Feb 12 2006, 03:36PM
Location: Czech Rep.
Posts: 3384
Well, so the question is: For high power (>300W) off-line half-bridge driver, which are more suited? MOSFETs or IGBTs? Has anyone tried IGBTs in half-bridge to drive flybacks at high power?
So far I have run half-bridge drivers only with FETs, mainly IRF740 (400V, 10A, 550mOhm). The problem is, they heat noticably @300W, even when conduction losses should be no more than 2W. Do you think, will there be a big improvement using IGBTs (such as the IRG4PC40W, which I can get for the same price as IRFP460)? My goal is to go over 500W to drive two similar flybacks in parallel.
Any help on this is appreciated!
Back to top
uzzors2k
Fri May 11 2007, 07:15PM
uzzors2k Registered Member #95 Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 04:57PM
Location: Norway
Posts: 1308
I always use mosfets. I think IGBTs are better suited for low frequency/ high current applications, given their massive gate capacitance. 500W from rectified 230V mains is only 1.5A, so an IRF740 will do. Also driving mosfets is a piece of cake, so I would use a mosfet. If you decide to use IGBTs then remember the extra gate drive requirements, I seem to remember people talking about 30nF gate capacitances!

About the heating, are you sure the flyback core is not saturating? I was running 2 paralleled IRFP450s in my offline half-bridge driver, and they were still getting hot after short runs. (10 seconds angry ) I solved the problem by increasing the frequency to the point where the core no longer saturated, and suddenly I could use a single IRFP450 and run the driver at full power for as long as I wanted to! So make sure the core is not saturating! Be sure that the flyback cores can take 500W.
Back to top
Wolfram
Fri May 11 2007, 07:46PM
Wolfram Registered Member #33 Joined: Sat Feb 04 2006, 01:31PM
Location: Norway
Posts: 971
IGBTs usually don't have too high gate capacitances. The last ones I worked with, IRG4BC20UDs, are around 500pF IIRC. 30nF was propably some big brick IGBT.

Driving IGBTs is quite a bit like driving MOSFETs.

The main difference is on the switching side. IGBTs are not as fast as MOSFETs, because their operation is based on minority carriers, which are, inherently, slow. This means slower switching and larger switching losses. When it comes to conduction losses, IGBTs are better for high current, as the conduction losses in an IGBT are propotional to the current. The conduction losses in MOSFETs go up with the square of the current.


Anders M.
Back to top
Steve Ward
Fri May 11 2007, 07:56PM
Steve Ward Registered Member #146 Joined: Sun Feb 12 2006, 04:21AM
Location: Austin Tx
Posts: 1055
Mosfets, and really purely for economical reasons. You can surely find an IGBT that is small, and fast, but it will likely cost more than a well suited MOSFET.
Back to top
Dr. Dark Current
Fri May 11 2007, 08:19PM
Dr. Dark Current Registered Member #152 Joined: Sun Feb 12 2006, 03:36PM
Location: Czech Rep.
Posts: 3384
Thanks for all replies!
Uzzors wrote ...

About the heating, are you sure the flyback core is not saturating? ... I solved the problem by increasing the frequency to the point where the core no longer saturated, and suddenly I could use a single IRFP450 and run the driver at full power for as long as I wanted to! So make sure the core is not saturating! Be sure that the flyback cores can take 500W.
I tried to increase the frequency, but this results in decreased output power, so I have to remove some turns to get to the same power level again... The fets were a bit colder, but I think increasing the frequency too much will result in too high switching losses (though I can and will try to do that wink )
The 500W figure was meant for 2 parallel flybacks.

As to the IGBT speed problem, I think with modern fast IGBT it's no longer a big problem (in the datasheet of my selected IGBT, they state it is suited up to 150kHz (hard-switching), and this is when switching tens of amps. In my driver they will see only a fraction of that).
I think I'll buy the IGBTs (they're not all that expensive) and tell you how they do in my driver. smile
Back to top
Dr. Dark Current
Sun May 13 2007, 07:17AM
Dr. Dark Current Registered Member #152 Joined: Sun Feb 12 2006, 03:36PM
Location: Czech Rep.
Posts: 3384
I think I got to the trick. Previously I always set the running frequency just above resonant frequency, because this way I was getting higher voltages, and I thought also longer arcs. Of course not! When I set the running frequency right between two resonant frequencies, surprisingly I got longer arcs and cooler fets! shades
Back to top
Tonic
Sun May 13 2007, 09:39AM
Tonic Registered Member #528 Joined: Fri Feb 16 2007, 10:32PM
Location: Warsaw, Poland
Posts: 166
jmartis wrote ...

I think I got to the trick. Previously I always set the running frequency just above resonant frequency, because this way I was getting higher voltages, and I thought also longer arcs. Of course not! When I set the running frequency right between two resonant frequencies, surprisingly I got longer arcs and cooler fets! shades

Two resonant frequencies? I thought there's only one, how it is?
Back to top
Dr. Dark Current
Sun May 13 2007, 11:32AM
Dr. Dark Current Registered Member #152 Joined: Sun Feb 12 2006, 03:36PM
Location: Czech Rep.
Posts: 3384
Tonic wrote ...

jmartis wrote ...

I think I got to the trick. Previously I always set the running frequency just above resonant frequency, because this way I was getting higher voltages, and I thought also longer arcs. Of course not! When I set the running frequency right between two resonant frequencies, surprisingly I got longer arcs and cooler fets! shades

Two resonant frequencies? I thought there's only one, how it is?
ok maybe I was not clear on that, I meant harmonics of the fundamental resonant frequency
Back to top
gentoo_daemon
Sun May 13 2007, 04:39PM
gentoo_daemon Registered Member #512 Joined: Sat Feb 10 2007, 05:42PM
Location: Chico, CA
Posts: 25
mosfets vs igbts

Link2

it includes a nice power dissipation comparison between the two.
Back to top
Dr. Dark Current
Wed May 16 2007, 06:57PM
Dr. Dark Current Registered Member #152 Joined: Sun Feb 12 2006, 03:36PM
Location: Czech Rep.
Posts: 3384
Just out of curiosity I tried replacing one FET in my half bridge by a small IGBT (IRG4BC20U) I found in my junk drawer, and it heats about the same as the FET. So I think FETs and IGBTs are quite "on par" in this type of circuit.
Back to top
1 2 

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.