Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 16
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
One birthday today, congrats!
AlexRU73 (39)


Next birthdays
05/19 cbfull (52)
05/19 Steve Ward (39)
05/20 Vaxian (17)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: Electromagnetic Radiation
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

.

Move Thread LAN_403
Ruskie
Wed Jan 23 2013, 12:48AM Print
Ruskie Registered Member #9290 Joined: Sat Jan 05 2013, 03:42PM
Location:
Posts: 60
.
Back to top
Vlad
Thu Jan 31 2013, 01:24PM
Vlad Registered Member #9711 Joined: Sat Jan 19 2013, 03:27PM
Location:
Posts: 65
I think I can answer this, but there is more than one answer. If you just operate a dental tube with low lead content and a normal glass window (not a metal window), the you could probably expect useful visual fluoroscopic capabilities at roughly 40 KV @ 1 mA. I define "useful" as having the best screen available (such as a low energy mammography screen) and being able to fairly easily see the fluorescence on the screen with normal room lighting. Of course, there are a couple of other factors such as tube distance, etc, but generally the 40/1 figures hold. Now if you are not seeking such output, like using time exposures, then you could get away with much less. If you darkened the screen, for example, and used a good digital camera with low noise thresholds, then you could get away with 25-40 KV @ as little as 50-100 uA.

The other option is to use an x-ray image intensifier. When I was in college and did x-ray studies as part of a lower level atomic physics course, we *always* used image intensifiers to greatly reduce exposure to students and staff. Using our intensifiers, we almost always got away with 15-20 KV @ 50-100 uA or even less!

Why more folks haven't used them is somewhat baffling. Like x-ray tubes and machines, they too have appeared on the surplus market and are easy to energize and operate. Power suppply issues and of course unknown tube hours are the major drawbacks, but don't spend much on a surplus unit in the first place. However, unless you want to use a lot of lead shielding to cut the higher energy rays, an x-ray intensifier might be a much safer alternative. You can also image using uraninite and other radioactive minerals with this device. Not clear of course, but possible.

Get yourself an intensifier and be much safer with your experiments. Cut back to 20 KV or less, check out your shielding, and have fun!
Back to top
Ruskie
Sat Feb 02 2013, 11:24AM
Ruskie Registered Member #9290 Joined: Sat Jan 05 2013, 03:42PM
Location:
Posts: 60
.
Back to top

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.