Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 25
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
All today's birthdays', congrats!
Matthew T. (35)
Amrit Deshmukh (60)


Next birthdays
05/05 Alexandre (32)
05/07 a.gutzeit (63)
05/08 wpk5008 (34)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: Tesla Coils
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

Coil decision

1 2 3 4 
Move Thread LAN_403
Michael W.
Thu Mar 22 2007, 07:40PM Print
Michael W. Registered Member #50 Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 04:07AM
Location: Vernon, B.C, Canada
Posts: 324
So, Dilemma. I have a 4.5" X 22.5" Coil and a 3" X 18" coil all varnished up and ready to use. I'm planning on using one of these with a 900W NST and an MMC, the question is if I choose the larger coil, will that give me larger arcs or am I better to stick with the smaller coil? and on a side note I already made the primary to suit the 3" coil but theres a lot of extra turns, will the tuning position change a lot outwards if I use the 4" coil or should I be good? Its alot of questions but I'm itching to get building.... cheesey
Back to top
Part Scavenger
Thu Mar 22 2007, 08:23PM
Part Scavenger Registered Member #79 Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 11:35AM
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 673
You'll probably get the same length with both secondaries depending on the constuction, # of turns, etc. The sparks will look bigger on the smaller one. The last question, I'm not sure about with the information you gave us, plug your numbers into TeslaCAD or something. That should tell you.
Back to top
Marko
Thu Mar 22 2007, 08:33PM
Marko Registered Member #89 Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 02:40PM
Location: Zadar, Croatia
Posts: 3145
Hi Michael! smile

I think the smaller one is fine since your max expected spark length is just around 3 lengths
(54''). And sparks will looke better on a smaller coil.

What are resonant frequencies of these two?
Back to top
Michael W.
Thu Mar 22 2007, 08:53PM
Michael W. Registered Member #50 Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 04:07AM
Location: Vernon, B.C, Canada
Posts: 324
Hi Marko! cheesey Well the resonant frequency of the Larger coil is 254.63Khz and the other one is 495.16Khz. I did want to use a larger coil so it would balance out the larger base I made for the whole thing but if they're both going to produce the same arc length then I might as well use the smaller coil...
Back to top
Sulaiman
Thu Mar 22 2007, 09:15PM
Sulaiman Registered Member #162 Joined: Mon Feb 13 2006, 10:25AM
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 3140
Roughly speaking, the larger the TC the more efficient it is. (arc length) / (input power)
i.e. I would expect a larger arc with the larger coil.

It's not proportional though, so as noted above the smaller coil would appear more impressive.
Back to top
Marko
Thu Mar 22 2007, 09:18PM
Marko Registered Member #89 Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 02:40PM
Location: Zadar, Croatia
Posts: 3145
Most importantly, larger secondary with lower frequency will allow to use much bigger primary for same bang energy, reducing peak current and losses.

Frequency of the smaller one here looks a bit high, but I guess topload can fix it.
I think you'l be able to push him well enough to start flashing over anyway..
Back to top
sparky
Fri Mar 23 2007, 01:54AM
sparky Registered Member #530 Joined: Sat Feb 17 2007, 07:56AM
Location: Victoria BC, Canada
Posts: 178
~ they will perform nearly identically... its all about looks.
Back to top
Part Scavenger
Sat Mar 24 2007, 02:40AM
Part Scavenger Registered Member #79 Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 11:35AM
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 673
Firkragg wrote ...

Most importantly, larger secondary with lower frequency will allow to use much bigger primary for same bang energy, reducing peak current and losses.

Frequency of the smaller one here looks a bit high, but I guess topload can fix it.
I think you'l be able to push him well enough to start flashing over anyway..

What's wrong with high peak currents? That's what you want! The goal is to get the current as high as possible as quickly as possible without flashover or exploding something, and have the spark gap quench so that all that power is quickly delivered to the coil and then trapped. Lower inductance (therefore higher capacitance) should get you bigger sparks. BUT, like Marko said you will waste more in the primary with higher current, and more inductance will have better coupling. Trick is to find the middle, I generally don't worry about it that much, I usually just give my power supply the capacitance it can handle, then build the primary accordingly. About the topload, I think I'd put one on that drops the frequency about 1/2.

About the secondary, *technically* you should get longer sparks with it. Because it has a lower resonant frequency, it will probably be more efficient. I honestly don't know how much, but output will be comparable. Personally, I would go with the smaller coil, because even though you may gain an inch with the bigger one, it won't look bigger.
Back to top
Marko
Sat Mar 24 2007, 10:41AM
Marko Registered Member #89 Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 02:40PM
Location: Zadar, Croatia
Posts: 3145
What's wrong with high peak currents? That's what you want! The goal is to get the current as high as possible as quickly as possible without flashover or exploding something, and have the spark gap quench so that all that power is quickly delivered to the coil and then trapped. Lower inductance (therefore higher capacitance) should get you bigger sparks. BUT, like Marko said you will waste more in the primary with higher current, and more inductance will have better coupling. Trick is to find the middle, I generally don't worry about it that much, I usually just give my power supply the capacitance it can handle, then build the primary accordingly. About the topload, I think I'd put one on that drops the frequency about 1/2.


Well, Q factor of the primary alone, not counting the secondary, is 1/R sqrt(L/C), y?

Your surge impedance is sqrt(L/C), so your peak willl be proportional to ratio of your inductance and capacitance!

You could easily get humongous peak currents in your primary by charging a huge capacitor at low voltage and discharging into a single turn primary, wich intuitively doesn't look like a well designed tesla coil!
Massive primary current will not do anything except creating huge losses on spark gap and require us to increase coupling to transfer most energy to secondary before it's lost.
High coupling often leads to flashovers, and, more importantly, current will heterodyne much faster, making it very difficult to quench properly with a gap that is already torched with massive current.

So, you just want as big as possible surge impedance. Secondary itself seems to have little importance about losses.

It was all well explained on richie burnett's site
Link2

And some questions are answered here

Link2

Before I baffle everything with hardcore TC theory, just design your cap after your power supply and your primary after your secondary... don't be afraid to use larger topload and more primary turns.




Back to top
Part Scavenger
Sat Mar 24 2007, 09:40PM
Part Scavenger Registered Member #79 Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 11:35AM
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 673
Ok, that is a very good point. Sorry.
Back to top
1 2 3 4 

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.