Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 33
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
All today's birthdays', congrats!
Linas (34)
Toasty (29)


Next birthdays
05/16 kg7bz (68)
05/16 steve516 (31)
05/17 Finn Hammer (72)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: General Chatting
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

Add your flying disc craft here

Move Thread LAN_403
Conundrum
Wed Apr 01 2015, 07:11AM Print
Conundrum Registered Member #96 Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 05:37PM
Location: CI, Earth
Posts: 4059
Hi all.

Has anyone here actually managed to build any large (ie >1m diameter) model lenticular (ie disc shaped) craft?
I had a look at examples on the Internet and it seems that Coanda effect craft do exist and thanks to advanced LiPo cells molded into the aluminium casing can be quite sturdy indeed with large counter rotating fans inside 3D printed over carbon for maximum efficiency.

It occurs to me that a lot of existing models have a habit of being unstable in high winds, whereas a disc or lenticular shaped craft with feedback to hold it in position and ducted fans inside could hold its own so to speak without expending anywhere near as much power.

As far as powering it, retractable segmented Fresnel lenses and solar cells on the top might work here as landing it for a short time say 1 hour would allow it to "hop" to its destination just as some birds land briefly while over small islands to let the motors cool down and fully recharge the onboard batteries.
Taking off again would just be a matter of dumping the supercapacitor bank(s) into the motors to overcome gravity and then substitute with battery power once airborne.

-A

Back to top
Avi
Tue Apr 07 2015, 02:48PM
Avi Registered Member #580 Joined: Mon Mar 12 2007, 03:17PM
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 410
The topic, vs the post content do not match, and is quite misleading, seems like you are asking for design help for >1m diameter models.
Back to top
dexter
Tue Apr 07 2015, 03:00PM
dexter Registered Member #42796 Joined: Mon Jan 13 2014, 06:34PM
Location:
Posts: 195
add yours first....
Back to top
Ash Small
Tue Apr 07 2015, 06:01PM
Ash Small Registered Member #3414 Joined: Sun Nov 14 2010, 05:05PM
Location: UK
Posts: 4245
Weve done the maths for one of these in another thread. It's always a trade-off between efficiency and manouverability. Efficiency requires low disc loading and manouverability requires high disc loading.

We set out to design for efficiency and ended up with four 30" rotors. We've also realised we want to spin them so the tips almost go supersonic, AND we need the profiles to be 'perfect' in oder to get laminar fow.

Most commercially available drone rotors are designed for very high disc loadings. This results in good manouverability but poor flight times/payload capacity.
Back to top
Conundrum
Tue Apr 07 2015, 07:35PM
Conundrum Registered Member #96 Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 05:37PM
Location: CI, Earth
Posts: 4059
Hmm.
Wonder if a hybrid ion wind/rotor system would work?
ie blow air through an ion plate arrangement past thin wires, like a boosted ionocraft?
But negatively charge the motors and props to -10KV as well so the gaps can be larger for more thrust.
Back to top
Ash Small
Tue Apr 07 2015, 10:59PM
Ash Small Registered Member #3414 Joined: Sun Nov 14 2010, 05:05PM
Location: UK
Posts: 4245
The title of the thread has changed since I last posted.

More thrust equals higher disc loading, which equals poor efficiency.
Back to top
Conundrum
Wed Apr 08 2015, 04:07AM
Conundrum Registered Member #96 Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 05:37PM
Location: CI, Earth
Posts: 4059
Yeah, it was pointed out that there was a mismatch.

How would the poor efficiency be overcome?
I thought maybe use a rotating porous surface (ie tiny holes) and blow air through these to exploit boundary layer effects.
ie the two surfaces spin in opposite directions with a central nexus containing the controls and gyros.
Back to top
Ash Small
Wed Apr 08 2015, 09:03AM
Ash Small Registered Member #3414 Joined: Sun Nov 14 2010, 05:05PM
Location: UK
Posts: 4245
Conundrum wrote ...



How would the poor efficiency be overcome?



All the losses are from the periphery of the column of accelerated air. If this column is fast moving and of small area, losses are huge. If the column is slow moving with a large area, losses are negligible.

Refer to the 'drag equation' for the detail.
Back to top

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.