Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 29
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
One birthday today, congrats!
Colin 99 (53)


Next birthdays
05/14 hvguy (41)
05/14 thehappyelectron (14)
05/14 Justin (2024)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: Electromagnetic Projectile Accelerators
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

Forumula for calculating the force on a coilgun's projectile?

 1 2 3
Move Thread LAN_403
Yanom
Tue Mar 19 2013, 01:52AM
Yanom Registered Member #4659 Joined: Sun Apr 29 2012, 06:14PM
Location:
Posts: 158
wrote ...
Permeability is a factor if you are operating anywhere over ~ 60% (very rough estimate) of saturation, where the B/H curve starts to become noticeably non-linear - L becomes dependent on I as well as on geometry.

aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahhh, that make sense. Does anyone have math for calculating the inductance based on this fact?
Back to top
BigBad
Tue Mar 19 2013, 05:36AM
BigBad Registered Member #2529 Joined: Thu Dec 10 2009, 02:43AM
Location:
Posts: 600
IIUC there's two types of relative permeability. There's relative to mu_o, and there's differential relative permeability; basically the slope on the curve.

You can calculate the slope easily enough, even where it's non linear, but to calculate the inductance of a significantly non linear material, you pretty much just have to run FEMM on it.
Back to top
Yanom
Fri Mar 22 2013, 02:29PM
Yanom Registered Member #4659 Joined: Sun Apr 29 2012, 06:14PM
Location:
Posts: 158
Yanom wrote ...

wrote ...
Permeability is a factor if you are operating anywhere over ~ 60% (very rough estimate) of saturation, where the B/H curve starts to become noticeably non-linear - L becomes dependent on I as well as on geometry.

aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahhh, that make sense. Does anyone have math for calculating the inductance based on this fact?

I found this:
http://www.beigebag.com/case_nonlinear_ind.htm

about nonlinear (saturating) inductors, which is basically what we're talking about here.
Back to top
2Spoons
Sun Mar 24 2013, 10:18PM
2Spoons Registered Member #2939 Joined: Fri Jun 25 2010, 04:25AM
Location:
Posts: 615
Modelling of non-linear inductors in SPICE circuits makes one VERY important assumption : that the core flux is uniform - i.e. an equal degree of saturation everywhere. This may or may not be the case for a core in a solenoid with a large air gap. You will see this if you play about with FEMM for a while.
Back to top
Yanom
Tue Mar 26 2013, 02:32AM
Yanom Registered Member #4659 Joined: Sun Apr 29 2012, 06:14PM
Location:
Posts: 158
is the saturation level (roughly) constant through a piece of iron? (Like how the electrostatic charge is constant in a conductor)?

or, is it possible for the front of the projectile to be saturated and the back to be unsaturated?
Back to top
BigBad
Tue Mar 26 2013, 11:22PM
BigBad Registered Member #2529 Joined: Thu Dec 10 2009, 02:43AM
Location:
Posts: 600
Iron is very, very permeable so the magnetic field will even out pretty well, so it will be roughly constant saturation; side to side across the projectile at least.

But front to back will often show larger differences for geometric reasons; the flux will leak out the sides of the projectile, because it's trying to close the size of the flux loops down (as it were).
Back to top
Yanom
Tue Apr 02 2013, 01:32AM
Yanom Registered Member #4659 Joined: Sun Apr 29 2012, 06:14PM
Location:
Posts: 158
hmmm. in FEMM, inductance is determined by Flux/Current (in the Circuits dialog on the .ans page), right?

I used the attached FEMM file (a coil + a projectile) to test the inductance a different current levels, from 1 AmpTurn to 1,000,000,000 AmpTurns. Flux/Current is
.00056 Henries at 1AT,
.00056 H at 1,000AT,
and .0002H at 1,000,000AT,
and .0002H at 1,000,000,000AT.

not sure what to make of all that.


Femm File:
buffer.fem
Back to top
BigBad
Wed Apr 03 2013, 06:20PM
BigBad Registered Member #2529 Joined: Thu Dec 10 2009, 02:43AM
Location:
Posts: 600
Yeah, i reproduced that.

What I think is happening is that the iron is short circuiting half the flux loop at low gauss; the rest of the loop goes through the air.

At high gauss it saturates at 2-odd tesla, and the rest of the flux is just acting as if it's air cored; and at sufficiently high gauss that dominates the inductance; the iron does virtually nothing.

So the iron is roughly halving the reluctance and doubling the inductance at 'low' gauss; I haven't tested it, but if you close the magnetic circuit better, you'll get much higher inductance at low gauss, but the high gauss figure will be virtually unchanged.
Back to top
 1 2 3

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.