Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 12
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
All today's birthdays', congrats!
ramses (16)
Arcstarter (31)
Zak (15)


Next birthdays
05/12 Colin 99 (53)
05/14 hvguy (41)
05/14 thehappyelectron (14)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: High Voltage
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

Which capacitor for quarter shrinker?

Move Thread LAN_403
MRMILSTAR
Sun Jul 22 2018, 07:29PM Print
MRMILSTAR Registered Member #62119 Joined: Sun Feb 04 2018, 04:59AM
Location: Cedar Rapids, Iowa
Posts: 136
I am in the process of designing a quarter shrinker. I have 2 energy discharge capacitors available for use. I am trying to decide which one to use. The specs are as follows:

Capacitor #1:

Maker: Aerovox
Capacitance: 100 uF
Maximum Voltage: 22 KV
Maximum voltage reversal: 20%
Maximum energy: 24 KJ

Capacitor #2:

Maker: Maxwell
Capacitance: 100 uF
Maximum Voltage: 10 KV
Maximum voltage reversal: 80%
Maximum energy available: 5 KJ

At first glance I would pick the Aerovox because of its maximum available energy of 24 KJ, even though I would probably never use all of that. However the Maxwell will tolerate an 80% voltage reversal whereas the Aerovox will only tolerate 20%. So for maximum life I could actually charge the Maxwell close to its maximum of 10 KV without violating its 80% voltage reversal spec. I could only charge the Aerovox to about 4.5 KV without violating its 20% voltage reversal spec. Thus, in this scenario, the Maxwell would deliver more energy without a lifespan reduction.

I am guessing that the Aerovox can probably take a lot more punishment than its 20% spec would indicate since I will only be firing this thing maybe a few hundred times over its life.

Does anyone that has built a quarter shrinker have any data suggesting the best choice?
Back to top
Ash Small
Mon Jul 23 2018, 05:14AM
Ash Small Registered Member #3414 Joined: Sun Nov 14 2010, 05:05PM
Location: UK
Posts: 4245
What does the maths say if you run them both in parallel at, maybe, 4.5kV?
Back to top
klugesmith
Mon Jul 23 2018, 06:30AM
klugesmith Registered Member #2099 Joined: Wed Apr 29 2009, 12:22AM
Location: Los Altos, California
Posts: 1714
Sounds like your voltage reversal estimates are too conservative.
If the charged voltage is X, the only way a voltage of -X can develop
is if the LCR circuit is lossless (R=0). Not only would that do no work, it would oscillate forever after you close the switch.

I'm going to guess that in low voltage tests, where the wire doesn't break and the quarter doesn't shrink, there's enough damping that the reversed voltage magnitude never exceeds X/2 or X/3. Try it with both of your capacitors, using an ordinary oscilloscope and an initial voltage on the order of 10 V or 100 V. How much does the observed reversal percentage change when you don't have a coin in the middle of the coil? It's a linear system, eh, so the levels will simply scale up with initial voltage, until the wire gets significantly hot or things physically move (resulting in more damping, not less).
When actually shrinking a coin, and splintering the work coil, the voltage might not reverse at all. What do the websites of Bert Hickman, or Hackaday, etc. , or Signification here say about the sign & magnitude of residual voltage after a shot?

Finally, based on what I remember from datasheets and online-accessible articles, those voltage reversal numbers (for device lifetime of N shots) are based on 100% charge. The increase in N for charge voltages less than 100% are dramatic, outweighing the extreme-reversal penalty. A 20% reversal spec would allow 80% reversal if the initial charge level were 25% of max. Don't take my word for it -- I put no money into your capacitor purchase -- but do some Internet searching.

Back to top

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.