If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.
Special Thanks To:
Aaron Holmes
Aaron Wheeler
Adam Horden
Alan Scrimgeour
Andre
Andrew Haynes
Anonymous000
asabase
Austin Weil
barney
Barry
Bert Hickman
Bill Kukowski
Blitzorn
Brandon Paradelas
Bruce Bowling
BubeeMike
Byong Park
Cesiumsponge
Chris F.
Chris Hooper
Corey Worthington
Derek Woodroffe
Dalus
Dan Strother
Daniel Davis
Daniel Uhrenholt
datasheetarchive
Dave Billington
Dave Marshall
David F.
Dennis Rogers
drelectrix
Dr. John Gudenas
Dr. Spark
E.TexasTesla
eastvoltresearch
Eirik Taylor
Erik Dyakov
Erlend^SE
Finn Hammer
Firebug24k
GalliumMan
Gary Peterson
George Slade
GhostNull
Gordon Mcknight
Graham Armitage
Grant
GreySoul
Henry H
IamSmooth
In memory of Leo Powning
Jacob Cash
James Howells
James Pawson
Jeff Greenfield
Jeff Thomas
Jesse Frost
Jim Mitchell
jlr134
Joe Mastroianni
John Forcina
John Oberg
John Willcutt
Jon Newcomb
klugesmith
Leslie Wright
Lutz Hoffman
Mads Barnkob
Martin King
Mats Karlsson
Matt Gibson
Matthew Guidry
mbd
Michael D'Angelo
Mikkel
mileswaldron
mister_rf
Neil Foster
Nick de Smith
Nick Soroka
nicklenorp
Nik
Norman Stanley
Patrick Coleman
Paul Brodie
Paul Jordan
Paul Montgomery
Ped
Peter Krogen
Peter Terren
PhilGood
Richard Feldman
Robert Bush
Royce Bailey
Scott Fusare
Scott Newman
smiffy
Stella
Steven Busic
Steve Conner
Steve Jones
Steve Ward
Sulaiman
Thomas Coyle
Thomas A. Wallace
Thomas W
Timo
Torch
Ulf Jonsson
vasil
Vaxian
vladi mazzilli
wastehl
Weston
William Kim
William N.
William Stehl
Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Registered Member #175
Joined: Tue Feb 14 2006, 09:32PM
Location: Sudbury, ON
Posts: 111
It doesn't say Rolfs doesn't have an idea--just that it doesn't conform to standard theory.
This goes along with a thought I had a while ago: if you cooled a radioactive substance so far as to get it near the Bose-Einstien condensate range, woudln't it tend to go all at once? This could be similar, maybe?
Registered Member #158
Joined: Sun Feb 12 2006, 09:53PM
Location: Central Ohio
Posts: 282
It may be rubbish, but cool it to 0 degree K and I am sure the decay rate would change... if only that were possible. But even if it would change by 1000 times at a few degrees K you would still have to cool it for hundreds or thousands of years still at that temp... which would probably be a very expensive venture. Plus the radioactive waste would probably be emitting 1000 times the normal amount of radiation since the rate of decay was increased that much? I see some problems with the increased radiation, and cost of cooling along with potential problems maintaining the cooling systems.
Registered Member #188
Joined: Thu Feb 16 2006, 05:18PM
Location:
Posts: 67
Bored Chemist wrote ...
An atom does not know how hot it is. I think this is utter rubbish.
Sounds a lot like BS but the mechanism described would make a little sense IMHO. Needs more investigation to be sure.
Also, wouldnt it be a little impractical to supercool large amounts of radioactive waste? Could also be that a given amount of waste contaminates a much larger amount of material of the apperatus during that operation too.
Registered Member #65
Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 06:43AM
Location:
Posts: 1155
BC has a point – the technology sounds pretty far-fetched and should be treated with scepticism. The detectors area of exposure would have to be taken into account. Perhaps there are contaminated materials (when molten) that appear to change the actual decay rate of the source material per cubic centimetre -- yet the source of the actual contamination remains consistent with known standard rates of decay.
They should talk to a metallurgist and see if they can reclaim higher levels of the depleted materials they claim to produce so quickly.
Registered Member #193
Joined: Fri Feb 17 2006, 07:04AM
Location: sheffield
Posts: 1022
There are a few problems with this idea First and formeost; it doesn't happen when other people try it.
"However, critics say his idea doesn't hold up, that it contradicts existing theory as well as other experimental results. Nick Stone, a retired nuclear physicist from Oxford University, told Physics Web that experiments with cooled, metal embedded alpha emitters had already been run by other physicists, and that no reduction in half life had been observed."
Secondly, the variability of electron capture rates with electron density at the nucleus is well known. It was well enough documented that it popped up in my university final exams back in '87. It's a fairly good way of measuring electron density at the nucleus (and, therefore s orbital contribution). But (and here's the killer) it has next to nothing to do with alpha decay. (Can anyone find me an isotope where both EC and alpha decay occur and with a half life worth bothering with?)
The 3rd aspect is that for metals most of the electrons are in or near (elctronic) ground states at room temperature anyway- cooling them won't make much difference to the s orbital contribution.
Even if it did work (and it doesn't, as the other experiments have shown) it wouldn't help much in practice. Radioactivity generates heat so it is difficult to maintain a radioactive samples near absolute zero. If you reduce the half life (presumably, by magic) you increase the rate of heat production so it becomes even more difficult to keep them cool.
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.