Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 21
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
One birthday today, congrats!
GrantX (34)


Next birthdays
03/30 Adam Horden (39)
03/30 Mr.Warwickshire (23)
03/31 Swedish Coiler (41)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: Electromagnetic Projectile Accelerators
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

Going to build a Coilgun

Move Thread LAN_403
Sonny
Sun Mar 12 2006, 08:11PM
Sonny Registered Member #310 Joined: Sun Mar 12 2006, 07:37PM
Location:
Posts: 9
Hello, i'm from Sweden and i'm a new user to this forum and site. Great one =)

I got a projectwork to do so i decide to go for a coilgun. I'm awaiting 10, 400V 3900uF capacitors which i think will arrive next week. I decide for using five coils in this one (bought 10 capacitor for future plans =)). The biggest problem i got is that i don't realy know how large current i can discharge from my capacitors yet, any ideas? I was thinking about 100-150A for 5ms at most.

Ordered some "IRG4PH50U" IGBTs from Digikey earlyer this week but i dunno if they are on vacation now. When i was using the coil calculator on the "magnetic gun club" i notic a performance increas with the AWG22 wire instead of using autocalculation (AWG24 wire). The other specs was: 390V, 120A, 11mm diameter, 25mm lenght and .1 ohm external resistance.

I'll post some pics when i star working on this project.
Back to top
...
Sun Mar 12 2006, 09:49PM
... Registered Member #56 Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 05:02AM
Location: Southern Califorina, USA
Posts: 2445
the max current you can discharge from a capacitor is governed by the circuit's resistance/inductance drop. If you are calculating it stick just with the resistance of the coil to determine the amount of current your switch needs to be rated for.
The absolute max you can draw is governed by the caps internal resistance/voltage it is charged to. I would say yours are about .005ohms, so you at 400v could get (voltage[volts]=current[amps]*resistance[ohms]) 80ka out of them, but that would probably damage the cap. I would suggest you keep it under 1ka per cap.
How long you could draw that current for is limited by the amount of energy stored it the cap, generally expressed in Joules (J=.5*capacitance[farads]*voltage[volts]^2). So each cap has about 300J. Determining how long a pulse you can get is a little trickier, because as you use energy from the cap the voltage drops, so the current drops, etc. For a given resistance you would take
seconds[milliseconds]=resistance[ohms] *capacitance[millifarads]*ln(initial voltage[volts]/final voltage[volts]). So if you wanted to keep the cap voltage above 200v, with a 3.9mf cap, a 1ohm coil and an initial voltage of 400v you would get about 2.7ms. Don't take that number too seriously because it does not take the highly inductive nature of the coil into account, but it will give you an idea of how long (the actual result will be longer)

Using larger wire increases the performance because it lowers the resistance of the coil, which wastes less energy so you get higher efficiencies.

good luck!
Back to top
Sonny
Mon Mar 13 2006, 02:30AM
Sonny Registered Member #310 Joined: Sun Mar 12 2006, 07:37PM
Location:
Posts: 9
... wrote ...

the max current you can discharge from a capacitor is governed by the circuit's resistance/inductance drop. If you are calculating it stick just with the resistance of the coil to determine the amount of current your switch needs to be rated for.
The absolute max you can draw is governed by the caps internal resistance/voltage it is charged to. I would say yours are about .005ohms, so you at 400v could get (voltage[volts]=current[amps]*resistance[ohms]) 80ka out of them, but that would probably damage the cap. I would suggest you keep it under 1ka per cap.
How long you could draw that current for is limited by the amount of energy stored it the cap, generally expressed in Joules (J=.5*capacitance[farads]*voltage[volts]^2). So each cap has about 300J. Determining how long a pulse you can get is a little trickier, because as you use energy from the cap the voltage drops, so the current drops, etc. For a given resistance you would take
seconds[milliseconds]=resistance[ohms] *capacitance[millifarads]*ln(initial voltage[volts]/final voltage[volts]). So if you wanted to keep the cap voltage above 200v, with a 3.9mf cap, a 1ohm coil and an initial voltage of 400v you would get about 2.7ms. Don't take that number too seriously because it does not take the highly inductive nature of the coil into account, but it will give you an idea of how long (the actual result will be longer)

Using larger wire increases the performance because it lowers the resistance of the coil, which wastes less energy so you get higher efficiencies.

good luck!

