Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 44
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
No birthdays today

Next birthdays
04/28 Steve Conner (46)
04/29 GODSFUSION (37)
04/29 Zajcek (37)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: General Science and Electronics
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

Triangular Truss.

Move Thread LAN_403
Patrick
Sun Sept 25 2016, 10:48PM
Patrick Registered Member #2431 Joined: Tue Oct 13 2009, 09:47PM
Location: Chico, CA. USA
Posts: 5639
Iv been looking into controlling not just mass and strength, but now the cost of various drone features.

It seems Mechanical and Civil engineers have been using the truss and "I" beam ideas for quite awhile and they're well understood. I dont understand the statics and calculus, nor do i have a program to visualize working or failing conditions. But the triangular truss really caught my attention.

4 parallel rods seemed unnecessary, 2 doesn't work, so 3 seemed to fit the bill.


1474843728 2431 FT0 Truss 1

1474843728 2431 FT0 Truss 2


As you can see I used a I-beam with two end plates of aluminum. All the strands are carbon fiber of 6k. Eventually Ill move to 12k on the parallels and keep the 6k's on the shear diagonals. The triangle is 3" on each side, and the screws at both ends tension the parallels. I m trying to arrange the forces to follow the fibers, which generally can only be approximated with like homogeneous materials like metals.

Carbon "tow" as its called is cheap per foot, especially compared to carbon fabric, and its quantity of epoxy needed for fabric.
Back to top
Dr. Slack
Sat Oct 08 2016, 06:12AM
Dr. Slack Registered Member #72 Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 08:29AM
Location: UK St. Albans
Posts: 1659
To avoid the need for resistance to bending, it's important to structure the truss properly.

A compression member will fail by buckling, see wikipedia page on that term. Basically a thick column is safe, a slender column could fail. In order to support the column from buckling failure, it is supported sideways every so often by cross connection to other members, the trianglular truss.

Your illustration shows an incomplete bracing. Each long element is supported in only one lateral direction. This means that the long element relies on its stiffness for stability in the other direction. Unequal stiffness requirements like this is not efficient.

Interestingly, if you look at stock photos of lattice pylons, they have a similar incomplete bracing structure, like this one. However, the long element is an iron angle, which has inherent stiffness, and fails by twisting. Incomplete bracing *is* sufficient to brace against twisting failure.


1475912665 72 FT1630 Pylon Getty



To fully brace a triangular truss, which can then have length elements without stiffness against bending, you need to have 6 elements meeting at a point. This restrains the sideways movement of the brace point in two directions. Unfortunately this does not result in an aesthetically pleasing fully symmetrical structure, as the cross braces need to be at different angles, like this.


U5974


They don't have to be normal and diagonal, as above, which is quite easy to set out and manufacture with bar and welding, and gives important level steps for climbing. To my mind, a more pleasing pattern, and easier to make with tow, would be bracing consisting of a red clockwise spiral with pitch 1, and then a two-start pair of anti-clockwise spirals of pitch 2 in green. You would find it easier to make as well than what you've illustrated, each tow is simply wound round the outside in a single direction, rather than threaded back and forth. Like this ...



1477071544 72 FT1630 Base 5



Back to top

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.