If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.
Special Thanks To:
Aaron Holmes
Aaron Wheeler
Adam Horden
Alan Scrimgeour
Andre
Andrew Haynes
Anonymous000
asabase
Austin Weil
barney
Barry
Bert Hickman
Bill Kukowski
Blitzorn
Brandon Paradelas
Bruce Bowling
BubeeMike
Byong Park
Cesiumsponge
Chris F.
Chris Hooper
Corey Worthington
Derek Woodroffe
Dalus
Dan Strother
Daniel Davis
Daniel Uhrenholt
datasheetarchive
Dave Billington
Dave Marshall
David F.
Dennis Rogers
drelectrix
Dr. John Gudenas
Dr. Spark
E.TexasTesla
eastvoltresearch
Eirik Taylor
Erik Dyakov
Erlend^SE
Finn Hammer
Firebug24k
GalliumMan
Gary Peterson
George Slade
GhostNull
Gordon Mcknight
Graham Armitage
Grant
GreySoul
Henry H
IamSmooth
In memory of Leo Powning
Jacob Cash
James Howells
James Pawson
Jeff Greenfield
Jeff Thomas
Jesse Frost
Jim Mitchell
jlr134
Joe Mastroianni
John Forcina
John Oberg
John Willcutt
Jon Newcomb
klugesmith
Leslie Wright
Lutz Hoffman
Mads Barnkob
Martin King
Mats Karlsson
Matt Gibson
Matthew Guidry
mbd
Michael D'Angelo
Mikkel
mileswaldron
mister_rf
Neil Foster
Nick de Smith
Nick Soroka
nicklenorp
Nik
Norman Stanley
Patrick Coleman
Paul Brodie
Paul Jordan
Paul Montgomery
Ped
Peter Krogen
Peter Terren
PhilGood
Richard Feldman
Robert Bush
Royce Bailey
Scott Fusare
Scott Newman
smiffy
Stella
Steven Busic
Steve Conner
Steve Jones
Steve Ward
Sulaiman
Thomas Coyle
Thomas A. Wallace
Thomas W
Timo
Torch
Ulf Jonsson
vasil
Vaxian
vladi mazzilli
wastehl
Weston
William Kim
William N.
William Stehl
Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Registered Member #61373
Joined: Sat Dec 17 2016, 01:45PM
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 87
I am planning to add 2 Mots to my dual Mot stack, Hv connected in parallel. The 2 new ones are from 2 different microwaves, and are slightly different in size. The 2 new Mots are almost as large as the Mots I have now.
With resonant caps, do the caps have to have identical specs too (uF)? What will happen if one cap is .85uF and the other is .75uF?
Registered Member #72
Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 08:29AM
Location: UK St. Albans
Posts: 1659
Sounds like you're gathering together all the elements for a mourning family.
Post a schematic of what you have now, specs for what you think it does now, what you want it to do, and a schematic of how you're intending to modify it.
Registered Member #162
Joined: Mon Feb 13 2006, 10:25AM
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 3140
Whenever you put similar but not identical transformers in parallel there are two main situations to consider; . on load, each primary voltage will be greater than the load voltage so will contribute a current of (Vsec - Vload)/(secondary impedance) each. so the lower voltage and/or higher impedance transformers of the group will supply less current each to the load than the higher voltage and/or lower impedance transformers . off load, due to slightly dissimilar secondary voltages, one or more secondaries will be above the common voltage, and one or more below it so one or more transformers will be 'sourcing' current and one or more will be 'sinking' current. MOTs have effectively high output impedances so the circulating currents will be smaller than full load currents, so no problem. Normal transformers with no deliberate flux leakage paths (or MOTs with the shunts knocked out) have a low output impedance, so the circulating currents in mis-matched transformers could easily exceed rated currents.
I consider ONE MOT to be potentially LETHAL four in parallel just makes your corpse smoke quicker
P.S. How are you going to power the four MOTs in parallel ? can your a.c. supply provide the required power ?
Registered Member #61373
Joined: Sat Dec 17 2016, 01:45PM
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 87
Dr. Slack wrote ...
Post a schematic of what you have now, specs for what you think it does now, what you want it to do, and a schematic of how you're intending to modify it.
What I have now, 2.8kVAC 2.7A:
How I'm going to modify it, 2.8kVAC 5.4A:
I'm using induction values as an example. I don't know the exact inductance. My mots are identical now, but the 2 newbies are slightly different in size, and a different brand. They should both be in the range of 2,100 - 2,200v
Sulaiman wrote ...
P.S. How are you going to power the four MOTs in parallel ? can your a.c. supply provide the required power ?
I have 2 outlets, both adjacent and connected to separate fuses. One outlet can supply 2 MOTs (resonant config. only) without blowing the 30A fuse.
Registered Member #102
Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 08:15PM
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 169
What you have appears to be something that will generally work. However, I cannot fathom what you could possibly want to do with all that current. I agree with Sulaiman here: you are creating something far past what is considered to be lethal.
Registered Member #2906
Joined: Sun Jun 06 2010, 02:20AM
Location: Dresden, Germany
Posts: 727
Stop whining about safety, 4 mots arent more dangerous than 1 alone if mishandled. More important is, that his simulation lacks the coupling factor statement. It feels like this config will have strange load dependent behavior. Try to actually simulate it (like to share the .asc?)
ScottH, what you are trying here can spell out to be disastrous.
Sulaiman wrote:
MOTs have effectively high output impedances so the circulating currents will be smaller than full load currents, so no problem.
This is generally correct, but by adding caps in series, the leakage inductance might be cancelled, which can lead to large currents between the transformers and consequently very high voltages due to resonance conditions. For an unlucky choice of caps and transformers, the whole thing can blow up spectacularly.
Registered Member #72
Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 08:29AM
Location: UK St. Albans
Posts: 1659
Uspring wrote:
Omit the caps and you are much safer. Relatively.
So if Scott wanted to avoid the possibility of cancelling out the shunt-enhanced leakage inductance that would otherwise protect his parallel MOTs, he should parallel the MOTs directly. Then if he wanted to play with the resonant caps, add a parallel connection of them between the load and the commoned MOT HV terminal? Just a thought. Not as good a thought as putting the MOTs back in the box and having a cup of tea instead, but a thought.
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.