If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.
Special Thanks To:
Aaron Holmes
Aaron Wheeler
Adam Horden
Alan Scrimgeour
Andre
Andrew Haynes
Anonymous000
asabase
Austin Weil
barney
Barry
Bert Hickman
Bill Kukowski
Blitzorn
Brandon Paradelas
Bruce Bowling
BubeeMike
Byong Park
Cesiumsponge
Chris F.
Chris Hooper
Corey Worthington
Derek Woodroffe
Dalus
Dan Strother
Daniel Davis
Daniel Uhrenholt
datasheetarchive
Dave Billington
Dave Marshall
David F.
Dennis Rogers
drelectrix
Dr. John Gudenas
Dr. Spark
E.TexasTesla
eastvoltresearch
Eirik Taylor
Erik Dyakov
Erlend^SE
Finn Hammer
Firebug24k
GalliumMan
Gary Peterson
George Slade
GhostNull
Gordon Mcknight
Graham Armitage
Grant
GreySoul
Henry H
IamSmooth
In memory of Leo Powning
Jacob Cash
James Howells
James Pawson
Jeff Greenfield
Jeff Thomas
Jesse Frost
Jim Mitchell
jlr134
Joe Mastroianni
John Forcina
John Oberg
John Willcutt
Jon Newcomb
klugesmith
Leslie Wright
Lutz Hoffman
Mads Barnkob
Martin King
Mats Karlsson
Matt Gibson
Matthew Guidry
mbd
Michael D'Angelo
Mikkel
mileswaldron
mister_rf
Neil Foster
Nick de Smith
Nick Soroka
nicklenorp
Nik
Norman Stanley
Patrick Coleman
Paul Brodie
Paul Jordan
Paul Montgomery
Ped
Peter Krogen
Peter Terren
PhilGood
Richard Feldman
Robert Bush
Royce Bailey
Scott Fusare
Scott Newman
smiffy
Stella
Steven Busic
Steve Conner
Steve Jones
Steve Ward
Sulaiman
Thomas Coyle
Thomas A. Wallace
Thomas W
Timo
Torch
Ulf Jonsson
vasil
Vaxian
vladi mazzilli
wastehl
Weston
William Kim
William N.
William Stehl
Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Yes, they can. Whether that is useful depends on what you are trying to achieve. In signal processing applications there is often a noise component on top of your signal. Filtering that is possible, but that will affect also the signal. Caps will take away high frequency components of the noise but also those of the signal. So if you are also interested in high frequency components of the signal, that doesn't help.
Registered Member #3414
Joined: Sun Nov 14 2010, 05:05PM
Location: UK
Posts: 4245
I imagine thermal and shot noise to be a quantum thing, which manifests itself as a disturbance which induces an effect similar to that in a geiger counter (very oversimplified).
It's an experimental audio circuit I'm working on, with the ability to switch various different capacitors in and out, so I'll get it boxed up and see what happens.
I'm using diodes as a voltage reference, I've paralleled some, hoping that will help to reduce thermal and shot noise. Does this make sense, or am I on the wrong track?
Edit: The reference voltage is a part of the signal path.
Registered Member #72
Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 08:29AM
Location: UK St. Albans
Posts: 1659
One two port component is one degree of freedom.
Thermal noise (equipartition noise) has a given power per per degree of freedom, the normal 4ktb thang.
If you change the impedance of the component, you change the ratio of voltage and current noise.
Shot and impulse noise occur in addition to thermal noise. Shot noise is a random thing which follows the sqrt(I) expectation, so higher current means better SNR.
Restricting your bandwidth reduces the total observed noise power, but it leaves the SNR unchanged at any given frequency. Restricting your observation bandwidth to your signal bandwidth is a standard processing thing you ought to be doing anyway.
Caps sold as 'snubber' are just as good as any other capacitor for building filters.
Be aware that voltage references are notoriously noisy, especially 'bandgap' types, which achieve their low tempco by taking a small difference between two larger values and amplifying it by a factor of 10. If you don't need thermal stability, then a silicon diode or two fed by a (quiet) constant current will be much quieter.
