Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 14
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
No birthdays today

Next birthdays
05/04 Matthew T. (35)
05/04 Amrit Deshmukh (60)
05/05 Alexandre (32)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: General Science and Electronics
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

PEM Fuel Cells and Thier Cost.

1 2 
Move Thread LAN_403
Patrick
Sat May 28 2016, 04:11AM Print
Patrick Registered Member #2431 Joined: Tue Oct 13 2009, 09:47PM
Location: Chico, CA. USA
Posts: 5639
I have the following quote for a 12 volt, 500 watt H2 PEM fuel cell. 1.2kg. it does look like the Aerotek 500 is a horizon made product but resold by this company. o ive put in for a direct quote too.

Link2 Spec page.


1464408685 2431 FT0 Fc Pdf
Qoute for alot of $


]electrolyzer_hardware_stacks_- _fuel_cell_store.pdf[/file]

So, some questions...

what makes an electrolyzer so expensive? Do they just have a low volume sales problem in a infant market? or is there labor or what? special metal that justifies almost 4k$ ?

I realize PEM's have platinum in them but it still seems like a lot of $. i knew fuel cells were expensive, but this and the other related products are ridiculous.

given these limitations and the research ive done, its pretty obvious why the market hasnt opened up to this tech, despite all the propaganda from the companies who make them. I remember 21 years ago in science class hearing this stuff was right around the corner.
Back to top
Carbon_Rod
Sat May 28 2016, 08:52AM
Carbon_Rod Registered Member #65 Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 06:43AM
Location:
Posts: 1155
Most current polymer based cells are based on an accidental discovery from the 90's.
The largest manufacturer was gutted for the patents, and driven into bankrupted obscurity.

So today, you can buy an expensive PEM based cell that will slowly get poisoned by trace CO, and eventually stop working well.
Link2

The DoE has done extensive feasibility studies on variants of both low and high temperature catalyst based fuel cells.
Some new research seems to think they can solve the storage issues with high concentration, room temperature, and low pressure liquid peroxides. However, I seem to recall a generation of rocket scientists that failed to make it safe enough for general use.
wink

Primarily, Hydrogen gas is problematic to handle even if corrosion issues are solved:
Link2

Best of luck,
Back to top
Patrick
Sat May 28 2016, 07:01PM
Patrick Registered Member #2431 Joined: Tue Oct 13 2009, 09:47PM
Location: Chico, CA. USA
Posts: 5639
what about mitigating hydrogen embrittlement using fiberglass or carbon ? could that be effective ?

and Horizon seems to be a large player in this market. i keep running into them. i keep running into them.

and, what lifecycle do the PEM's have before the CO poisoning really effects performance ? just an order of magnitude, like 10, 100 or more hours to decrease by 10%. or is there some formal way the industry describes this reduction in useful life.

My purpose is for small ground and under water bots. so 2 or 3 hours at a time. maybe 1000 hours total life of the stack.
Back to top
Carbon_Rod
Sun May 29 2016, 12:32AM
Carbon_Rod Registered Member #65 Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 06:43AM
Location:
Posts: 1155
"what about mitigating hydrogen embrittlement using fiberglass or carbon ? could that be effective ?"
The prototype H2 vehicles from the local facility generally use carbon-fiber composite wrapped storage tanks.
At the time, I didn't ask about the metal alloy they used for the pressure vessel.

"and Horizon seems to be a large player in this market. i keep running into them. "
Indeed, they seem to be one of the few groups still trying to make it practical for consumer use.
A few years back...I seem to recall thinking their $2k 200W kit was outrageously overpriced...
wink

"and, what lifecycle do the PEM's have before the CO poisoning really effects performance ?"
I was told it was a trace contamination problem, but can't recall much of the research on the chemistry.
We were more interested it the support hardware at the time:
Link2

"My purpose is for small ground and under water bots. so 2 or 3 hours at a time. maybe 1000 hours total life of the stack"
Having built on both platforms, I can assure you that there are quite a few design differences in these systems.

Mass and energy density are important for "ground" vehicle range:
A 24v 20ah LiFePO4 e-bike power pack already comes with a charger system, and you could buy over 100/pcs for the price you were quoted.
Link2
The range estimate is "1 mile per amp" for e-bike users, but I seem to recall around 2Ah/km of flat terrain for autonomous robots.

