Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 56
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
All today's birthdays', congrats!
Bead (41)
Fumeaux (25)


Next birthdays
04/28 Steve Conner (46)
04/29 GODSFUSION (37)
04/29 Zajcek (37)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: General Science and Electronics
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

When wiring 4 MOTs in parallel, do the specs have to be identical?

1 2 3 
Move Thread LAN_403
ScottH
Tue May 09 2017, 12:25AM Print
ScottH Registered Member #61373 Joined: Sat Dec 17 2016, 01:45PM
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 87
I am planning to add 2 Mots to my dual Mot stack, Hv connected in parallel. The 2 new ones are from 2 different microwaves, and are slightly different in size. The 2 new Mots are almost as large as the Mots I have now.

With resonant caps, do the caps have to have identical specs too (uF)? What will happen if one cap is .85uF and the other is .75uF?
Back to top
Dr. Slack
Tue May 09 2017, 05:03AM
Dr. Slack Registered Member #72 Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 08:29AM
Location: UK St. Albans
Posts: 1659
Sounds like you're gathering together all the elements for a mourning family.

Post a schematic of what you have now, specs for what you think it does now, what you want it to do, and a schematic of how you're intending to modify it.
Back to top
Sulaiman
Tue May 09 2017, 08:43AM
Sulaiman Registered Member #162 Joined: Mon Feb 13 2006, 10:25AM
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 3140
Whenever you put similar but not identical transformers in parallel there are two main situations to consider;
. on load,
each primary voltage will be greater than the load voltage so will contribute a current of (Vsec - Vload)/(secondary impedance) each.
so the lower voltage and/or higher impedance transformers of the group will supply less current each to the load than the higher voltage and/or lower impedance transformers
. off load,
due to slightly dissimilar secondary voltages, one or more secondaries will be above the common voltage, and one or more below it
so one or more transformers will be 'sourcing' current and one or more will be 'sinking' current.
MOTs have effectively high output impedances so the circulating currents will be smaller than full load currents,
so no problem.
Normal transformers with no deliberate flux leakage paths (or MOTs with the shunts knocked out) have a low output impedance,
so the circulating currents in mis-matched transformers could easily exceed rated currents.

I consider ONE MOT to be potentially LETHAL
four in parallel just makes your corpse smoke quicker cheesey

P.S. How are you going to power the four MOTs in parallel ?
can your a.c. supply provide the required power ?
Back to top
ScottH
Thu May 11 2017, 11:50PM
ScottH Registered Member #61373 Joined: Sat Dec 17 2016, 01:45PM
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 87
Dr. Slack wrote ...

Post a schematic of what you have now, specs for what you think it does now, what you want it to do, and a schematic of how you're intending to modify it.

What I have now, 2.8kVAC 2.7A:


1494546101 61373 FT179730 Mot 600x600


How I'm going to modify it, 2.8kVAC 5.4A:

1494546134 61373 FT179730 Mots 600x600


I'm using induction values as an example. I don't know the exact inductance. My mots are identical now, but the 2 newbies are slightly different in size, and a different brand. They should both be in the range of 2,100 - 2,200v

Sulaiman wrote ...

P.S. How are you going to power the four MOTs in parallel ?
can your a.c. supply provide the required power ?

I have 2 outlets, both adjacent and connected to separate fuses. One outlet can supply 2 MOTs (resonant config. only) without blowing the 30A fuse.
Back to top
teravolt
Fri May 12 2017, 02:45AM
teravolt Registered Member #195 Joined: Fri Feb 17 2006, 08:27PM
Location: Berkeley, ca.
Posts: 1111
you could phase 1/2 the transformers and get 4kv. so you would have a 4kv with a grounded center tap like neon sign transformer
Back to top
Kolas
Fri May 12 2017, 02:49AM
Kolas Registered Member #102 Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 08:15PM
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 169
What you have appears to be something that will generally work. However, I cannot fathom what you could possibly want to do with all that current.
I agree with Sulaiman here: you are creating something far past what is considered to be lethal.
Back to top
DerAlbi
Fri May 12 2017, 04:38AM
DerAlbi Registered Member #2906 Joined: Sun Jun 06 2010, 02:20AM
Location: Dresden, Germany
Posts: 727
Stop whining about safety, 4 mots arent more dangerous than 1 alone if mishandled.
More important is, that his simulation lacks the coupling factor statement. It feels like this config will have strange load dependent behavior. Try to actually simulate it (like to share the .asc?)
Back to top
Uspring
Fri May 12 2017, 08:48AM
Uspring Registered Member #3988 Joined: Thu Jul 07 2011, 03:25PM
Location:
Posts: 711
ScottH, what you are trying here can spell out to be disastrous.

Sulaiman wrote:
MOTs have effectively high output impedances so the circulating currents will be smaller than full load currents,
so no problem.
This is generally correct, but by adding caps in series, the leakage inductance might be cancelled, which can lead to large currents between the transformers and consequently very high voltages due to resonance conditions. For an unlucky choice of caps and transformers, the whole thing can blow up spectacularly.

Omit the caps and you are much safer. Relatively.

Back to top
Dr. Slack
Fri May 12 2017, 01:59PM
Dr. Slack Registered Member #72 Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 08:29AM
Location: UK St. Albans
Posts: 1659
Uspring wrote:
Omit the caps and you are much safer. Relatively.

So if Scott wanted to avoid the possibility of cancelling out the shunt-enhanced leakage inductance that would otherwise protect his parallel MOTs, he should parallel the MOTs directly. Then if he wanted to play with the resonant caps, add a parallel connection of them between the load and the commoned MOT HV terminal? Just a thought. Not as good a thought as putting the MOTs back in the box and having a cup of tea instead, but a thought.
Back to top
Sulaiman
Fri May 12 2017, 02:37PM
Sulaiman Registered Member #162 Joined: Mon Feb 13 2006, 10:25AM
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 3140
ScottH wrote ...


Sulaiman wrote ...

P.S. How are you going to power the four MOTs in parallel ?
can your a.c. supply provide the required power ?

I have 2 outlets, both adjacent and connected to separate fuses. One outlet can supply 2 MOTs (resonant config. only) without blowing the 30A fuse.

I asked the questions that way because I'd anticipated your answer and wanted to see if you are learning to think safety yet .......

You do realise the potential hazard when you unplug one of the two circuits ?
Back to top
1 2 3 

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.