Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 15
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
One birthday today, congrats!
AlexRU73 (39)


Next birthdays
05/19 cbfull (52)
05/19 Steve Ward (39)
05/20 Vaxian (17)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: Electromagnetic Radiation
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

Omnidirectional resonant inductive wireless power?

Move Thread LAN_403
BigBad
Thu Oct 24 2013, 12:54PM
BigBad Registered Member #2529 Joined: Thu Dec 10 2009, 02:43AM
Location:
Posts: 600
OK, let's look at this from a sphere at the 'far field'; really good idea.

The thing is that the dipole moment vector doesn't have to rotate in a circle around the sphere; it can take arbitrarily shaped closed loops.

Imagine if you have a hundred phases, and the angles of the coils are arranged around a loop, but the angles of the coils wobble up and down above and through the horizontal, even reaching the vertical, and then coming back again before closing the loop. As the phase spins around the field will cover every angle of the sphere, so the receiver will be excited whatever angle it's at; it won't be exactly lined up, but it will be within the right angle to cut the flux and absorb the energy at some point of the cycle.
Back to top
Uspring
Thu Oct 24 2013, 01:54PM
Uspring Registered Member #3988 Joined: Thu Jul 07 2011, 03:25PM
Location:
Posts: 711
BigBad wrote:
The thing is that the dipole moment vector doesn't have to rotate in a circle around the sphere; it can take arbitrarily shaped closed loops.
It can be an ellipse but not more than that. Here's the proof:
The dipole moment of each of the solenoids is

Xi * Ai * cos(w*t+Pi)

where the X's are the vectors pointing along the axes of the solenoids, i.e. the directions of each dipole moment. Ai are the amplitudes and Pi the phases. The i's are indices.

This can be written as the real part of

Xi * Ai * e^(j*w*t+j*Pi)

which is the same as

Xi * Ai * e^(j*Pi) * e^(j*w*t)

You can factor out the term e^(j*w*t) because it does not depend on i. The term in front of it

Xi * Ai * e^(j*Pi)

can be summed up over all i's and the sum is a vector with a real and imaginary part, e.g.

Vreal + j*Vim

The summed result is then

(Vreal + j*Vim) * e^(j*w*t)

The real part of this is the total dipole moment

Vreal * cos(w*t) - Vim * sin(w*t)

This is a vector drawing out ellipses in space and could be achieved by 2 solenoids oriented along Vreal and Vim.




Back to top
BigBad
Thu Oct 24 2013, 02:15PM
BigBad Registered Member #2529 Joined: Thu Dec 10 2009, 02:43AM
Location:
Posts: 600
That's actually pretty damn cool.

So you have to use slightly different frequencies for the three different axes, which also helps with the coupling issue, since they won't correlate. That WILL work, you won't get ellipses, you'll get Lissajous figures which fill space just fine.
Back to top
Uspring
Thu Oct 24 2013, 02:37PM
Uspring Registered Member #3988 Joined: Thu Jul 07 2011, 03:25PM
Location:
Posts: 711
Yes, that will have a resemblance to phased array radar beacons roaming in all directions.

Back to top
Ash Small
Thu Oct 24 2013, 06:02PM
Ash Small Registered Member #3414 Joined: Sun Nov 14 2010, 05:05PM
Location: UK
Posts: 4245
Copy and paste didn't work too well with this quote, but the full formulae, etc. are here: Link2

"One other observation is worth mentioning. As long as the frequency
ratio !1=!2 is a rational number, the curve—no matter
how complex—will eventually repeat itself, causing the motion
to be periodic.2 But if !1=!2 is irrational, the point P will never
retrace its own path, resulting in a non-periodic motion. However,
as time progresses the curve will gradually fill the rectangle
bounded by the lines x D a; y D b (fig. 72)."


1382638957 3414 FT1630 Lissajou
Back to top
twist2b
Tue Nov 05 2013, 08:12PM
twist2b Registered Member #2086 Joined: Tue Apr 21 2009, 02:33AM
Location:
Posts: 117
You should also look into as the "antenna" using fractals. It's used in the receiver to pickup multiple bands of frequencies. The problem with making a omnidirectional resonance is that it reduces the strength...
Link2
This website helps a lot in understanding directivity and field strength. Antennas in towers used for cell phones are actually setup in a very simple "fractal" system so that they are effectively omnidirectional to an extent.
Back to top
BigBad
Tue Nov 12 2013, 05:14PM
BigBad Registered Member #2529 Joined: Thu Dec 10 2009, 02:43AM
Location:
Posts: 600
Oh yeah, while I remember, there's one other way to get omni power that I found.

If you use two orthogonal coils with 90 degree phasing at the transmitter, and you have two orthogonal coils at the receiver, it's physically impossible for them to be at 90 degrees to each other over the whole cycle.
Back to top
radiotech
Mon Nov 25 2013, 03:21AM
radiotech Registered Member #2463 Joined: Wed Nov 11 2009, 03:49AM
Location:
Posts: 1546
What about the use of Helmholtz coils that give a uniform field in a given space? Then
at any point in that space, that field could excite your resonant circuit. Link2
Back to top
BigBad
Tue Nov 26 2013, 10:36PM
BigBad Registered Member #2529 Joined: Thu Dec 10 2009, 02:43AM
Location:
Posts: 600
Not sure whether that works as well as you'd expect, IRC when I modelled it before, if you put the two coils together rather than separate you end up with 4 times the field at the same point in space because the inductance is a square law on the number of turns.
Back to top

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.