If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.
Special Thanks To:
Aaron Holmes
Aaron Wheeler
Adam Horden
Alan Scrimgeour
Andre
Andrew Haynes
Anonymous000
asabase
Austin Weil
barney
Barry
Bert Hickman
Bill Kukowski
Blitzorn
Brandon Paradelas
Bruce Bowling
BubeeMike
Byong Park
Cesiumsponge
Chris F.
Chris Hooper
Corey Worthington
Derek Woodroffe
Dalus
Dan Strother
Daniel Davis
Daniel Uhrenholt
datasheetarchive
Dave Billington
Dave Marshall
David F.
Dennis Rogers
drelectrix
Dr. John Gudenas
Dr. Spark
E.TexasTesla
eastvoltresearch
Eirik Taylor
Erik Dyakov
Erlend^SE
Finn Hammer
Firebug24k
GalliumMan
Gary Peterson
George Slade
GhostNull
Gordon Mcknight
Graham Armitage
Grant
GreySoul
Henry H
IamSmooth
In memory of Leo Powning
Jacob Cash
James Howells
James Pawson
Jeff Greenfield
Jeff Thomas
Jesse Frost
Jim Mitchell
jlr134
Joe Mastroianni
John Forcina
John Oberg
John Willcutt
Jon Newcomb
klugesmith
Leslie Wright
Lutz Hoffman
Mads Barnkob
Martin King
Mats Karlsson
Matt Gibson
Matthew Guidry
mbd
Michael D'Angelo
Mikkel
mileswaldron
mister_rf
Neil Foster
Nick de Smith
Nick Soroka
nicklenorp
Nik
Norman Stanley
Patrick Coleman
Paul Brodie
Paul Jordan
Paul Montgomery
Ped
Peter Krogen
Peter Terren
PhilGood
Richard Feldman
Robert Bush
Royce Bailey
Scott Fusare
Scott Newman
smiffy
Stella
Steven Busic
Steve Conner
Steve Jones
Steve Ward
Sulaiman
Thomas Coyle
Thomas A. Wallace
Thomas W
Timo
Torch
Ulf Jonsson
vasil
Vaxian
vladi mazzilli
wastehl
Weston
William Kim
William N.
William Stehl
Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Registered Member #259
Joined: Sun Feb 26 2006, 05:57PM
Location: Friday Harbor, Wa
Posts: 18
I have recently aquired a vacuum system that can pump down a decent volume to 10-5 torr. I am also building a 100kV C-W multiplier. The idea of combining the two is exciting. I have seen various websites with vacuum tubes made of insulating material accelerating electrons with high voltage supplies. 100keV electrons are obviously cool and useful for many things. What would be the minimum tube length that allows for the electrons to be accelerated to the full velocity? The kinematic equations are basic, but what is the force on the electron as it travels through the tube? Is seems that it would change with distance. Any help appreciated!
Registered Member #72
Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 08:29AM
Location: UK St. Albans
Posts: 1659
Rather than worry about integrating force and suchlike, go for the easy route and consider energy. Once the electron has fallen through 100kV, it will have an energy of 100keV. I think this is still non-relativistic speed, so if you want the velocity from this just invert E=1/2mv2 (in consistent units of course), where m is the electron rest mass.
The minimum tube length is that which will withstand the voltage difference without breaking down. A hard vacuum is very strong, but you might find that 5torr will support long discharge columns, do some research into gas discharges.
One thing 100keV electrons are very useful for is making Xrays when they hit heavy atoms in the anode. You might want to consider shielding, distance or only short run times to protect yourself from exposure
<edit> duh, idiot me, I wondered why I thought 5torr wasn't the good vacuum you asserted, but 10^-5 is rather better </edit>
Registered Member #162
Joined: Mon Feb 13 2006, 10:25AM
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 3140
As above, the minimum distance is that required to prevent flashover.
The maximum distance is determined by 'mean free path' which for air at room temperature is approximately 5m @ 10-5 torr (500mm @ 10-4 torr etc.) so unlikely to be a problem at your working pressure.
100 keV electrons will not penetrate very far, about 0.1mm water/skin so not very useful as an electron beam/death ray.
(you'd better check my figures, 25 year old memories here)
Also, as above, consider accidental x-ray generation hazard.
Registered Member #10
Joined: Thu Feb 02 2006, 09:45AM
Location: Bunbury, Australia
Posts: 1424
Sulaiman wrote ...
.... 100 keV electrons will not penetrate very far, about 0.1mm water/skin so not very useful as an electron beam/death ray. (you'd better check my figures, 25 year old memories here)..
As I understand, modern x-ray machines use perhaps 125 keV for "big" people so it certainly gets through more than 0.1mm. Also consider the x-ray aperture as a lot of simple glass blowing is lead glass and opaque to x-rays. Use soda glass instead perhaps. When making glassware more important is surface tracking which at 3 times a room air spark distance will be 15 inches minimum that needs to be allowed for on the outside.
The beam distance in an x-ray tube with a pretty good vacuum is only an inch on the outside and all oil enclosed.
Registered Member #259
Joined: Sun Feb 26 2006, 05:57PM
Location: Friday Harbor, Wa
Posts: 18
15 inches to prevent the skin effect? I will to some testing of materials to find out just how small I can make it. As for shielding and exposure time, no kidding! I will be careful. Immersing a smaller tube in an oil was mentioned. Pyrex in Mineral Oil?
Registered Member #190
Joined: Fri Feb 17 2006, 12:00AM
Location:
Posts: 1567
Just to give a point of reference, in the radiology suite they use about 70-85KV routinely for flouroscopy on the average-sized individual. 100KV will certainly be a problem and I would avoid the exposure. If you really want to do this I suggest you get a radiation badge and monitor your exposure. You don't want to delude yourself that you are protected only to find out in 10 years as you look at a picture of your cool electron tube that you are dying from lymphoma.
Registered Member #65
Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 06:43AM
Location:
Posts: 1155
NeilThomas and BC pointed out this can be a very unhealthy apparatus to be around -- and I fully agree.
Even multi-stage accelerators will have numerous shielding precautions and in fact can prove just as dangerous if one happened to wander into the targeting chamber during operation.
If you have to ask how it’s done then you are unlikely knowledgeable enough yet to safely handle the physics involved. Be patient in your studies as the nature of the universe is unlikely going to abruptly change anytime soon.
Registered Member #259
Joined: Sun Feb 26 2006, 05:57PM
Location: Friday Harbor, Wa
Posts: 18
Peter Bradly at Houghton college has a very good paper on the constuction of a similar accelerator, though of twice the voltage. He did a careful measurement of the x-ray and gamma radiation, and found that even right next to the fully energized device it would take 10 hours to reach the recommended yearly exposure. As for my own device, I will be purchasing a reliable geiger counter and will be working with an ex-nuclear engineer. Radmax Lead sheilding is cheap, and will cover the device with the greatest practical thickness. Distance will be kept to a maximum, with remote control unites, and exposure time a minimum, with only short pulses of power supply. Sound good?
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.