Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 31
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
One birthday today, congrats!
gentoo_daemon (42)


Next birthdays
04/21 kilovolt (49)
04/21 wannabegeekTC (49)
04/21 Elijah (33)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: Tesla Coils
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

Double Resonant Precharger Circuit Question

Move Thread LAN_403
TeslaRay
Sat Mar 15 2014, 05:37PM
TeslaRay Registered Member #30606 Joined: Mon Jul 29 2013, 01:55PM
Location:
Posts: 5
Good Afternoon Everyone!
We are building a large Double Resonant Tesla Coil for university project and have a question about a Precharger Device.
I see that many coilers are using these precharge devices for their Double Resonant Tesla Coils.
Here is an example from a Eric Goodchild that was found through a quick GOOGLE search.

Link2

I guess my question is that is the only reason to use these to provide a soft charge of the main power supply across the bridge of the igbts?
From looking at this, it appears that there is a relay switching in a large value resistor to do this and then once charged up, the resistor is switched out.
Also, what is the purpose of having two large electrolitics in the precharger circuit itself? Is it better to double the voltage in the precharger circuit and then send out a doubled AC voltage to the main capacitors across the igbt bridge?
In that case, is voltage doubling only occur in the precharge circuit and not at the main Tesla coil itself?
Back to top
Goodchild
Sat Mar 15 2014, 05:42PM
Goodchild Registered Member #2292 Joined: Fri Aug 14 2009, 05:33PM
Location: The Wild West AKA Arizona
Posts: 795
Hello and welcome to the forum.

As it happens I'm Eric Goodchild. There are two reason behind those prechargers. One to double and rectify the 240VAC mains to 680VDC. And second to precharge the bus to 680V thru the ballasting resistor. Once we are up to 680VDC we bypass the resistor with a relay.

The caps are part of the doubling circuit, (two caps two diodes).
Back to top
TeslaRay
Sun Mar 16 2014, 01:53PM
TeslaRay Registered Member #30606 Joined: Mon Jul 29 2013, 01:55PM
Location:
Posts: 5
good stuff

and is there a reason why the doubler is external to Tesla Coil as opposed to putting it right at the igbt bridge?

and in this configuration as you show, is there any special ratio that the doubler capacitors have to be with respect to the bulk storage at the igbt bridge?
Back to top
Goodchild
Mon Mar 17 2014, 12:01AM
Goodchild Registered Member #2292 Joined: Fri Aug 14 2009, 05:33PM
Location: The Wild West AKA Arizona
Posts: 795
The only reason I do it is to reduce the size of the transmission line to the coil. At 680V the current is much lower for the same amount of power, in addition the power factor for that section of the line is also close to 1, due to it being DC. This helps a small amount with losses.
Back to top
Dr. Dark Current
Mon Mar 17 2014, 09:56AM
Dr. Dark Current Registered Member #152 Joined: Sun Feb 12 2006, 03:36PM
Location: Czech Rep.
Posts: 3384
That also didn't make sense to me. In the wall and outside, you have hundred meters of cable, a few meters more will not do anything and you will save caps. Also, a simple resistor and a relay for the soft start is enough. The resistor needs only be rated at a low power (say 20 watts) because only thermal capacity plays a role. This circuit can be integrated into a very small space in the coil.
Back to top
Thomas W
Mon Mar 17 2014, 11:14AM
Thomas W Registered Member #3324 Joined: Sun Oct 17 2010, 06:57PM
Location:
Posts: 1276
Goodchild wrote ...

The only reason I do it is to reduce the size of the transmission line to the coil. At 680V the current is much lower for the same amount of power, in addition the power factor for that section of the line is also close to 1, due to it being DC. This helps a small amount with losses.

Thats actually a really good idea, meaning you only need a few meters of 50A cable and you could do the rest in 16A cable instead, saves a resonable chunk of money considering
64A SY flex is around £5 per meter here and 16A flex is around £1 a meter or so.
Back to top
HV Enthusiast
Mon Mar 17 2014, 02:16PM
HV Enthusiast Registered Member #15 Joined: Thu Feb 02 2006, 01:11PM
Location:
Posts: 3068
Hi TeslaRay. You didn't say what your DRSSTC output power is, but if its a med-power DRSSTC (such as in the range of a few kW), then you can use thermistors instead of a switched in inrush resistor. Simply use two thermistors - one on each leg of your input AC. These work great and are used in appliances for the same exact application. At cold, they have a high resistor (typically 1-10 ohms), but once they heat up and are under load, they decrease to a few hundreths of an ohm. They are rated up to 50+A current. Of course, if you are making a high power DRSSTC, then the pre charging circuit would be a better solution.
Back to top
Goodchild
Mon Mar 17 2014, 03:17PM
Goodchild Registered Member #2292 Joined: Fri Aug 14 2009, 05:33PM
Location: The Wild West AKA Arizona
Posts: 795
Thomas W wrote ...

Goodchild wrote ...

The only reason I do it is to reduce the size of the transmission line to the coil. At 680V the current is much lower for the same amount of power, in addition the power factor for that section of the line is also close to 1, due to it being DC. This helps a small amount with losses.

Thats actually a really good idea, meaning you only need a few meters of 50A cable and you could do the rest in 16A cable instead, saves a resonable chunk of money considering
64A SY flex is around £5 per meter here and 16A flex is around £1 a meter or so.


Exactly right!

I just threw the PF thing in because it's a fun fact. It doesn’t save a whole lot of power. Maybe a few mW saved at the most. The main reason is reduced cable size. Savings in both cost and weight of the cable.
Back to top

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.