FWIW, the quietest noise reference I've seen described is a half-discharged lead acid cell. You can model that as a very large capacitor!
Registered Member #162
Joined: Mon Feb 13 2006, 10:25AM
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 3140
Could you use lower noise bandgap (typ. 1v23) reference diodes such as LM385 ?
I'm not keen on the term 'snubber capacitor' in this context as I usually associate it with supression of transient switching spikes, just 'capacitor', or 'bypass capacitor' would be more appropriate, and yes, a capacitor will shunt current noise. Can you show the part of the circuitry in question ?
Thermal noise arises from fluctuations of thermal energy. More specifically, this energy is shared between motion of molecules and also minute electric fields in your device. There is a constant exchange between these energy forms, which leads to a fluctuation of voltages and currents.
Shot noise comes from the discrete values of e.g. charge. If you have a DC current of say, a 100 electrons per second, the number of electrons will rarely be exactly 100 in a given second, but will fluctuate around it. This creates noise.
Similarly in e.g. cameras, light is received in packets, aka photons, which will create noise in your image.
Registered Member #3414
Joined: Sun Nov 14 2010, 05:05PM
Location: UK
Posts: 4245
Thanks for the replies. I was using diodes (LED's) to give me the -ve reference voltage for the gate of a JFET. I've wired it up so I can switch between diodes and resistors, with a parallel cap, and I'm generally preferring the sound of the resistors, and the caps add some real fatness to the sound. Switching the caps in parallel with the diodes doesn't appear to make an audible difference.
There are some new SiC power JFET's out.....Watch this space
Edit: I associate 'snubber' with 'smoothing capacitor'.....It evens out voltage 'irregularities'
Registered Member #162
Joined: Mon Feb 13 2006, 10:25AM
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 3140
It seems that your understanding of 'snubber' is different;
International Rectifier
Cornell Dubilier Snubbers are any of several simple energy absorbing circuits used to eliminate voltage spikes caused by circuit inductance when a switch — either mechanical or semi-conductor—opens
Wikipedia Snubbers are frequently used in electrical systems with an inductive load where the sudden interruption of current flow leads to a sharp rise in voltage across the current switching device, in accordance with Faraday's law. This transient can be a source of electromagnetic interference (EMI) in other circuits. Additionally, if the voltage generated across the device is beyond what the device is intended to tolerate, it may damage or destroy it. The snubber provides a short-term alternative current path around the current switching device so that the inductive element may be discharged more safely and quietly. Inductive elements are often unintentional, but arise from the current loops implied by physical circuitry. While current switching is everywhere, snubbers will generally only be required where a major current path is switched, such as in power supplies. Snubbers are also often used to prevent arcing across the contacts of relays and switches and the electrical interference and welding/sticking of the contacts that can occur (see also arc suppression).
Vishay In power electronics applications, snubber capacitors are in charge of reducing the electromagnetic interference by clamping voltage and current ringing. Directly mounted on IGBT Modules, for stray inductance reduction, Snubber capacitors are supplied in configurable terminals for versatility purpose.
Registered Member #3414
Joined: Sun Nov 14 2010, 05:05PM
Location: UK
Posts: 4245
Sulaiman, I was thinking 'snubber' in the context of eliminating 'spikes' from shot noise. Maybe my interpretation is unconventional, but I see noise as spikes.
Now, a new question about shot noise in particular..... I've a hunch larger wattage resistors will result in less shot noise for a given current.
Does anyone have any 'opinion' either way on this?
Registered Member #11591
Joined: Wed Mar 20 2013, 08:20PM
Location: UK
Posts: 556
the problem is the 'spikes' are minuscule. When ever something is conducting very slightly, a small number of electrons are moving (in mostly random directions, but one direction more than the others). The thing is, the current required to get that low a number of electrons that you will be affected by shot noise is in the sub picoamp level. And capacitors ain't gonna stop it.
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.