Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 35
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
One birthday today, congrats!
Alexandre (32)


Next birthdays
05/07 a.gutzeit (63)
05/08 wpk5008 (34)
05/09 Alfons (36)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: Tesla Coils
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

Necessity of toroidal cores in TCs?

Move Thread LAN_403
Dr. Shark
Sun Jun 04 2006, 03:31PM Print
Dr. Shark Registered Member #75 Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 09:30AM
Location: Montana, USA
Posts: 711
Pretty much every design of a DRSSTC uses ferrite toroids for the GDT as well as for current feedback. Now, I would not change a working design, but since I don't really have a lot of toroids, but all the more double-E cores, I wonder if these can be used or not. For example in a ATX power supply, both the GTD and the OCD transformers are double-E's, so why would they not be suitable for the same job in a DRSSTC? Sure they have a slighly higher leakage inductance, so one might argue that this could be a problem with the higher frequencys used in a TC. But is it really that bad? I have been using double-E's for GDTs in the past and they worked quited well, now I am trying to get a cascaded feedback current transformer done from E cores as well, but is seems to cause problems. I wonder if these problems are likely to come from somewhere else, or if using E-cores really is that bad.
Back to top
HV Enthusiast
Sun Jun 04 2006, 03:56PM
HV Enthusiast Registered Member #15 Joined: Thu Feb 02 2006, 01:11PM
Location:
Posts: 3068
You really can't say one core is better over another for a given application without knowing the specifications of the core, and the requirements for the design.

Although a toroidal core can yield a transformer which much higher coupling than one of an E-core, that gain in coupling may not be necessary for a given design. You need to look at all parameters when making a comparison.

An e-core if properly designed could work equally well for a GDT design. I think the biggest reason we use toroids in our GDTs is that they are simply easier to wind than that of an E-core.

Remember, just because something hasn't been done before (ie ecores over toroid cores) doesn't mean it can't work. Most of the things we do as amateurs in our hobby is due to ease and availability, not necessity. Winding e-cores can be a bitch, while toroids are simply easier to wind.
Back to top
Marko
Sun Jun 04 2006, 04:02PM
Marko Registered Member #89 Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 02:40PM
Location: Zadar, Croatia
Posts: 3145
My CT's are all such.
I use E cores from the filter chokes.

They are much harder to wind and hold together after that, but that's only disadvantage.
I also found out that it is very easy to damage enameled wire on sharp ferrite edges, and it's hard to protect the core fully.
Dipping in epoxy or using thinnest possible PVC insulated wire (I couldn't fit even closely enough turns with standard telephone wires, and ended using tiny wire out of computer mouse cable).

Maybe you could also use existing former to wind with enameled wire, or ewen use existing winding (I found some of such chokes having just about 33 turns smile ).
That could be good for CT's but I guess former would cause too low coupling for a GDT.

If it doesn't work CT's are probably shorted, or there is malfunction somewhere in electronics (you can try antenna there)
Back to top
Dr. Shark
Sun Jun 04 2006, 04:23PM
Dr. Shark Registered Member #75 Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 09:30AM
Location: Montana, USA
Posts: 711
Funny, I seem to be in the minority here. Given that you have a bobbin, which is always the case if you butcher a transfomer, I find it much easier to wind E cores. No threading through the hole, just go round and round.

Firkragg, you are probably right, my CT might have internal shorts. It is quite sloppily wound, and the wire has very thin enamel, so I better redo it.
Back to top
Marko
Sun Jun 04 2006, 04:51PM
Marko Registered Member #89 Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 02:40PM
Location: Zadar, Croatia
Posts: 3145
The 'bobbin' of the transformer could be a problem for a GDT since they love very tight coupling.
And I don't know if you could fit all the turns in there, but for CT's they are fine.

I wound my CT windings separately, dipped in urethane, core was taped and I still managed to damage the wire making one CT useless.

You should use PVC wire or maybe leave the bobbin with original winding.

I'm also in need of some real ferrite toroids, maybe a good sample from fairrite or somewhere.
Back to top
HV Enthusiast
Sun Jun 04 2006, 05:29PM
HV Enthusiast Registered Member #15 Joined: Thu Feb 02 2006, 01:11PM
Location:
Posts: 3068
CWS Bytemark sells ferrite tores for about $2.00 each.

Back to top
Steve Conner
Sun Jun 04 2006, 10:00PM
Steve Conner Registered Member #30 Joined: Fri Feb 03 2006, 10:52AM
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
Posts: 6706
I made an E-I core GDT, and it worked fine at all the frequencies I tried it at, up to 250kHz. As long as you use the multifilar winding technique, I think the coupling is fine. I twisted 5 wires together into a bundle and then wound that round the centre leg of the "E".

I think toroid cores are somewhat nicer for CTs though, they seem easier to Faraday shield. Now I use toroid cores made of Fair-rite type 78 material for just about everything, since I can get them for about $2-$3 each. Instead of using hundreds of turns on CTs, or cascades, I tend to use 30 to 100 turns and just use a smaller burden resistance.
Back to top
Marko
Sun Jun 04 2006, 10:04PM
Marko Registered Member #89 Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 02:40PM
Location: Zadar, Croatia
Posts: 3145
I did the same, but with even more wires. I used 15 thinner wires and bundled them together with a lego motor. Then I used 3 togeher as single wire.
I don't kno wif this was necessary but coupling couldn't be better.

Back to top

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.