Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 21
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
No birthdays today

Next birthdays
05/11 ramses (16)
05/11 Arcstarter (31)
05/11 Zak (15)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: Electromagnetic Projectile Accelerators
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

Low power coils more efficient?

Move Thread LAN_403
Yanom
Thu Oct 18 2012, 03:20AM Print
Yanom Registered Member #4659 Joined: Sun Apr 29 2012, 06:14PM
Location:
Posts: 158
So, i had a lengthy discussion on the General Science and Electronics board about coil efficiency. As it turns out, as you pump progressively more and more power into a coil, you start to get less of a magnetic field per watt of electricity. However, there is apparently a non-linear relationship between magnetic field (and thus, power supplied to coil) and the force exerted on a coilgun bullet.

So, are smaller, lower power coils more efficient on coilguns? Is that why multistage coilguns exist, because many small coils are more efficient than one big one?
Back to top
Pinky's Brain
Thu Oct 18 2012, 04:17AM
Pinky's Brain Registered Member #2901 Joined: Thu Jun 03 2010, 01:25PM
Location:
Posts: 837
Yanom wrote ...

So, i had a lengthy discussion on the General Science and Electronics board about coil efficiency. As it turns out, as you pump progressively more and more power into a coil, you start to get less of a magnetic field per watt of electricity.
Yes, but the force a solenoid imparts on a magnet or ferromagnetic object is not linear with the field strength ... it's a quadratic function. Look here :

Link2

Lets say we can ignore the depth and winding stacking height of solenoids for a moment. We have an iron plate and we pull on it with these two set ups at distance g :

- 1 solenoid with C copper, A area, using P power to generate F ampere turns

- 2 solenoids each with 1/2 C copper, A area. using 1/4*P power to generate 1/2*F ampere turns each (separated from each other of course, because if you stack them they simply ARE the first solenoid!). They generate more ampere turns per Watt just like you say ...

What would be the total force imparted on the plate?

For the first it will be F^2*u0*A/(2*g^2), for the second 2*(1/2*F)^2*u0*A/(2*g^2) ... only half as much!

To generate just as much force the two solenoids would have to use 1/2*P power to generate 1/2*(sqrt(2))*F ampere turns each ... so combined exactly as much power as the first solenoid. As I said in the first post in the former thread, TANSTAAFL.

Now in practice you can not ignore the length and stacking height of the windings of the solenoid ... and THAT is why two solenoids might be better than one (as well things like pull back, inefficiency when not close to the slug etc). But there is no theoretical advantage in the way you think.

PS. hope no one read that as I was editing it for 5 minutes to get the bugs out :)
Back to top

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.