Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 26
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
All today's birthdays', congrats!
Kipmans (34)
DuartmaN (47)


Next birthdays
04/23 Kipmans (34)
04/23 DuartmaN (47)
04/24 Jack (13)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: Electromagnetic Radiation
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

Pulse width of a red laser diode as a function of the width of the corresponding electrical pulse

Move Thread LAN_403
Physikfan
Sun Dec 18 2016, 05:20PM
Physikfan Registered Member #60240 Joined: Mon May 16 2016, 07:01PM
Location:
Posts: 304
Hi

In the experiment for determining the speed of light with the aid of a pulsed red diode laser,
I found out that a relatively broad electrical pulse (about 6 ns) could generate a relatively small laser pulse (about 1 ns).
In order to study this phenomenon, I have made further experiments with differently wide electrical pulses, the amplitude being 5.5 V plus 2 V bias DC at 50 Ohm.
For each electrical pulse width, the laser pulse width as well as the amplitude were determined with a Si photodiode with a rise or fall time of 150 ps.
The oscilloscope was an analog Tektronix with a 7904 frame and twice 7A19 and a 7B10, (500 MHz bandwidth).

P1050023400x300
At approximately two nanoseconds of electrical pulse width, a very small and narrow laser pulse with about 2 mV amplitude is obtained at the detector.
P1050024400x323
At approximately three nanoseconds of the electrical pulse width, a laser pulse of about 6 mV amplitude and 1 ns pulse width is obtained at the detector.
P1050025400x325
At approximately six nanoseconds of the electrical pulse width, a laser pulse with an amplitude of about 8 mV and a pulse width of 4 ns is obtained at the detector.
P1050035400x300
At approximately 15 nanoseconds of the electrical pulse width, a laser pulse of about 10 mV amplitude and 13 ns pulse width is obtained at the detector.

Please, who has ideas how to explain this phenomenon?
Back to top
Sulaiman
Mon Dec 19 2016, 08:33AM
Sulaiman Registered Member #162 Joined: Mon Feb 13 2006, 10:25AM
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 3140
can you give a link to laser-diode and photo-diode datasheets
and an idea of the physical setup
Back to top
johnf
Mon Dec 19 2016, 06:22PM
johnf Registered Member #230 Joined: Tue Feb 21 2006, 08:01PM
Location: Gracefield lower Hutt
Posts: 284
I gave you the explanation in your other post about this setup.
capacitance of the setup, source impedance of your driver. see my previous post
Back to top
Physikfan
Mon Dec 19 2016, 09:49PM
Physikfan Registered Member #60240 Joined: Mon May 16 2016, 07:01PM
Location:
Posts: 304
Hi Sulaiman

The interesting facts are that
1. the difference between the electrical pulse width and the optical pulse width is almost constant (2ns) and
2. almost independent of the electrical pulse width.

The specs of the laser diode are:

The laser diode is a Mitsubishi ML101U29,
maximum CW power 150 mW,
maximum pulse power 400mW,
wave length 660 nm,
threshhold current 85mA,
At 120 mW CW power the operating current is 205 mA, the operating voltage is 2.35V

Link2

The Si-photodiode is a Thorlabs DET025AL/M:

Detector Si
Active Area Diameter Ø 250 μm
Wavelength Range 400 to 1100 nm
Peak Wavelength 730 nm (Typ.)
Diode Capacitance 1.73 pF (Max)
Cutoff Frequency 2 GHz (Max)
Rise Time 150 ps (Typ.)
Fall Time 150 ps (Typ.)
Damage Threshold 18 mW
Dark Current 35 pA
Output Voltage 0 to 2 V (50Ω)

Link2

The experimental setup will follow.


Back to top
Physikfan
Mon Dec 19 2016, 10:19PM
Physikfan Registered Member #60240 Joined: Mon May 16 2016, 07:01PM
Location:
Posts: 304
Hi Johnf

You wrote:

"your pulse if the area under it is intergrated that is the loule amount
now put that amount into an unknown capacitor q=CV so now you can estimate the capacitance by reducing the area under the pulse so that V or voltage does not get above the lasing threshold of your device.
dont forget the capacitance includes the cables pcb and the laser diode itself.
work backwards you do not need too much capacitance upset the diode output"

Unfortunately there is no value of the laser diode capacitance in the data sheet.

Does your explanation allow also this asymmetrical behavior between the electrical and the laser pulse, this difference of almost constant 2 ns?
Back to top
johnf
Tue Dec 20 2016, 06:35PM
johnf Registered Member #230 Joined: Tue Feb 21 2006, 08:01PM
Location: Gracefield lower Hutt
Posts: 284
you can get a feel for how much the capacitance is by adding some more. ie put a 47pf cap across your diode and see what change the brings.
No change go for 470pf --if still no change 4700pf I doubt you will need to get to 4700pf. As for the assymetry does the driver source and sink current or does it only source, if it only sources then the assymetry is probably due to the stray capacitance.
Back to top
Physikfan
Wed Dec 21 2016, 04:46PM
Physikfan Registered Member #60240 Joined: Mon May 16 2016, 07:01PM
Location:
Posts: 304
Hi Johnf

I will do these experiments.

This is my experimental setup:
Laserdiodepulse6

In the paper "Pulsing a Laser Diode" by Doug Hodgson, Kent Noonan, Bill Olsen, and Thad Orosz
they published a figure with an electrical pulse, 1V/cm, feeding the laser diode and also the laser pulse, 10mV/cm, x-axes is 50 ns/cm.
As you can see the electrical pulse width is 200 ns, whereas the laser pulse with is only 180 ns, difference is 20 ns, similar to my experiment, difference is 2 ns:

Laserdiodepulse0

There is also a new question:
Why is the difference 2 ns in my case?
Even the authors of the Newport paper did not
mention their 20 ns!


Both figures are taken from:
Link2

Please, what is your explanation?
Back to top

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.