Okej, thanks for the help. The IGBTs can only hadle 180A peek current so maybe i should get some other or go for two or three IGBTs per coil to get the maximum out of the capacitors. Stupid to wast enegy left in the capacitors =P

Wonder if my MOSFET/IGBT-drivers can handle three transistors (it's an "IR2121" Link2 )
Back to top
Yohan
Mon Mar 13 2006, 08:58PM
Yohan Registered Member #194 Joined: Fri Feb 17 2006, 07:52PM
Location:
Posts: 19
or go for two or three IGBTs per coil to get the maximum
Careful. IGBT's in parallel will not share the current load equally. I'd be willing to bet that you'll end up with two or three paper weights after your first trial. However, MOSFETS in parallel will divide the current equally! But, finding sufficient current ratings among MOSFETS can get very expensive very quick.
Back to top
Sonny
Tue Apr 04 2006, 11:42AM
Sonny Registered Member #310 Joined: Sun Mar 12 2006, 07:37PM
Location:
Posts: 9
Okey. Have been testing the IGBT switches on a 2.5 ohms coil now and it doesn't look to well. 4 of my IGBTs ( Link2 ) have stoped working though they have not exploded. And this was only at ~300V. Those IGBT are missing an internal diode so i thought to solder a diode ( Link2 ) over the drain-source would do the trick but it didn't. Maybe that diod is to slow? I also got 3 of that type over the coil.

I'm now considering to buy some FETs instead but it's a quite expensive way. Anyone of you coilgun-builders have any good FETs to recommend? Think i have foun two that could be a better idea then my IGBTs.

Link2 or
Link2
Back to top
EN
Tue Apr 04 2006, 01:52PM
EN Registered Member #85 Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 01:22PM
Location:
Posts: 21
Actually, you can parallel IGBTs quite successfully, provided that you have IGBTs with a positive temperature coefficent, which i believe the 3rd generation or NPT or whatever IGBTs have.

Mosfets are quite expensive for high current and voltage and have a rather high resistance. So they wouldnt be my first choice.

The diodes across the coil being too slow isnt the reason why the igbts died, as the turn on speed of diodes is extremely fast, even on slow diodes.

Did you have zener diodes from the gate to the source? I think there is a strange effect that when switching high current in IGBTs, the gate raises its voltage above what is applied, and without zener diodes the gate may be overvolted, resulting in fuxxoring the igbt.
Back to top
Sonny
Tue Apr 04 2006, 02:32PM
Sonny Registered Member #310 Joined: Sun Mar 12 2006, 07:37PM
Location:
Posts: 9
No, i don't have any zener diodes from gate to source. It's the 4th generations IGBTs so i'll try paralell some later. What voltage should i get on my zeners? I'm triggering them with 9V from a 555-timer.
Back to top
EN
Tue Apr 04 2006, 09:10PM
EN Registered Member #85 Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 01:22PM
Location:
Posts: 21
I would use a zener diode with a voltage higher than your gate driving voltage but lower than the voltage at which the gate breaks down. so anything between 9V and 30V (perhaps more).

Just by the way, 9V is on the low side when switching high current. you want to make sure that the igbt stays in stauration so I would recommend using higher voltage (like 15V or even more, but not much more than 30V)
Next step would be to think about switching the gate to -15V for turn off so that it can switch off with less losses.
Back to top
Sonny
Tue Apr 04 2006, 09:44PM
Sonny Registered Member #310 Joined: Sun Mar 12 2006, 07:37PM
Location:
Posts: 9
Okey, thanks for the info. The -15v part can be a little hard i guess. I got the 555-timer and a gate-driver Link2 to play with for each coil. I'm aiming for a battery driven coilgun with a Li-Polymer battery pack. 4 of those cells will give me 14.8V to play with.

I have been testing my 2.5 ohms coil with two FETs rated at 300V 160A peak current each with no problems at all (70+ shots) even tried to charge the capacitors to 315V with no FET break down. Think i'll order some of one of the FETs i meanshend (spelling?) in one of the earlier posts.

EDIT: Can i use those Link2 ? Was thinking that the zerner diodes between gate and source maybe will blow when this large current rushing through the FET?
Back to top

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.