Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 20
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
All today's birthdays', congrats!
Desmogod (48)
Alex Smith (31)


Next birthdays
04/26 Bead (41)
04/26 Fumeaux (25)
04/28 Steve Conner (46)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: General Chatting
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

The problem with dangerous chemicals

1 2 
Move Thread LAN_403
Conundrum
Mon Apr 24 2017, 07:16PM Print
Conundrum Registered Member #96 Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 05:37PM
Location: CI, Earth
Posts: 4059
Hi all.

Given recent events, the issue has been raised of dangerous chemicals (eg sulphuric acid, drain cleaner, lye etc) being available to the general public without restriction.

Should we consider a blanket ban on purchasing these, for anyone who cannot prove that their intended application is safe, and/or anyone who cannot demonstrate via relevant qualification the knowledge to handle them safely
For that matter, should lead acid batteries of the flooded type be modified to prevent recovery of the acid (eg glass beads etc) and the older variety removed from sale as these are often how potential criminals get hold of acid for other mischief such as bio-diesel production and illegal fuel laundering in the first place.

I for one would hate to see chemistry hobbyists punished further, but when the outcome of even a minor exposure can have lifelong effects should we err on the side of caution?

Discuss.
Back to top
2Spoons
Mon Apr 24 2017, 10:40PM
2Spoons Registered Member #2939 Joined: Fri Jun 25 2010, 04:25AM
Location:
Posts: 615
If someone has a desire to hurt other people, they will find a way - no matter how hard you try to take away all the "dangerous" things. Look at the recent attacks using vehicles as weapons. Are you going to ban kitchen knives next, except for trained chefs?
I think the only place bans and controls should be exercised is for things that are actually intended as weapons - eg guns, and explosives.
Back to top
Sulaiman
Tue Apr 25 2017, 12:33AM
Sulaiman Registered Member #162 Joined: Mon Feb 13 2006, 10:25AM
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 3140
I can't imagine criminals having to use battery acid in UK,
96% sulphuric acid has been very easy to buy ... until recently.
My local hardware shops no longer stock it,
even eBay stopped for a while, back on sale now,
Amazon.uk has had sulfuric acid continuously available.

With sulphuric acid I can synthesise most other acids,
so the loss of this resource would be significant to me as a hobby chemist.

Sulfuric acid is one of the largest-volume industrial chemicals produced in the world. Link2
so absolute control would be difficult.

OTOH sulphuric acid is easily used as a very nasty weapon,
but so are laundry bleaches and bricks.

Rather than banning stuff, proper education and if that fails, punishment, is better.
e.g. if folk know that gbh via acid is 10 years minimum, there will be very few acid attacks.
Back to top
Hazmatt_(The Underdog)
Tue Apr 25 2017, 01:17AM
Hazmatt_(The Underdog) Registered Member #135 Joined: Sat Feb 11 2006, 12:06AM
Location: Anywhere is fine
Posts: 1735
BOLLOCKS!

I spent a lot of time thinking of legitimate reasons for chemicals when I needed them.

Drain cleaner (which is really line cleaner) For the line! its that obvious!

Lye.. you have some hard to remove grease stains on your concrete... just as easy an excuse.

Bucket of pool bleach tablets.. so you own a pool... and you're not secretly making perchlorates.

It's that easy.

And if you want to get the good stuff, all you need to do is file for a business license, and you can buy anything, at least that's the way it is here in the states.
Back to top
Sulaiman
Tue Apr 25 2017, 04:05AM
Sulaiman Registered Member #162 Joined: Mon Feb 13 2006, 10:25AM
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 3140
a quick google earth view will show that I use pool tablets for other purposes ;)
Back to top
Carbon_Rod
Tue Apr 25 2017, 05:18AM
Carbon_Rod Registered Member #65 Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 06:43AM
Location:
Posts: 1155
We use quite a bit of sodium hydroxide as metal cleaner, and Xylene in manufacturing.
If your buy over 1 kg, than your driver license is recorded at the shop... so police can theoretically identify individuals amassing large quantities. Almost no retailers will carry laboratory grade chemicals anymore, as most industrial processes have simply been moved to developing countries.

H2O in pools harms more people every year than fools attempting to create elicit substances. However, the consumer culture combined with a well known psychological phenomena... makes the idea of controlling that which people don't understand desirable.
Link2

The fact that successful civilizations are a group of individuals that choose to forgo unenlightened self-interest escapes sociopaths. Unfortunately, chemistry as a hobby is now considered taboo by those that see no immediate benefit from an unpackaged product with no predefined context of usage:
Link2

Sociologically speaking, science has traditionally been marginalized given it exposes the hypocrisy of those that violate the very core of what defines commonsense. We are living in an age where modern witch-hunts help marginalized people feel safer, but idealized ignorance ultimately ensures a caste separation of indentured consumers and wealthy meritocrats.
wink
Back to top
Conundrum
Tue Apr 25 2017, 06:43AM
Conundrum Registered Member #96 Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 05:37PM
Location: CI, Earth
Posts: 4059
Perhaps a token gesture, to require an up to date passport before handing over anything dangerous. Also proof of at least basic chemical safety (hint: if you are buying lye and do not have proper safety goggles and gloves, you probably don't)
Minor change but it would help discourage idiots and keep everyone that bit safer.
Back to top
dexter
Tue Apr 25 2017, 08:47AM
dexter Registered Member #42796 Joined: Mon Jan 13 2014, 06:34PM
Location:
Posts: 195
Conundrum wrote ...

Perhaps a token gesture, to require an up to date passport before handing over anything dangerous. Also proof of at least basic chemical safety (hint: if you are buying lye and do not have proper safety goggles and gloves, you probably don't)
Minor change but it would help discourage idiots and keep everyone that bit safer.

safety instructions on the package are more than enough so no need for a nanny state
Back to top
Dr. Slack
Tue Apr 25 2017, 09:07AM
Dr. Slack Registered Member #72 Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 08:29AM
Location: UK St. Albans
Posts: 1659
dexter wrote ...

safety instructions on the package are more than enough so no need for a nanny state

You'd think so, wouldn't you? I had some 99% sulphuric, and a colleague at work wanted a little to play with (amateur chemist, experienced electronic engineer, degree, knew how many beans made 5). So I took it into work and decanted some into a dry bottle he'd brought in.

He turned up the next day looking very sheepish, showed me the charred and holed bottle, and explained how he'd fortunately avoided personal injury or significant property damage. 99% sulphuric rots slowly through PET, slow enough that we didn't notice it on decanting.

It says 'keep in original container' on the container, which was polythene. Two people who should know better didn't think hard enough about the different susceptibility of different plastics.
Back to top
Conundrum
Tue Apr 25 2017, 07:34PM
Conundrum Registered Member #96 Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 05:37PM
Location: CI, Earth
Posts: 4059
<soapbox>
I point out that the folks attacked recently, two lost eyes and the others have serious scarring.
No amount of reconstructive surgery can repair this, in India its a real problem that unfortunately is complicated by
artisanal gold mining often from illegally imported e-waste from Europe and elsewhere sent over in bulk in total defiance
of the Basel convention with the residual heavy metals ending up in rivers and slowly poisoning folks.

Apparently the damage is serious enough that the ruined eye(s) had to be removed completely to prevent the
unaffected eyes also losing sight due to some sort of immune reaction,

Please consider that sending your recovered gold off to a professional company for processing and/or PCB manufacturing
is a lot safer than trying to save a few $$$ and ending up with a Superfund site.

</soapbox>
Back to top
1 2 

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.