Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 30
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
One birthday today, congrats!
uzzors2k (35)


Next birthdays
03/29 GrantX (34)
03/30 Adam Horden (39)
03/30 Mr.Warwickshire (23)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: General Chatting
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

Anyone else here have a hard time watching mythbusters?

1 2 3 4  last
Move Thread LAN_403
ConKbot of Doom
Thu Feb 21 2008, 09:25PM Print
ConKbot of Doom Registered Member #509 Joined: Sat Feb 10 2007, 07:02AM
Location:
Posts: 329
I can watch mythbusters just fine, I just don't make it very pleasant for others, I find their science not quite scientific enough...

Their testing of propane cylinders to see if they could make them explode, involved firearms of increasing power to find what would penetrate, unfortunately their idea of a step was 9mm to 30-06 armor piercing. Not exactly a small step.

On the episode about the exploding pants they were nitrating denim, and they just showed a quick swipe of the cloth though the solution, and then wondered why it didn't explode when they held a lighter up to it. Later when they tried to nitrate a whole pair of jeans into guncotton, they had a 1 gallon glass container full of the acids and just threw the pair of jeans in. Whole time I was thinking "they aren't gonna just do that are they? They have to know better..." But they did, and sure enough tons of lovely red fumes and cracked glass from the heat.

I haven't done any nitrations myself, but on every site referring how to, they always caution to keep the quantities small or risk a runaway... even the some of the crappy and pretty shady looking sites mention the need to cool larger batches.



Also, the episode on the salami rocket motor. where the meter they used to measure impulse would only measure peak, and then half way though the experiment they decide to throw on a different nozzle(Nice scientific method... *sigh*) which was blowing off on every trial, undoubtedly hitting the meter and causing a high peak...

Future weapons gets me going to but I can usually bite my tongue on that for the most part. Anyone else feel similar?
Back to top
Coronafix
Thu Feb 21 2008, 09:39PM
Coronafix Registered Member #160 Joined: Mon Feb 13 2006, 02:07AM
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 938
Yes!! Mythbusters used to do my head in, they're idea of "scientific testing" is laughable at best.
Now, I just don't watch TV, but if I do catch it at the odd time, I realize that it's just a bit of fluff
and not to take it seriously. We can be too serious sometimes.
Back to top
Kizmo
Thu Feb 21 2008, 10:27PM
Kizmo Registered Member #599 Joined: Thu Mar 22 2007, 07:40PM
Location: Northern Finland, Rovaniemi
Posts: 624
Its just television entertainment and it should be viewed like one.

I think part of this 'problem' is that they must do tens and tens of experiments and that means quite many hours of raw video material. And when someone (guy who maybe doesn't know a thing about science) cuts them and makes hour long episode, there will be continuity errors. Many shows suffer from this, like TopGear. I personally don't mind or even notice most of these things but i know they are present.
Back to top
Ragnarok
Thu Feb 21 2008, 11:49PM
Ragnarok Registered Member #659 Joined: Fri Apr 20 2007, 09:14AM
Location: SW Hertfordshire, UK
Posts: 75
Yes, I can seldom watch such a programme like that without adding my own commentary - a lot of the time I'm actually seriously annoyed at the people for making basic errors.

Also, as you mentioned, their "steps" in experiments are very large. It goes from reasonable parameters to just ridiculous in one go:
"Oh, 100 grams of such explosive didn't work. Lets add several kilos and try again."

Nor can I watch a film without seeing continuity errors, plot holes or mistakes they've made.

I'm just that kind of person.

Back to top
Hazmatt_(The Underdog)
Fri Feb 22 2008, 04:06AM
Hazmatt_(The Underdog) Registered Member #135 Joined: Sat Feb 11 2006, 12:06AM
Location: Anywhere is fine
Posts: 1735
You guys do know they take viewer mail. Just send in your gripes!
Back to top
rp181
Fri Feb 22 2008, 04:09AM
rp181 Registered Member #1062 Joined: Tue Oct 16 2007, 02:01AM
Location:
Posts: 1529
I think they dont care about the scientif process as much, there more intrested in making it interesting for the majority of people.
Back to top
Backyard Skunkworks
Fri Feb 22 2008, 06:35AM
Backyard Skunkworks Registered Member #1262 Joined: Fri Jan 25 2008, 05:22AM
Location: Maryland, USA
Posts: 451
Well the Mythbusters do manage to screw up a fair amount of stuff, however it never really effects the overall outcome of most stories. They might get something totally wrong (like saying 6mA is fatal or risking thier lives with nitric acid) however it always seems to turn out the same regardless. I do think they are FAR less then scientific at times however atleast they try and hit the mark a fair amount. Overall I'd say we should be glad that theres a show thats even SOMEWHAT scientific on TV these days. Cut Adam and Jamie some slack, they do a damn good job of making science interesting!

Too bad they didn't use cesium on episode 100, that might have given a nicer bang.

A ton more screw ups of theirs would come to mind if it wernt 1am...

And don't get me started on the Hydroflouric acid in the tub scene on Breaking Bad episode #2, why they didn't opt for the more believeable Sodium or Potassium hydroxide is beyond me...
Back to top
Wolfram
Fri Feb 22 2008, 07:16AM
Wolfram Registered Member #33 Joined: Sat Feb 04 2006, 01:31PM
Location: Norway
Posts: 971
Backyard Skunkworks wrote ...

Too bad they didn't use cesium on episode 100, that might have given a nicer bang.

Cesium is not as spectacular as most people seem to think: Link2
Back to top
Tesladownunder
Fri Feb 22 2008, 10:54AM
Tesladownunder Registered Member #10 Joined: Thu Feb 02 2006, 09:45AM
Location: Bunbury, Australia
Posts: 1424
Just a little word from the other side...
Nothing appeals less to Joe Public than a dry reproduction of a scientific experiment by a man in a white coat in which some small thing gets done and a nice graph is generated.

The whole theatrical process is why MythBusters is successful. I've only ever watched 2 or 3 episodes myself but the formula is there.
Ask a simple question, throw in an element of danger and unpredictability and have things go wrong. Have some charismatic crazy personalities. Have a big bang ending that answers the question. Have some real science but don't let it get in the way of the fun.

I have been considering just how to adopt some of these principles to my stuff. My first proposal to Discovery USA from Creative Differences was rejected for some of those reasons.

I was a bit taken aback by some of the safety aspects - but people probably say the same about mine. Some of the science was dodgy too - as it was on a couple of mine due to the narrators assumptions which I didn't have control over.

TDU
Back to top
HV Enthusiast
Fri Feb 22 2008, 11:01AM
HV Enthusiast Registered Member #15 Joined: Thu Feb 02 2006, 01:11PM
Location:
Posts: 3068
Who cares about the science . . .

I only watch for one reason - Kari
Back to top
1 2 3 4  last

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.