Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 24
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
No birthdays today

Next birthdays
05/11 ramses (16)
05/11 Arcstarter (31)
05/11 Zak (15)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: Electromagnetic Projectile Accelerators
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

Which type of coilgun is the most efficient?

Move Thread LAN_403
AndrewM
Wed Dec 28 2011, 03:48PM Print
AndrewM Registered Member #49 Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 04:05AM
Location: Bigass Pile of Penguins
Posts: 362
In terms of kinetic energy transfer, single stage, which type of coil gun could be considered the most efficient. I don't care about velocity, only efficiency, so if need be assume an optimal projectile for each type, even if said projectile is 20 pounds.

Reluctance?
Induction?
Disk/Pancake?
Thompson Ring?
Back to top
JohnL
Thu Dec 29 2011, 02:24AM
JohnL Registered Member #3842 Joined: Thu Apr 21 2011, 12:19PM
Location:
Posts: 10
As far as I know, disk launchers and thompson rings are just induction launchers. Fastmhz has managed to get almost 10% efficiency with pancake coil induction launchers. I haven't got more than 2.3% efficency with reluctance coilguns.

EDIT: Here's a link to fastmhz site http://fastmhz.com/?p=33
Back to top
PSCG
Thu Dec 29 2011, 08:10AM
PSCG Registered Member #3792 Joined: Sun Mar 27 2011, 06:07PM
Location:
Posts: 136
Well, at least i know that reluctance coilguns have reached 6% efficiency (not sure for other projects). Take a look.
Back to top
JohnL
Thu Dec 29 2011, 12:45PM
JohnL Registered Member #3842 Joined: Thu Apr 21 2011, 12:19PM
Location:
Posts: 10
I had a good look at the 6% efficient coilgun, and there are two technical discrepancies. One is that "initially it fired a 30mm round at 27 m/s" on 47 J energy? and the only projectile that it described is a small nail. Also when I made the coil with barry's inductor sim and used the specs for an RLC circuit I got a pulse that goes on for over a second. Some of the specs (or my interpretation of them) could be wrong, but it seems very fishy to me.
Back to top
Saz43
Thu Dec 29 2011, 11:22PM
Saz43 Registered Member #1525 Joined: Mon Jun 09 2008, 12:16AM
Location: America
Posts: 294
That "PAR I" looked a little fishy to me too, but reluctance coilguns can get up to 15% efficiency for hobbyist designs, probably more if you tried hard enough. The trick is to use low voltage, enhanced flux linkage, proper switching/quenching, and multiple coil stages stages.

Multistage Low Voltage Coilgun
Enhanced Flux Linkage
Diode Commutation Modification

Coilgun Systems really is the authority on coilgun research!
Back to top
Steve Conner
Fri Dec 30 2011, 08:38AM
Steve Conner Registered Member #30 Joined: Fri Feb 03 2006, 10:52AM
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
Posts: 6706
What's the difference between a coilgun and a linear motor?

Efficiency tongue
Back to top
AndrewM
Wed Jan 04 2012, 05:25PM
AndrewM Registered Member #49 Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 04:05AM
Location: Bigass Pile of Penguins
Posts: 362
So if I was going to build an induction launcher (pancake, for example) with the goal of efficiency, I'd want a thick, highly conductive, projectile, no?
Back to top
Turkey9
Wed Jan 04 2012, 07:48PM
Turkey9 Registered Member #1451 Joined: Wed Apr 23 2008, 03:48AM
Location: Boulder, Co
Posts: 661
You'd want one that wasn't much thicker than the skin depth at the frequency of your pulse. You want to optimize velocity as the energy increases due to it's square, so a thicker projectile wouldn't help you out.
Back to top

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.