Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 59
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
All today's birthdays', congrats!
Bead (41)
Fumeaux (25)


Next birthdays
04/28 Steve Conner (46)
04/29 GODSFUSION (37)
04/29 Zajcek (37)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: Electromagnetic Radiation
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

Tuning a QFH antenna by measuring return loss

Move Thread LAN_403
uzzors2k
Mon Feb 13 2017, 06:20PM
uzzors2k Registered Member #95 Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 04:57PM
Location: Norway
Posts: 1308
I was wondering how one should go about tuning a QFH antenna by measuring it's return loss. Has anyone attempted this? I have this idea that if I move the two resonance points closer together, I'll increase the gain at the main reception frequency. This doesn't appear to be the case, but how does it affect the polarization? Will I lose circular polarization by doing this?

In the plots below I've shortened the larger loop, and eventually the smaller loop to raise the resonance frequency of each. The results are shown in three steps. Judging by the plots I've only reduced the antennas ability to receive around 120MHz.

The one plot is mislabeled by the way.

0

2

3
Back to top
johnf
Mon Feb 13 2017, 06:54PM
johnf Registered Member #230 Joined: Tue Feb 21 2006, 08:01PM
Location: Gracefield lower Hutt
Posts: 284
Antenna gain is not the same as mismatch loss.
You have increased the Q of your antenna this does not mean more gain
however your antenna mod helps remove out of band signals
Back to top
Hazmatt_(The Underdog)
Tue Feb 14 2017, 03:16AM
Hazmatt_(The Underdog) Registered Member #135 Joined: Sat Feb 11 2006, 12:06AM
Location: Anywhere is fine
Posts: 1735
If you can get a directional coupler you can measure your return loss.

In the forward direction you measure your forward power, reversed is return loss.

A simple 20dB directional coupler is a 10:1 ratio (basically a CT), and with two cores or a binocular core you can make a dual directional coupler to measure fwd and reverse power at the same time, and possibly calculate your VSWR.

Or you could just buy a dual directional coupler from Minicircuits. They have a lot of neat parts.
Back to top
WaveRider
Tue Feb 14 2017, 04:13PM
WaveRider Registered Member #29 Joined: Fri Feb 03 2006, 09:00AM
Location: Hasselt, Belgium
Posts: 500
You can tune the return loss by varying the relative size of the two loops, but be aware that the loop sizes are such that you get the proper phasing for circular polarization. (This is much like the "nearly square" method of generating circular polarization in microstrip patch antennas.) One loop is slightly below resonance and the other slightly above, to get the 90 degree phase shift between the loops.

I guess you are trying to build an antenna for the 137.5 MHz weather satellite facsimile downlink. There are many examples of these antennas out there in Google-land, as you probably know. Or take a known design on another frequency and scale for wavelength. Here is an article that I wrote for my job a couple of years ago on the topic. Basics of Quadrifilar Helix Antennas

Cheers!
Back to top
uzzors2k
Wed Feb 15 2017, 06:49PM
uzzors2k Registered Member #95 Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 04:57PM
Location: Norway
Posts: 1308
Thanks for the replies. I should have included some more information in the first post. What I did was measure the return loss by following the procedure outlined here Link2, using a mini-circuits directional coupler. I've also made plots of the VSWR, which I've included now. The antenna is indeed for weather satellite reception, so I'm only aiming to receive signals between 137-138MHz. It has worked quite well, here's a Meteor M2 pass I received this Sunday. I'm located roughly in Oslo, and the satellite was southbound, passing to the east. So I guess one can infer where a null in my reception is. I've also been able to receive passing NOAA satellites, which seem to have a stronger signal (probably due to lower bandwidth?).


S 122 Mcir


Excellent article Waverider, I'll have to read it more thoroughly. I based my design on one of the calculators out there, which is what the rev 1.0 results are from. Based on my Tesla coil days, I knew I wouldn't get the antenna right without some tuning afterwards. So from my plots, it would I appear I've improved the selectivity. Is there any way I can check if the phasing/polarization is still correct? And can my modifications impact the radiation pattern, or is it given more by the form of the two loops, rather than conductor lengths?

]vswr_qfh_rev1_narrowband.pdf[/file]
]vswr_qfh_rev1.2_narrowband.pdf[/file]
Back to top

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.