Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 21
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
No birthdays today

Next birthdays
04/28 Steve Conner (46)
04/29 GODSFUSION (37)
04/29 Zajcek (37)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: Tesla Coils
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

secondary resonance vs working frequency of the secondary coil

Move Thread LAN_403
Sulaiman
Sat Nov 11 2006, 09:05PM
Sulaiman Registered Member #162 Joined: Mon Feb 13 2006, 10:25AM
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 3140
AFAIK most people buld a TC to get impressive/spectacular arcs
the result will be (mostly) determined by power throughput
so close-coupling, large topload etc. works best.

Tesla didn't want corona/sparks/arcs, high-voltage high-capacitance was more his thing
(wireless transmission of power etc.)

Terry, your graphs clearly show the wavelength characteristics of your resonator;

the coil with topload (toroid similar to coil ... operating below 1/4 wavelength)
shows a nearly linear volts/inch - lumped model reasonably accurate.

the unloaded coil clearly shows the tapering off of volts/inch near the top
if you extrapolate the centre region of the slope
you should get about 90 kV at the topload instead of 70 kV
signs of non-lumped operation.

The resonance effect of Inductance and capacitance
is more significant than the 1/4-wavelength effects
so for practical high power long arc TC forget wire-length effects
and operate well below 1/4 wavelength resonance. (large topload)
but the effect is real and present.

Back to top
IamSmooth
Thu Nov 16 2006, 06:45PM
IamSmooth Registered Member #190 Joined: Fri Feb 17 2006, 12:00AM
Location:
Posts: 1567
Hazmatt_(The Underdog) wrote ...

The permitivity of the conductor 'slows' the wave speed down, and if you look this up in a Belden catalog its something like .66 * speed of light, and that also varies between cables too.

so f = c/v; yea, for light and ideal cases, but not so much here.

So, if I wanted to resonant coil of my secondary with the top load to match the 1/4 wavelength frequency should I use 66-80% the speed of light for the calculation? Does anyone think this will truly affect coil performance?
Back to top
Marko
Thu Nov 16 2006, 06:56PM
Marko Registered Member #89 Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 02:40PM
Location: Zadar, Croatia
Posts: 3145
Does anyone think this will truly affect coil performance?

As said, it won't. Just calculate your inductance, self-capacitance and topload capacitance to get your resonant frequency out.


Back to top
Sulaiman
Thu Nov 16 2006, 08:28PM
Sulaiman Registered Member #162 Joined: Mon Feb 13 2006, 10:25AM
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 3140
If you design your topload to resonate the coil at the 'quarter vavelength' frequency
(assuming c=speed of light in vacuum)
you will certainly be in the right area (below 1/4 wavelength) due to v<c.
So using the speed of light in vacuum with the length of wire to (wrongly) estimate 1/4 wavelength operation the coil will be almost a lumped equivalent/at a good frequency.
Adding a second tuned circuit (the primary) causes frequency-splitting anyway
so the 'operating' frequency will be neither 1/4 wavelength nor 1/2.pi.sqrt(LsCs)
Back to top
teravolt
Fri Nov 17 2006, 05:27AM
teravolt Registered Member #195 Joined: Fri Feb 17 2006, 08:27PM
Location: Berkeley, ca.
Posts: 1111
unless your trying to make a tesla to a specfic frequency 1/4 wave is accademic. When I make a coil I just mesure it then use top load to tune it. Of more inerest is frequency splitting and tuning low.
Back to top

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.