"under water bots" mean the Buoyant Mass == Ballast (energy density is less important for surface craft):
There are now full sized craft using LiFe power systems, but in water these things have an endless list of trade-offs.
Note, automotive style lead acid industrial marine batteries have well over 200 Ah, and for the unit price one gets 4x the run-time for much less hassle. Note, Pb cells don't state they need venting, but precautions should be taken seriously.

1000 hours is a long run-time unless the units are in standby, and you may need to start thinking about generation/sail options.
The Li cells will last 2k+ charge cycles, as long as you don't deep cycle discharge over 20% of the labelled capacity.

Good luck,
wink
Back to top
Bored Chemist
Sun May 29 2016, 09:40AM
Bored Chemist Registered Member #193 Joined: Fri Feb 17 2006, 07:04AM
Location: sheffield
Posts: 1022
Carbon_Rod wrote ...


So today, you can buy an expensive PEM based cell that will slowly get poisoned by trace CO, and eventually stop working well.
Link2

Then don't put CO in them.
Back to top
Patrick
Mon May 30 2016, 02:17AM
Patrick Registered Member #2431 Joined: Tue Oct 13 2009, 09:47PM
Location: Chico, CA. USA
Posts: 5639
Bored Chemist wrote ...

Then don't put CO in them.
It slowly appears.

ANd on a seperate note:

1464578056 2431 FT1630 Graph
How do methanol fuel cells age? is it similar to one of the above graphs ?
Back to top
Bored Chemist
Mon May 30 2016, 12:00PM
Bored Chemist Registered Member #193 Joined: Fri Feb 17 2006, 07:04AM
Location: sheffield
Posts: 1022
Patrick wrote ...

Bored Chemist wrote ...

Then don't put CO in them.
It slowly appears.


How?
Where does the carbon come from?
Back to top
klugesmith
Tue May 31 2016, 06:50AM
klugesmith Registered Member #2099 Joined: Wed Apr 29 2009, 12:22AM
Location: Los Altos, California
Posts: 1714
Bored Chemist wrote ...

Patrick wrote ...
It slowly appears.
How?
Where does the carbon come from?
This thread is the first time I heard of CO poisoning of hydrogen fuel cells.

Many people, apparently including Elon Musk, think that the "hydrogen economy" is supposed to use hydrogen made by electrolysis of water. Pretty darn inefficient way to store electricity.

Ask a big user of hydrogen (e.g. for making ammonia or refining petroleum, not little stuff like space shuttle fuel tanks) where it comes from. They'll say "the vast majority is prepared by steam reforming of natural gas". Link2

So hydrogen is primarily a low-density fossil fuel product, noteworthy for low carbon emission at the time & place of consumption as fuel.

Here is a small format self-powered reforming system, using methanol, that produces enough H2 to run 2.5 to 7.5 kW of fuel cells. Link2 Link2 I would not be surprised if told that its output includes measurable traces of CO.




Back to top
johnf
Tue May 31 2016, 06:51AM
johnf Registered Member #230 Joined: Tue Feb 21 2006, 08:01PM
Location: Gracefield lower Hutt
Posts: 284
Because you are stripping ions in the PEM you get active ions looking for mates with enough energy to break up a happy couple. For air 300ppm co2. "O" ion with energy looking for mate has the chance to steal an "O" from co2 to form CO and O2.
Even worse for the methanol based cells as there are much more carbons to play with M2CentsW
Back to top
Patrick
Tue May 31 2016, 05:30PM
Patrick Registered Member #2431 Joined: Tue Oct 13 2009, 09:47PM
Location: Chico, CA. USA
Posts: 5639
klugesmith wrote ...

Many people, apparently including Elon Musk, think that the "hydrogen economy" is supposed to use hydrogen made by electrolysis of water. Pretty darn inefficient way to store electricity.

Yes, here in California, without enormous government subsidies fuel cells and solar cells wouldn't last at all in the market place. Solyndra in my home town of Fremont CA, comes to mind. We have a political class here that just has to cram this tech into the market place. We have endless commercials on our radio and TV wanting to install wind or solar, at almost no cost, theres a lot of fine print though on those contracts.
Back to top
1 2 

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.