Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 29
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
All today's birthdays', congrats!
Desmogod (48)
Alex Smith (31)


Next birthdays
04/25 Desmogod (48)
04/25 Alex Smith (31)
04/26 Bead (41)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: Tesla Coils
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

Rotary spark gap old idea

Move Thread LAN_403
dexter
Wed Aug 13 2014, 08:30PM
dexter Registered Member #42796 Joined: Mon Jan 13 2014, 06:34PM
Location:
Posts: 195
Recently i got my hands on a working MOT and few more are incoming in the next week/s and after playing wit its resonant arcs i decided to to build that spark gap tesla coil i wanted to build many years ago: MOT - voltage doubler - homerolled caps and my 3 pole rotary spark gap.

Alot of info about DC Tesla coil i got from this Link2
So basically in order to make a DC TC a charging circuit (resistive or inductive) has to be used for the tank capacitor which come with advantages and disadvantages...

1407956996 42796 FT0 Dcsgtc

So my idea is to use a 3 pole rotary spark gap that will dramatically reduce or even eliminate the need of a charging circuit

1407957956 42796 FT0 Dc3sgtc

First electrodes 1 and 2 of the RSG come in contact connecting the HVDC to the cap charging it, moments later as the RSG advances electrode 1 is disconnected and 2 and 3 connected, connecting the charged cap to the TC primary coil which will osculate at the resonant frequency.
By using this 3 pole RSG setup the HVDC will never see a heavy load or even a short circuit as when a 2 pole SG fires (subdimensioned charging resistor or inductor) and also no HF current from the LC will go into the HVDC damaging it

I have some pictures of my old 3 pole rotary spark gap made from glued together DVD's 1mm copper plate as 2nd electrode, 3mm bolts for 1 and 3 electrodes and a DC motor. Note that the connecting wires and central electrode on the bottom are missing

1407959610 42796 FT0 Dsc03618


close up of the electrodes

1407960003 42796 FT0 Dsc03619


The static electrodes were all 3 in the same plane with the motor axis and made from the same bolts. As the weal rotate the copper plate (electrode 2) and one of the bolts (electrode 1) come in contact with the static electrodes, moments later electrode 1 gets disconnected and electrode 3 get connected to its corresponding static electrode.

The coil produced horrible sparks but it was poorly designed, for the HVDC i used a PC monitor flyback so low current high voltage and the distance between all the electrodes was small that i was getting arcs between 1 and 3.bypassing the cap - basically little thinking involved

I want to start over this time sizing everything accordingly...

So what do you people tink about this 3 pole rotary spark gap?
Back to top
Steve Conner
Wed Aug 13 2014, 09:53PM
Steve Conner Registered Member #30 Joined: Fri Feb 03 2006, 10:52AM
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
Posts: 6706
You always have to charge the tank capacitor through an inductor. Any other arrangement wastes 50% of the power as heat.

In a conventional AC powered coil, the ballast inductance or leakage reactance of the transformer does the job.
Back to top
loneoceans
Thu Aug 14 2014, 12:57AM
loneoceans Registered Member #4098 Joined: Fri Sept 16 2011, 09:26PM
Location:
Posts: 236
For the spark gap material, I would really recommend using a better rotor material for your safety. Not only is it not strong enough to support the forces the electrodes will put on the rotor, it also softens at a very low temperature (around 150C or less) and you are at significant risk of your disk shattering! I would recommend something like fiberglass which has an order of magnitude greater tensile strength and is much more heat resistant. In addition, I would think that a better material such as brass bolts would be an easy replacement and fair much better than steel. In your current setup, your dwell time when the circuit is in 'charge mode' is very small, and you'll need a huge surge of charge current at the time you're 'charging'. Regardless, you will still need a charging circuit as Steve said, otherwise half of the energy will be lost as heat.
Back to top
dexter
Thu Aug 14 2014, 05:57AM
dexter Registered Member #42796 Joined: Mon Jan 13 2014, 06:34PM
Location:
Posts: 195
loneoceans wrote ...

For the spark gap material, I would really recommend using a better rotor material for your safety. Not only is it not strong enough to support the forces the electrodes will put on the rotor, it also softens at a very low temperature (around 150C or less) and you are at significant risk of your disk shattering! I would recommend something like fiberglass which has an order of magnitude greater tensile strength and is much more heat resistant. In addition, I would think that a better material such as brass bolts would be an easy replacement and fair much better than steel. In your current setup, your dwell time when the circuit is in 'charge mode' is very small, and you'll need a huge surge of charge current at the time you're 'charging'. Regardless, you will still need a charging circuit as Steve said, otherwise half of the energy will be lost as heat.

like i said that design was long time ago when i didn't knew much about....
I know this RSG is dangerous but i posted those pictures anyway for a better understanding of my idea.

What i'm trying to find here is if this 3 pole spark gap can work better than a regular 2 pole one and if the charging circuit can be reduced since it is only used for charging the cap and not for blocking the HF current from the L-C
Back to top
Hydron
Thu Aug 14 2014, 12:19PM
Hydron Registered Member #30656 Joined: Tue Jul 30 2013, 02:40AM
Location: UK
Posts: 208
Unfortunately this idea isn't really feasible. You'd be trying to do two different things with one gap: charge the cap up relatively slowly (slow quench), and discharge it very quickly (fast quench). It would be difficult to accommodate both with one gap, and it is pointless anyway, as you need a ballast to control the charging and stop the gap power-arcing regardless, removing the requirement for breaking the connection to the transformer. MOTs are rugged enough to handle being connected across the gap (via a ballast choke).

Secondly, as previously mentioned, your gap is extremely dangerous! The geek group burnt down their lab with a much better constructed gap than what you've built, so don't even think of trying it for anything stronger than a flyback!
Back to top

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.