Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 26
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
All today's birthdays', congrats!
Adam Munich (30)
Alfredo Texacca (60)


Next birthdays
05/02 Adam Munich (30)
05/02 Alfredo Texacca (60)
05/04 Matthew T. (35)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: Tesla Coils
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

Capsule-shaped electrodes for static gap?

Move Thread LAN_403
J. Aaron Holmes
Mon Jan 22 2007, 11:06PM Print
J. Aaron Holmes Registered Member #477 Joined: Tue Jun 20 2006, 11:51PM
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 546
Lots of people seem to build and like the RQ-style spark gaps, where multiple short sections of copper water pipe are placed inside a large PVC tube with optional air blast. While admittedly not RQ-style, the first gap I ever made was with parallel sections of 3/8" tungsten rod placed over an air blast. My observation was that, particularly when the air blast was running, the sparks would only jump at the very ends of the rods. Presumably there are a few factors working against such a gap:

1) The air pressure is going to be somewhat lower at the ends of the pipe sections than directly in between them.

2) The breakdown voltage is somewhat less at the ends of the tubes because they're sharp-edged.

Whilst searching for something unrelated today, I ran into Liberty Brass, a company that sells brass half-spheres and spheres:

Link2

The half-spheres, in particular, looked like just the thing for solving this problem. I.e., you stick these on the ends of your gap pipes (or large-diameter solid brass rod, if you want to be really cool smile) and I would think that should solve the problems listed above.

Has anybody else observed this problem with RQ-ish gaps and air blasts? It really seems like the one of the principle downfalls of such gaps, since then the fouling and heating of the metal is concentrated in one place.

Tragically, I no longer have such a gap to play with, but it would make for a nice experiment...

Regards,
Aaron, N7OE
Back to top
...
Mon Jan 22 2007, 11:23PM
... Registered Member #56 Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 05:02AM
Location: Southern Califorina, USA
Posts: 2445
If the gaps are nice and parallel, mine are generally pretty regular.

So you want to use the spheres to make the ends of the segments round? Seems like a hammer/grinder (for hollow/solid) would do the job just fine, although if you need to add too much of a bend it might look sorta nasty...
Back to top
Alex
Tue Jan 23 2007, 12:37AM
Alex Geometrically Frustrated
Registered Member #6 Joined: Thu Feb 02 2006, 04:18AM
Location: Bowdoin, Maine
Posts: 373
That might not be a bad idea, but it seems that most people are doing fine without, so you might want to try some alternatives first. Make sure there are no burs on the end of your pipes, check that they are parallel (maybe put something flat in between adjacent tubes to test), and if that fails, try adding more gaps (and reduce gap size accordingly). The arcs should begin somewhere in the middle of the pipes and get blown out towards the end. If the gaps are getting too hot, it's possible that the arcs could be migrating to and staying at the end.
Back to top
J. Aaron Holmes
Tue Jan 23 2007, 03:25AM
J. Aaron Holmes Registered Member #477 Joined: Tue Jun 20 2006, 11:51PM
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 546
In my design, the blast was coming from behind the pipes, rather than from one end as in an RQ gap. That is why I said "RQ-ish". In an end-blown RQ gap, perhaps the air pressure is more regular, however it never seemed to me as though the classic "RQ" was an actively-quenched gap; rather, the air flow was small and mainly for cooling. In my case, I needed the arc to be blown out. An RQ didn't see too good for this, because as you say, the arc gets blown along the pipes.

I no longer have the gap fully built, but I do still have the tungsten rods, and they are clean and polished. No burs that I can see.

Increasing the number of gaps makes some sense; the stresses on the air will be less, and perhaps then the disparity between the air stresses in the middle and on the ends of the tubes will be insignificant. I don't know.

If I build a lower-powered or table-top coil again soon, I'll have to play with this some more. Ideally I'd find a machinist friend to just machine me some "copper lozenges" smile out of solid copper or brass or something. That would be "cool" shades

Regards,
Aaron, N7OE
Back to top

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.