Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 22
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
All today's birthdays', congrats!
Bead (41)
Fumeaux (25)


Next birthdays
04/26 Bead (41)
04/26 Fumeaux (25)
04/28 Steve Conner (46)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: Electromagnetic Radiation
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

SDR and superconductivity

Move Thread LAN_403
Conundrum
Mon Oct 06 2014, 08:22AM
Conundrum Registered Member #96 Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 05:37PM
Location: CI, Earth
Posts: 4059
Hi all.

Recent research on the complex waveforms of superconductors leads me to the hypothesis that an SDR setup could detect latent superconductivity in a compound.

The effect would be that at some combination of magnetic field, temperature and wideband RF field a phase transition would occur in the complex waveform, such that some frequencies would be absorbed and others boosted.
This would unambiguously show that a given material had a superconducting fraction even if it was less than 1/10000th of the bulk and thus allow material improvements to be made.

A variant of this would be a metal detector like device with a strong permanent magnet that would be able to detect superconducting materials in nature by measuring said fields.
Any ideas?
-A
edit: modified due to IP issues, PM me for further information.
Back to top
Steve Conner
Mon Oct 06 2014, 10:02AM
Steve Conner Registered Member #30 Joined: Fri Feb 03 2006, 10:52AM
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
Posts: 6706
Can you explain how these phase transitions "unambiguously" show that a fraction of the material became superconducting? To me, a much more likely explanation is that the resistivity of the whole material changed by a tiny bit.
Back to top
Conundrum
Mon Oct 06 2014, 11:23AM
Conundrum Registered Member #96 Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 05:37PM
Location: CI, Earth
Posts: 4059
Similar curves have been documented in Y123 and BSCCO samples from 1987 when HTSC was discovered.

Also with classic magnetoresistive (MR) materials this effect is normally not seen, resistance is linear or logarithmic
with changing magnetic field and temperature has much less of an effect.

Spin valve GMR is slightly different, with these you can indeed see steep changes in resistance with a small magnetic field change due to the quantum Hall effect.

I am still learning so bear with me..

edit:
Back to top
Andy
Thu Oct 09 2014, 04:47AM
Andy Registered Member #4266 Joined: Fri Dec 16 2011, 03:15AM
Location:
Posts: 874
My bad
Back to top
Conundrum
Fri Oct 10 2014, 04:21AM
Conundrum Registered Member #96 Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 05:37PM
Location: CI, Earth
Posts: 4059
Also relevant to this discussion is a new material called tungsten ditelluride (WTe2) which it turns out has "large" magnetoresistance ie it doesn't saturate.

See Link2

Also Link2


Back to top
Andy
Fri Oct 10 2014, 05:27AM
Andy Registered Member #4266 Joined: Fri Dec 16 2011, 03:15AM
Location:
Posts: 874
Hi Conundrum
Just a rought back of the note book but might help

W = 54.4947
360 / = (4π×10−7*1*sin(54.49) = 12.568*0.81406
= 10.23*(45Degrre*X*3.142) =
22.73xy*(45Degree*Y*3.142) =
50.50

Te = 77.5502
360 /=(4π×10−7*1*sin(77.5502) = 12.568*0.976485
=12.27246*(45Degrre*X*3.142) =
27.266xy*(45Degree*Y*3.142) =
60.5776

Te =* 2 Combine subtract
121.1553
54.532
87.843Angles
39.538
72.85
24.54


W+Te2 X Y Z angles of electron direction on orbit
121.1553+50.50 = 171.6553=143.853=126.313
54.532+50.50 = 105.032=77.262=59.722
87.843Angles+50.50 = 138.343=110.573=93.033
39.538+50.50 = 90.038=62.268=44.728
72.85+50.50 = 123.35=95.58=78.04
24.54+50.50 = 75.04=47.27=29.73
Back to top
Conundrum
Sun Oct 19 2014, 04:28PM
Conundrum Registered Member #96 Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 05:37PM
Location: CI, Earth
Posts: 4059
Interesting, thanks for sharing.

EDIT: Time to build a prototype and get experimenting.
I have been criticized on here for not getting anything built so this will be rectified as soon as possible.

-A
Back to top

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.